Skip to content

Utility of the Evaluation of Blood Flow of the Remnant Esophagus in Esophagectomy With Pedicled Jejunum Reconstruction

Utility of the Evaluation of Blood Flow With Indocyanine Green in Setting the Anastomosis Site of the Remnant Esophagus in Esophagectomy With Pedicled Jejunum Reconstruction: A Case Series

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04597398
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-10-22
Start date
2012-04-01
Completion date
2020-07-30
Last updated
2020-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophagectomy

Keywords

Esophageal reconstructive surgery, Remnant esophagus,

Brief summary

Pedicled jejunal flap can be utilized with various tips for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a history of gastrectomy, or those who have undergone synchronous esophagogastrectomy, although the rate of anastomosis leakage is high with this technique. Therefore, in the current study, we considered the utility of the evaluation of blood flow of the remnant esophagus with indocyanine green in setting the anastomosis site. We included 50 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with pedicled jejunal flap between April 2012 and June 2020. From June 2019, the blood flow of not only the pedicled jejunum, but also the remnant esophagus were evaluated in order to set the anastomosis site of the latter because the color was not definitive criteria for judging in surgery on the remnant esophagus. Usually, the second and third jejunal vessels are transected, and if the jejunal flap cannot reach to the anastomosis point, we actively transect the marginal vessels in order to stretch the jejunal flap. Microvascular anastomosis between the jejunal branches (the second) and the internal thoracic vessels is usually made, and the anastomosis site is set at the part of the esophagus that is well-dyed with indocyanine green. A total of 39 patients underwent the procedure prior to June 2019 ( Group A), and 11 patients underwent the procedure as of June 2019 (Group B). No significant difference was found in the patients' background, type of preoperative therapy, and presence or absence of ligation of marginal vessels and two-stage operation between the two groups. Group A had 16 cases of anastomosis leakage, while Group B only has one (P \< 0.05). There were no cases of significant pedicled jejunum graft necrosis. Our findings demonstrate that the evaluation of the blood flow of the remnant esophagus during setting of the anastomosis site may decrease the rate of anastomosis.

Interventions

DEVICEEvaluation of blood flow with indocyanine green

Sponsors

Shizuoka Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with pedicled jejunal flap between April 2012 and June 2020

Exclusion criteria

* patients who did not complete the esophagectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
anastomosis leakage1months after surgerythe rate of anastomosis leakage between remnant esophagus and pedicled jejunum

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026