Skip to content

Pregabalin Treatment for Trigger Points

Effectiveness of Pregabalin Treatment for Trigger Points in Patients With Comorbid Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04600037
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-10-23
Start date
2014-04-26
Completion date
2015-01-26
Last updated
2020-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Keywords

fibromyalgia, trigger point, myofascial pain, pregabalin

Brief summary

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common problem in the general population. MPS should not be a local/peripheral painful syndrome and considered to be a syndrome of central sensitivity. We aimed to investigate the effect of pregabalin in patients with MPS in this study

Detailed description

We randomized 40 patients into two groups, and 17 patients per group completed the study. Patients in group I received pregabalin and exercise therapy, whereas those in group II received exercise therapy alone. All patients were evaluated as follows: for pain by VAS; trigger-point pressure pain threshold-(PPT) by algometry; neuropathic pain using DN4 and quality of life with the SF36. Evaluations were performed pretreatment and at the end of the first and third months of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGPregabalin 150mg

Patients in group I received pregabalin at a dose of 75 mg twice daily during the first week that was increased to 150 mg twice daily thereafter and maintained at that level for 12 weeks. Patients in two groups received exercise therapy (stretching exercises for the trapezius muscle). Patients were instructed to perform 10 repetitions three times a day., 3 months

Sponsors

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who diagnosed fibromyalgia syndrome, * Patients who were also diagnosed as cervical myofascial pain syndrome based on the upper trapezius muscle

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had received dry needling or local anesthetic injection to trigger point in the dominant upper trapezius muscle within 3 months of the start of the study. * renal insufficiency, * impaired liver function, * malignancy, * pregnancy * infections, * history of drug or alcohol abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scale (VAS)3 monthsVAS is psychometric measuring instrument designed to document the characteristics of disease-related symptom severity in each patient and use this to achieve a rapid classification of symptom severity and disease control. Patients were instructed to rate their pain between 0 and 10
Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) assessment3 monthsWe assessed PPTs in upper trapezius trigger points with an algometer in all patients. PPT is defined as the minimal amount of pressure required to change a sensation of pressure to pain. An electronic algometer (Baseline Push Pull Force Gauge) was used, which consisted of a metal piston with a 1-cm circular rubber tip. Pressure measurements were recorded as kilograms per square centimeter (kg/cm2) with the patient in a seated position. The algometer was placed at a selected trigger point with the metal rod perpendicular to the surface of the skin, the pressure applied to the muscles was increased at a rate of approximately 1 kg per second, and the patient was instructed to state when pain was perceived. This procedure was repeated three times per patient, with 1-minute intervals. The mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) was calculated and used for the main analysis. If trigger points were in both upper trapezius muscle, the dominant side was evaluated.
DN4 - Questionnaire (DN4)3 monthsDN4 was used to evaluate neuropathic pain. DN4 is used to identify neuropathic pain and consists of ten questions. Seven questions are concerned with symptoms and three are concerned with clinical findings. Symptoms assessed are burning, painful cold, electric shocks, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The physician assesses whether there is reduced sensation (hypoesthesia) to touch or pinprick, and if light brushing increases or causes pain (allodynia) by examination. Each item is scored yes (1 point) or no (0 points). If the total score is ≥4, the pain is likely to be neuropathic
Short Form-36 (SF36)3 monthsThe SF36 is a self-reported questionnaire widely used to measure quality of life. The questions are summarized into eight scales: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The initial four items form the physical component summary measuring physical health domains, while the latter four items form the mental component summary measuring mental health domains. Scores can range from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status) per domain. Higher scores indicate better health status for the calculated sub item

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026