Skip to content

A Study of PTR-01 in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

A Phase 2 Open-Label Study of PTR-01 in Patients With Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04599881
Enrollment
6
Registered
2020-10-23
Start date
2020-10-15
Completion date
2021-09-01
Last updated
2021-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Keywords

RDEB

Brief summary

Protocol PTR-01-002 is a 3-part Phase 2, open-label study of PTR-01. While new patients will be enrolled, priority will be given to patients that satisfactorily completed study PTR-01-001.

Detailed description

Protocol PTR-01-002 is a 3-part Phase 2, open-label study of PTR-01. While new patients will be enrolled, priority will be given to patients that satisfactorily completed study PTR-01-001. In Part 1, patients will receive a dose of 3.0 mg/kg every week for a total of 4 doses. This will be followed by Part 2 in which patients will receive a dose of 3.0 mg/kg every other week for a total of 7 doses. In Part 3, patients will be followed for 12 weeks. No investigational therapy will be administered during this time. At the end of each dosing period, an efficacy assessment will be performed. Safety will be assessed continuously throughout the study. Following the end of Part 3, patients may be eligible for a potential long-term extension to further refine the dosing regimen, depending upon study drug availability.

Interventions

DRUGPTR-01

IV recombinant collagen 7 at 3 mg/kg given weekly for 4 doses, followed by bi-weekly for 7 doses

Sponsors

Phoenix Tissue Repair, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Open-label

Intervention model description

Open-label study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for study participation in the three month run in period of the study: 1. Willing to provide informed consent form, or if 12 to \<18 years of age, legal guardian has provided informed consent form and the minor has signed an assent form acknowledging that they understand and agree to study procedures. 2. Has a diagnosis of RDEB based on genetic analysis and consistent with a recessive inheritance pattern. 3. Has deficient C7 staining at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) by IF. 4. Agrees to use contraception as follows: For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) agrees to use highly effective contraceptive (including abstinence) methods from Screening, through the study, and for at least 10 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Non-childbearing potential is defined as a female who meets either of the following criteria: age ≥50 years and no menses for at least 1 year or documented hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy. For males, agrees to use a condom with any WOCBP sexual partner from Day 1 of study treatment, through the study, and at least 10 weeks after the last dose of study drug. 5. Be willing and able to comply with this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with any of the following will be excluded from participation in the study: 1. Has known systemic hypersensitivity to any of the inactive ingredients in PTR-01. 2. Has previously had an anaphylactic reaction to PTR-01. 3. Is pregnant or nursing. 4. Has received in the last six months any investigational gene therapy product or in the last three months any non-gene therapy investigational products. 5. Is anticipated to receive new regimens of antibiotics or other anti-infectives during the trial. 6. Has any other medical or personal condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may potentially compromise the safety or compliance of the patient, or may preclude the patient's

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse eventsUp to 162 daysSafety and tolerability, as assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events
Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA)Up to 162 daysSafety and tolerability, as assessed by immunogenicity through anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing
Wound healingUp to 162 daysChange in a majority of target lesions of at least 2 levels using a 7-point (1-7) Global Impression of Change instrument (7 being the worst)
Incidence of infusion-associated reactionsUp to 162 daysSafety and tolerability, as assessed by infusion-associated reactions (IAR)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in wound surface area, as assessed by Investigator Global Impression of Change (IGIC)Up to 162 daysWound area of target lesions, as assessed by IGIC
Change in total body wound surface areaUp to 162 daysChange in total body wound surface area, using Rule of Nines
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by suction blister timeUp to 162 daysChange in skin integrity, as assessed by suction blister time
Change in skin integrity, as assessed by time to re-blisteringUp to 162 daysChange in skin integrity, as assessed by time to re-blistering
Change in itch severity, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) itch domainsUp to 162 daysSeverity of itch, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) itch domains
Change in overall quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaireUp to 162 daysChange in overall quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa (QOLEB) questionnaire
Change in itch severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB)Up to 162 daysSeverity of itch, as assessed by Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB), maximum score of 234 (worst)
Change in the impact of itch on quality of lifeUp to 162 daysChange in the impact of itch on quality of life, as assessed by the Pruritus-Specific Quality of Life Instrument (ItchyQoL), maximum score of 110 (worst)
Change in pain severity, as assessed by modified Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain domainsUp to 162 daysChange in pain severity, as assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain domains
Change in pain severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB)Up to 162 daysChange in pain severity, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical, maximum score of 234 (worst)
Change in the impact of pain on quality of lifeUp to 162 daysChange in the impact of pain on quality of life, as assessed by the Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) instrument, maximum score of 234 (worst)
Change of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia QuestionnaireUp to 162 daysChange of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, maximum score is 40 (worst)
Change in dysphagia, as assessed by volume of oral nutritional intakeUp to 162 daysChange of dysphagia, as assessed by volume of oral nutritional intake, using patient interview and diary, maximum score is 40 (worst)
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia ScaleUp to 162 daysStabilization of dysphagia, as assessed using the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Scale
Stabilization of dysphagia, as assessed by volume oral nutritional intakeUp to 162 daysStabilization of dysphagia, as assessed by volume oral nutritional intake, using patient interview and diary
Change in corneal symptomsUp to 162 daysChange of corneal symptoms (eye symptoms), as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI)
Stabilization of corneal symptomsUp to 162 daysStabilization of corneal symptoms (eye symptoms), as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Eye Disease Index (EB-EDI)
Rate of change in nutritional markers (hemoglobin/hematocrit)Up to 162 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by hemoglobin/hematocrit
Rate of change in nutritional markers (total protein/albumin)Up to 162 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by total protein/albumin
Rate of change in nutritional markers (iron/TIBC)Up to 162 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by iron/TIBC
Rate of change in nutritional markers (C-reactive protein)Up to 162 daysChange of nutritional markers, as assessed by C-reactive protein
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (hemoglobin/hematocrit)Up to 162 daysStabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by hemoglobin/hematocrit
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (total protein/albumin)Up to 162 daysStabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by total protein/albumin
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (iron/TIBC)Up to 162 daysStabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by iron/TIBC
Rate of stabilization of nutritional markers (C-reactive protein)Up to 162 daysStabilization of nutritional markers, as assessed by C-reactive protein
Change in Investigator Global Impressions of Change (IGIC)Up to 162 daysGlobal impressions of change, as assessed through IGIC (1-7), 7 being worst
Change in Investigator Patient Impressions of Change (PGIC)Up to 162 daysGlobal impressions of change, as assessed through PGIC (1-7), 7 being worst
Change in disease activity and scarringUp to 162 daysChange in disease activity and scarring, as assessed by the Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI)
Change in overall healthUp to 162 daysChange in overall disability, as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire or Children's Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ/CHAQ)
Change in mental healthUp to 162 daysChange in mental health and social functioning, as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental health domains
Change in social functionUp to 162 daysChange in mental health and social functioning, as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) social function domains
Change in amount of wound careUp to 162 daysChange in amount of wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in time for wound careUp to 162 daysUp to 162 daysChange in time for wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in cost of wound careUp to 162 daysChange in cost of wound care, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in overall patient impression of disabilityUp to 162 daysChange in overall disability, as assessed by patient interviews
Change in overall patient impression of quality of lifeUp to 162 daysChange in overall quality of life, as assessed by patient interviews
Delivery of PTR-01 to skinUp to 162 daysPTR-01 incorporation by immunofluorescence using NC1 & NC2 staining, by dose frequency period
Formation of anchoring fibrilsUp to 162 daysFormation of new anchoring fibrils as measured by electron microscopy
Change in wound surface area, as assessed by wound imagingUp to 162 daysWound area of target lesions, as assessed by wound imaging

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Genotype/phenotype relationshipsUp to 162 daysCorrelation between genotype (genetic mutation) and severity of disease
Impact of pharmacokinetics on pharmacodynamic outcomesUp to 162 daysCorrelate Cmax and AUC with suction blister time, C7 immunofluorescence on biopsy and formation of anchoring fibrils by electron microscopy
Impact of pharmacokinetics on efficacy outcomesUp to 162 daysCorrelate Cmax and AUC with wound healing
Impact of pharmacokinetics on safety outcomesUp to 162 daysCorrelate Cmax and Area Under the Curve (AUC) with treatment emergent adverse events, infusion associated reactions and immune-mediated reactions

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026