Skip to content

Evaluating the Effect of a Written Action Plan on Comfort and Understanding of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Evaluating the Effect of a Written Action Plan on Comfort and Understanding of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04600375
Enrollment
22
Registered
2020-10-23
Start date
2020-10-20
Completion date
2020-12-07
Last updated
2022-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to evaluate if a written action plan for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) will help patients with hidradenitis suppurativa gain a better understanding of the condition and how to manage the condition on a daily basis compared to a routine verbal consultation.

Interventions

Verbal consultation only without written information before receiving written action plan

Written handout of treatment plan and disease management strategies

Sponsors

University of Arkansas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* This study will only enroll subjects between the ages of 18-years and 89-years of age. * Diagnosis of HS by a board-certified dermatologist * Able to read and comprehend study materials * No prior exposure to written HS action plans

Exclusion criteria

* Those who do not fit the inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visits to High-cost Care Settings [ Time Frame: 1.5 Months ]Through study completion, an average of 1.5 monthsNumber of visits to ER, urgent care, or hospitalizations because of HS

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Verbal Consultation, Then Written Action Plan
CONTROL GROUP 1. Survey A 2. Routine clinic visit 3. Verbal consultation only 4. Survey B 5. Verbal consultation AND Written Action Plan 6. Survey C Verbal consultation: Verbal consultation only without written information before receiving written action plan Written Action Plan: Written handout of treatment plan and disease management strategies
12
Experimental: Written Action Plan
INTERVENTION GROUP 1. Survey A 2. Routine clinic visit 3. Verbal consultation AND Written Action Plan 4. Survey C Written Action Plan: Written handout of treatment plan and disease management strategies
10
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental: Written Action PlanTotalVerbal Consultation, Then Written Action Plan
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
33.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
32.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants22 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants17 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants5 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Visits to High-cost Care Settings [ Time Frame: 1.5 Months ]

Number of visits to ER, urgent care, or hospitalizations because of HS

Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1.5 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Verbal Consultation, Then Written Action PlanVisits to High-cost Care Settings [ Time Frame: 1.5 Months ]0 Participants
Experimental: Written Action PlanVisits to High-cost Care Settings [ Time Frame: 1.5 Months ]0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026