Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Conditions
Keywords
prognostic issues, PET review, MCL
Brief summary
A retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional, imaging study ancillary to FIL\_MCL0208 clinical trial (NCT02354313) in untreated adult patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Detailed description
This is a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional, imaging study devoted to patients diagnosed with MCL and enrolled in the MCL0208 international randomized, phase III clinical trial (NCT02354313). The study is aimed at addressing a number of prognostic issues that still need to be clarified in MCL patients, by taking advantage of the PET performed within the MCL0208 trial and available for the analysis, and the clinical records and molecular data generated in the context of the trial. In the clinical trial PET was optional at baseline (b-PET), before ASCT (i-PET) and after-ASCT (eot-PET), and none of the exams was used in the decisionmaking strategy. All the PETs available will be collected and considered for analysis. The study will not require additional treatment or procedures except those required for the MCL0208 trial. The participation of the patient to the MCL0208 trial is a pre-requisite to be involved in this study.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Enrollment of the patient in the MCL0208 clinical trial documented by the signature of the study informed consent; * Patient's treatment in one of the centers that participated in the MCL0208 trial and that has joined the MCL0208-PET study as well; * Evidence of signed informed consent for the MCL0208-PET study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (proportion) and agreement (Cohen K) of PET results (performed in different time points) compared to the current standard (TC plus bone marrow biopsy). | 24 months | To better define the role of PET for the staging of MCL patients at the time of diagnosis, for evaluation of response after induction treatment (pre-ASCT; i-PET) and post ASCT (eot-PET) in comparison to the current standards, namely computed axial tomography (CT) and bone marrow biopsy. |
| C-index, estimated comparing models adding or not PET parameters to standard prognostic factors in predicting PFS. | 24months | To build a new prognostic model for PFS, including PET parameters, MIPI-b and biological data (e.g. MRD, GEP and mutational parameters).The achievement of these objectives could help to plan futures studies in order to improve the outcome of MCL patients. |
Countries
Italy, Portugal
Contacts
Ematologia e Centro Trapianto Midollo Osseo, Ospedale di Bolzano, Italy