Skip to content

Shockwave Assisted Large Bore Access

Shockwave Assisted Large Bore Access (TAVR, TEVAR, EVAR, FEVAR)

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04600934
Enrollment
0
Registered
2020-10-23
Start date
2022-10-03
Completion date
2023-09-28
Last updated
2024-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vascular Diseases

Keywords

Vascular Surgery

Brief summary

Annually, 150-200 TAVR with unilateral large bore access and 200 combined TEVAR/EVAR/FEVAR with bilateral large bore access are performed at our institution. Nearly 50 percent of patients fall outside IFU for access vessel size. Adjuncts described include iliac conduit, crack and pave, balloon expandable sheaths, direct aortic puncture, transcaval delivery, alternative access point (i.e axillary, carotid). Each of these adjuncts comes with additional complication potential and by nature of being used less frequently than the standard femoral access makes the procedure more challenging. The intervention the use of the Shockwave Medical, Inc. Peripheral Lithoplasty® System to achieve large bore access in patients whose vessels fall outside of the IFU suggested dimensions.

Interventions

DEVICEShockwave

Shockwave Medical, Inc. Peripheral Lithoplasty® System

Sponsors

Shockwave Medical, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years * Indicated for planned procedure requiring large bore (\>12 French sheath) access * Mental capacity to provide informed consent * Iliac access vessel demonstrates \>50% circumferential calcium * Iliac access vessel demonstrates maximum inner lumen diameter less than IFU for device required * Iliac access vessel demonstrates maximum outer wall diameter greater than or equal to IFU for device required * Preoperative CT angiogram, \</= 5mm slices * Preoperative ABI/TP * Unsuccessful delivery of large bore sheath without adjunctive intervention o Definition of unsuccessful = operator assessment of the following * Visible distortion of iliac artery calcification under fluoroscopy without forward progress of device * Adverse forward pressure application by operator * Failure of device to track with external pressure applied to abdomen * Patient intolerance of advancement (pain response) in awake patient

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or plavix) * Planned iliofemoral surgical reconstruction in next 30 days * Prior common or external iliac artery stent placement * Prior aorto-iliac, aorto-femoral, or iliofemoral bypass present * Iliac access vessel demonstrates maximum outer wall diameter less than IFU for device required * Inability to obtain preoperative CTA (contrast allergy, CKD, etc) * Inability to traverse iliac segment with wire * Emergent procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful advancement of planned large bore access deviceDay 1Technical success-defined as successful advancement of planned large bore access device without use of additional adjuncts (stenting, repeat shockwave treatment, high pressure balloon, alternative access pathway)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026