Skip to content

Futibatinib and Pembrolizumab Combination in the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

A Phase 2 Study Evaluating Futibatinib (TAS 120) Plus Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04601857
Enrollment
43
Registered
2020-10-26
Start date
2021-01-07
Completion date
2025-09-16
Last updated
2025-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

Keywords

Futibatinib, Pembrolizumab, Urothelial cancer, FGFR, TAS120, MK3475 B04

Brief summary

The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the antitumor activity and confirm the safety for the combination of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) inhibitor futibatinib and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who are not candidates to receive a platinum-based treatment regimens.

Interventions

DRUGFutibatinib

Oral

DRUGPembrolizumab

IV

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Taiho Oncology, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent for the trial. 2. Age ≥ 18 years of age 3. Histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have not received systemic treatment for advanced metastatic disease. 1. Cohort A: must have an FGFR3 mutation or FGFR1-4 fusion/rearrangement. 2. Cohort B: all other patients with UC (including patients with other FGFR or non-FGFR genetic aberrations and patients with wild-type \[non-mutated\] tumors) 4. Unfit for or intolerant to standard platinum-based chemotherapy. 5. Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 1. 6. Adequate organ function. 7. Have a measurable disease per RECIST 1.1

Exclusion criteria

1. Have received prior therapy with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1/L2 agent or FGFR inhibitor. 2. History and/or current evidence of any of the following disorders: 1. Non-tumor related alteration of the calcium-phosphorus homeostasis that is considered clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator. 2. Ectopic mineralization/calcification considered clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator. 3. Retinal or corneal disorder considered clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator. 3. Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug. 4. Have an active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years. 5. Have a history of (noninfectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or has current pneumonitis. 6. Have had an allogenic tissue/ organ transplant. 7. Has known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or history of Hepatitis B or C infections, or known to be positive for Hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg)/ Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA or Hepatitis C Antibody or RNA. 8. Have known active central nervous system metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. 9. Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving chronic systemic steroid therapy. 10. Has severe hypersensitivity (≥Grade 3) to pembrolizumab and/or any of its excipients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Up to 38 monthsORR was defined as the proportion of participants experiencing a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) criteria based on investigator assessment. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters (mm).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Up to 38 monthsDCR was defined as the proportion of participants experiencing a best overall response of SD, PR, or CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis \<10 mm.
Duration of Response (DOR)Up to 38 monthsDOR was calculated for all responders from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Up to 38 monthsPFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study therapy to the date of death (any cause) or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier method, with PFS time being censored on the date of the last tumor assessment. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for median PFS was provided using the Kaplan-Meier procedure.
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 38 monthsOS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the death date. Participants without a documented death date were censored on the last date they were known to be alive.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Up to 38 monthsAn adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are defined as AEs reported up to 30 days after the last dose of any study therapy (safety follow-up) or until the start of new antitumor therapy, whichever is earlier, unless otherwise specified.

Countries

France, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 18 sites in the United States, France and Spain from 07 January 2021 to 16 September 2025.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 43 participants were enrolled to receive futibatinib along with pembrolizumab.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A
Participants with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and FGFR3 mutation or FGFR1-4 fusion/rearrangement received futibatinib 20 milligrams (mg), orally, once daily (QD), in a 21-day cycle for maximum duration of 590 days along with pembrolizumab 200 mg, intravenously (IV), every 3 weeks (Q3W), in a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 35 doses or a maximum duration of 2 years.
17
Cohort B
Participants with metastatic UC (including participants with other FGFR or non-FGFR genetic aberrations and participants with wild type \[non-mutated\] tumors) received futibatinib 20 mg, orally, QD, in a 21-day cycle for maximum duration of 563 days along with pembrolizumab 200 mg, IV, Q3W in a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 35 doses or a maximum duration of 2 years.
26
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event/Serious Adverse Event37
Overall StudyAt the Participant's Request01
Overall StudyClinical Disease Progression21
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyDisease Progression24
Overall StudyRadiological Progression411
Overall StudyReason Not Specified01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort ACohort BTotal
Age, Continuous73.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
72.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.03
72.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants17 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
7 Participants15 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants23 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 1713 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 1726 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 1712 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the proportion of participants experiencing a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) criteria based on investigator assessment. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to less than (\<)10 millimeters (mm).

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: All treated population included all participants in all enrolled population who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort AObjective Response Rate (ORR)47.1 percentage of participants
Cohort BObjective Response Rate (ORR)26.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was defined as the proportion of participants experiencing a best overall response of SD, PR, or CR. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), referencing the smallest sum diameters while on study. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis \<10 mm.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: All treated population included all participants in all enrolled population who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort ADisease Control Rate (DCR)82.4 percentage of participants
Cohort BDisease Control Rate (DCR)53.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was calculated for all responders from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Evaluation of target lesions defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions (if applicable), and normalization of tumor marker level; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of diameters for all target lesion assessments. Evaluation of non-target lesions was defined as the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. For both target and non-target evaluations, any pathological lymph node must have had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: All treated population included all participants in all enrolled population who received at least one dose of study drug. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort ADuration of Response (DOR)12.32 months
Cohort BDuration of Response (DOR)14.46 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are defined as AEs reported up to 30 days after the last dose of any study therapy (safety follow-up) or until the start of new antitumor therapy, whichever is earlier, unless otherwise specified.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: All treated population included all participants in all enrolled population who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort ANumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)17 Participants
Cohort BNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)26 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the death date. Participants without a documented death date were censored on the last date they were known to be alive.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: All treated population included all participants in all enrolled population who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort AOverall Survival (OS)16.2 months
Cohort BOverall Survival (OS)18.3 months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of study therapy to the date of death (any cause) or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier method, with PFS time being censored on the date of the last tumor assessment. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for median PFS was provided using the Kaplan-Meier procedure.

Time frame: Up to 38 months

Population: All treated population included all participants in all enrolled population who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort AProgression-free Survival (PFS)8.3 months
Cohort BProgression-free Survival (PFS)4.1 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026