Skip to content

Goal Elicitation, Treatment Prioritization, & Electronically-Practiced Discussion for Psychiatry

Study Title: Goal Elicitation, Treatment Prioritization, & Electronically-Practiced Discussion - Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04601194
Acronym
GET-PrEPD
Enrollment
29
Registered
2020-10-23
Start date
2021-04-20
Completion date
2022-02-10
Last updated
2023-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Illness, Shared Decision Making

Keywords

serious mental illness, shared decision making-psychiatric medications, mental health

Brief summary

GET PrEPD-Psychiatry is a mixed-methods, developmental study to adapt a shared decision making (SDM) intervention to be specific for psychiatry decisions (Aim 1, previously completed), evaluate its feasibility and acceptability (Aim 2), and examine potential mechanisms of change and preliminary outcomes (Aim 3) of this innovative intervention to increase SDM and self-management for adults with serious mental illness (SMI). In line with National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) priorities, we are examining whether GET PrEPD-Psychiatry engages the target mechanisms that putatively underlie the intervention (i.e., patient activation and communication self-efficacy; Aim 3). Aim 1 used approximately 200 deidentified transcripts from our prior study of SDM in psychiatry to cull language used in decision-making. These conversations were then used to program the Virtual Provider to represent common interactions and decisions in psychiatric visits. Iterative testing of the use of the Virtual Provider has been completed and feedback was obtained from our psychiatry consultants to refine the program. For Aim 2, we will recruit up to 40 patients to participate in GET PrEPD-Psychiatry (4 weekly goal setting/coaching sessions, coupled with Virtual Provider training and practice). We will assess participant satisfaction and utility ratings, as well as track their use (frequency and time-on-task) of the Virtual Provider program. For Aim 3, we will follow enrolled patient participants, interviewing them at baseline and approximately 3 months later. We hypothesize that participants will have significantly 1) improved mechanisms of change, demonstrated by increases in self-reported activation and communication self-efficacy, 2) improved SDM, and 3) improved self-management and recovery attitudes. The Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview (NEII), completed at approximately 3 months, will be used as a qualitative interview guide to understand the acceptability and impact of the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCoaching and Virtual Provider Program Practice

4 weekly goal setting/coaching sessions, coupled with Virtual Provider program training and practice

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Eskenazi Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years of age * Current patient at the participating mental health center * English speaking * Willingness to participate in weekly coaching sessions, engage in practice with the Virtual Provider program

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years of age * No reasonable access to use of internet on a computer * Inability or unwillingness to use a computer (necessary for Virtual Provider Program practice) * Never or rarely uses a computer or similar device (based on self-report) * Very or somewhat uncomfortable using a computer or similar device (based on self-report)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH)Baseline, 3 monthsThe 13-item Patient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH) assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-managing one's chronic health condition. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater activation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) MeasureBaseline, 3 monthsThe 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure assesses commitment, informed choice, and navigation. Scores range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more engagement.
Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5)Baseline, 3 monthsThe 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5) measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit; scores range from 1-10. The questionnaire is rated on a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived efficacy in the interactions.
Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) ScaleBaseline, 3 monthsIllness self management will be assessed with the consumer-rated Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Scale; items are rated on a 5-point behaviorally anchored scale and averaged. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher number reflecting greater self-management.
Recovery Assessment Scale (Brief Version)Baseline, 3 monthsRecovery attitudes will be assessed using the total score of the 20-item Brief version of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Using the average score, the scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating greater self-reported recovery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Coaching and Virtual Provider Group
Mental Health Coaching and assigned practice with a Virtual Provider Program Coaching and Virtual Provider Program Practice: 4 weekly goal setting/coaching sessions, coupled with Virtual Provider program training and practice
29
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCoaching and Virtual Provider Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
Age, Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Caretaking responsibilities for a child or children less than 18 years in same household
No
24 Participants
Caretaking responsibilities for a child or children less than 18 years in same household
Yes
5 Participants
Current Employment Status
Casual Work
2 Participants
Current Employment Status
Disabled
13 Participants
Current Employment Status
Other: Retired and Disabled
1 Participants
Current Employment Status
Paid Employment
5 Participants
Current Employment Status
Student
1 Participants
Current Employment Status
Unemployed and looking for work
5 Participants
Current Employment Status
Unemployed and not looking for work
2 Participants
Current Housing
Homeless (includes in shelter)
3 Participants
Current Housing
Living with family (not spouse)
4 Participants
Current Housing
Own apartment or house-alone
4 Participants
Current Housing
Own apartment or house-with spouse, living as married, with friends
10 Participants
Current Housing
Semi-independent living (staff member lives on site or foster family care)
1 Participants
Current Housing
Staying with friends or family temporarily
5 Participants
Current Housing
Structured congregate living (e.g., nursing home, group home, residential facility)
2 Participants
Current Marital Status
Currently married or living with a partner
2 Participants
Current Marital Status
Separated or divorced
6 Participants
Current Marital Status
Single, never married
20 Participants
Current Marital Status
Widowed
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Bachelors degree
3 Participants
Highest Level of Education
High school degree/GED
9 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Less than high school/GED
5 Participants
Highest Level of Education
Some college coursework
12 Participants
Primary Mental Health Diagnosis
Anxiety Disorders (Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder)
4 Participants
Primary Mental Health Diagnosis
Bipolar Disorder
4 Participants
Primary Mental Health Diagnosis
Major Depressive Disorder
7 Participants
Primary Mental Health Diagnosis
Other (Difficulty Controlling Anger, Adjustment Disorder)
2 Participants
Primary Mental Health Diagnosis
Schizophrenia (Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Chronic Schizophrenia)
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH)

The 13-item Patient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH) assesses patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-managing one's chronic health condition. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating greater activation.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: 7 subjects were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupPatient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH)Baseline59.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupPatient Activation Measure for Mental Health (PAM-MH)3 Months61.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure

The 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure assesses commitment, informed choice, and navigation. Scores range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more engagement.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: 7 subjects were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupAltarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) MeasureBaseline2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupAltarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure3 Months2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Scale

Illness self management will be assessed with the consumer-rated Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Scale; items are rated on a 5-point behaviorally anchored scale and averaged. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher number reflecting greater self-management.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: 7 subjects were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupIllness Management and Recovery (IMR) ScaleBaseline3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupIllness Management and Recovery (IMR) Scale3 Months3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5)

The 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5) measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit; scores range from 1-10. The questionnaire is rated on a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived efficacy in the interactions.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: 7 subjects were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupPerceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5)Baseline7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupPerceived Efficacy in Patient-Provider Interactions (PEPPI-5)3 Months7.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Recovery Assessment Scale (Brief Version)

Recovery attitudes will be assessed using the total score of the 20-item Brief version of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Using the average score, the scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating greater self-reported recovery.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: 7 subjects were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupRecovery Assessment Scale (Brief Version)Baseline4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Coaching and Virtual Provider GroupRecovery Assessment Scale (Brief Version)3 Months3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026