Skip to content

The Effect of Minocycline and N-acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

The Effect of Minocycline and N-acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: a Double-blind, Randomized, Crossover Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04594733
Enrollment
14
Registered
2020-10-20
Start date
2021-12-06
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

Evaluation of the effect of combinatorial treatment of fibromyalgia patients (standard of care + minocycline + N-acetylcysteine (NAC) relative to standard of care on subjective pain measurement Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR).

Interventions

DRUGminocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily) followed by placebo

minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily) followed by placebo

DRUGPlacebo followed by minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily)

Placebo followed by minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily)

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

• A simple randomization method will be used to assign the initial treatment and then the opposite treatment will ensure for the second treatment period. Patients will be randomized to (i) 8 weeks of placebo, minimum 2 week washout period, and then 8 weeks of a combination minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily) followed by a final 2 week washout or (ii) 8 weeks of a combination minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily), minimum 2 week washout period, and then 8 weeks of placebo followed by a final 2 week washout.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Age 18 years or older * Diagnosis of fibromyalgia for at least 6 months (confirmed by the modified 2010 ACR Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia Widespread Pain Inventory and Symptom Severity Scale) * Currently on birth control or unable to become pregnant * Willingness to avoid taking opioid and opiate medications during the duration of the study (5-6 months)

Exclusion criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to minocycline or tetracycline antibiotics or to N-acetylcysteine * Current opioid therapy or planned initiation of opioid therapy * Active pregnancy, lactation or plans to become pregnant in the next 6 months * Significant hepatic disease as indicated by an AST or ALT greater than twice the upper limits of normal or bilirubin greater than twice the upper limits of normal * Significant renal disease as indicated by an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at baseline or during the first washout period * History of autoimmune syndromes (systemic lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, rheumatoid arthritis, * History of intracranial hypertension or pseudotumor cerebri * History of IBD (Crohns disease, ulcerative colitis), Clostridium difficile infection * History of esophagitis, esophageal obstruction, achalasia or esophageal dysmotility * History of GI hemorrhage or known risk factors for GI hemorrhage, such as esophageal varices, peptic ulcer disease, etc. * Subjects taking divalent and trivalent cations such as oral iron supplements, certain dietary supplements (multivitamins) that contain manganese or zinc, or antacids that contain aluminum, calcium, or magnesium, which would decrease minocycline absorption * Subjects taking anticoagulant medication since minocycline can decrease plasma prothrombin activity * Subjects taking isotretinoin * Subject taking ergot alkaloids for migraines * Subjects taking penicillin antibiotics * Subjects taking methoxyflurane containing products * Subjects who work outdoors or otherwise have prolonged exposure to UV light and sunlight * Lack of access to reliable technology to be able to complete emailed REDCap questionnaires * Cognitive deficits that may make it difficult to adhere to the medication regimen or provide consistent and timely completion of questionnaires * Inability or unwillingness to give informed consent * Unwillingness to use two forms of birth control for the entire duration of participation in the study (if capable of becoming pregnant) * Unwillingness to complete home pregnancy tests throughout the study (if capable of becoming pregnant) * Inability to swallow large pills

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18The FIQR (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) is comprised of 21 questions spread across 3 domains: function, overall impact, symptoms, scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The questions are framed with the context of the past 7 days. The instructions ask the patient to rate the difficulty on a scale of 0-10 (0 = No difficulty, and 10 = Very difficult) which indicates how much difficulty they have experienced in doing the specified activity during the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 - 10, and the raw scores on each subscale. Then, the score on the function subscale is divided by 3, the overall impact subscale divided by 1, and the symptoms subscale divided by 2. These final scores from each subscale are then added up for the total FIQR score The total score can range from 0 -100. The total FIQR score is the sum of each section. A lower score means a better outcome. Higher scores indicate more severe impact.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) Scale From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18In the PEG score, a higher score indicates more severe pain and pain-related interference. The PEG has 3 separate numerical scales. Each has ratings 0-10.The first scale asks individuals to rate their pain, on average, over the past week, the second asks to rate how pain has interfered with their enjoyment of life in the past week, the third asks individuals to rate how pain has interfered with general activities. The PEG scale is scored by averaging the three numbers. The final score helps to track and monitor pain levels over time. The PEG score should decrease when treatment is effective.
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18The change in depression scale (PHQ-2) by evaluating the number of days the participant feels down, depressed or hopeless and has little interest or pleasure in doing things rated as not at all (0), several days (1), more than half the days (2), or nearly every day (3) by scoring the 2 questions from 0-3 as indicated. Scores range from 0-6, with the higher score meaning the patient experiencing more severe symptoms.
Change in General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) screens for generalized anxiety disorder 1. Two questions are asked, with the scoring of each ranging from 0-3, then both numbers added together, with possible scores ranging from 0-6. A total score of at least 3 points indicates possible anxiety disorder. The higher the score, the more severe anxiety.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)immediately after each treatment at week 8 (first intervention) and week 18 (second intervention)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) has the subject will reporting whether there was a change in their activity, limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life by rating no change, almost the same, a little better, somewhat better, moderately better, better or a great deal better. Participants will also rate degrees of change from much better (0), 5 (no change), to much worse (10). The higher the score, the worse their impression of their health status was worse than previously. Scores will range from no change to a great deal better, and from 0 (much better) to 10 (much worse).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia (Modified ACR 2010)Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18Participants will rate change using modified 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia (modified ACR 2010) by answering questions related to their areas of pain, amount of medication required for pain, and symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo Followed by Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily)
Participants will be randomized to 8 weeks of placebo, minimum 2 week washout period, and then 8 weeks of a combination minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily) followed by a final 2 week washout Placebo followed by minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily): Placebo followed by minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily)
7
Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Followed by Placebo
Participants will be randomized to 8 weeks of a combination minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily), minimum 2 week washout period, and then 8 weeks of placebo followed by a final 2 week washout minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily) followed by placebo: minocycline (200 mg daily) and NAC (1200 mg daily) followed by placebo
7
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Intervention (8 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up03
First Intervention (8 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject01
Second Intervention (8 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo Followed by Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily)Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Followed by PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.98
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Duration of Formal Diagnosis
0-1 years
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Duration of Formal Diagnosis
>10 years
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Duration of Formal Diagnosis
1-2 years
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Duration of Formal Diagnosis
3-5 years
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Duration of Formal Diagnosis
5-10 years
4 participants3 participants7 participants
Duration of Symptoms
>10 years
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Duration of Symptoms
1-2 years
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Duration of Symptoms
3-5 years
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Duration of Symptoms
5-10 years
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score67.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
58.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
63.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2 (GAD-2) Score2 units on a scale2 units on a scale2 units on a scale
Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) Score4 units on a scale2 units on a scale2 units on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Symptom Severity Score (SS score) - Part 2a7 units on a scale5 units on a scale6 units on a scale
Symptom Severity (SS) 2b Score1 units on a scale2 units on a scale1.5 units on a scale
The Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) Score7.29 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
6.90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
7.10 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
Total Symptom Severity (SS) Score8.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
7.14 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.34
7.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.18
Widespread Pain Index (WPI) Score14.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
10.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.12
12.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.31

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 108 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18

The FIQR (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) is comprised of 21 questions spread across 3 domains: function, overall impact, symptoms, scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The questions are framed with the context of the past 7 days. The instructions ask the patient to rate the difficulty on a scale of 0-10 (0 = No difficulty, and 10 = Very difficult) which indicates how much difficulty they have experienced in doing the specified activity during the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 - 10, and the raw scores on each subscale. Then, the score on the function subscale is divided by 3, the overall impact subscale divided by 1, and the symptoms subscale divided by 2. These final scores from each subscale are then added up for the total FIQR score The total score can range from 0 -100. The total FIQR score is the sum of each section. A lower score means a better outcome. Higher scores indicate more severe impact.

Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo Treatment PeriodChange in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 184.37 Score
Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Treatment PeriodChange in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 1812.1 Score
Secondary

Change in General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) screens for generalized anxiety disorder 1. Two questions are asked, with the scoring of each ranging from 0-3, then both numbers added together, with possible scores ranging from 0-6. A total score of at least 3 points indicates possible anxiety disorder. The higher the score, the more severe anxiety.

Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo Treatment PeriodChange in General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18-0.02 score on a scale
Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Treatment PeriodChange in General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) Score From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 180.72 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) Scale From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18

In the PEG score, a higher score indicates more severe pain and pain-related interference. The PEG has 3 separate numerical scales. Each has ratings 0-10.The first scale asks individuals to rate their pain, on average, over the past week, the second asks to rate how pain has interfered with their enjoyment of life in the past week, the third asks individuals to rate how pain has interfered with general activities. The PEG scale is scored by averaging the three numbers. The final score helps to track and monitor pain levels over time. The PEG score should decrease when treatment is effective.

Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo Treatment PeriodChange in Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) Scale From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 180.64 score on a scale
Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Treatment PeriodChange in Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) Scale From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 181.24 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 18

The change in depression scale (PHQ-2) by evaluating the number of days the participant feels down, depressed or hopeless and has little interest or pleasure in doing things rated as not at all (0), several days (1), more than half the days (2), or nearly every day (3) by scoring the 2 questions from 0-3 as indicated. Scores range from 0-6, with the higher score meaning the patient experiencing more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Placebo Treatment PeriodChange in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 180.12 score on a scale
Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Treatment PeriodChange in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) From Baseline to After Treatment Occurring at Weeks 8 and 180.23 score on a scale
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) has the subject will reporting whether there was a change in their activity, limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life by rating no change, almost the same, a little better, somewhat better, moderately better, better or a great deal better. Participants will also rate degrees of change from much better (0), 5 (no change), to much worse (10). The higher the score, the worse their impression of their health status was worse than previously. Scores will range from no change to a great deal better, and from 0 (much better) to 10 (much worse).

Time frame: immediately after each treatment at week 8 (first intervention) and week 18 (second intervention)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo Treatment PeriodPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Minocycline (200 mg Daily) and NAC (1200 mg Daily) Treatment PeriodPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Other Pre-specified

Modified 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia (Modified ACR 2010)

Participants will rate change using modified 2010 American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia (modified ACR 2010) by answering questions related to their areas of pain, amount of medication required for pain, and symptoms.

Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (prior to intervention) then again after treatment which occurs at week 8 and week 18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026