Skip to content

Two Different Tactile Stimulus Methods

A Comparison of Two Different Tactile Stimulus Methods on Reducing Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04594083
Enrollment
159
Registered
2020-10-20
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2020-02-07
Last updated
2021-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

pain management, child, nursing practice, Intramuscular Injection

Brief summary

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the ShotBlocker and Palm Stimulator, developed by researchers for reducing pain during intramuscular (IM) injections in children.

Detailed description

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the ShotBlocker and Palm Stimulator, developed by researchers for reducing pain during intramuscular (IM) injections in children. Design: The study was conducted via a randomized controlled design. Setting: The study population consisted of children in the seven to 10 age group admitted to the emergency department of a public hospital (Kahta State Hospital) between February 2019 and July 2019 and who received an IM injection as part of the medical treatment. Interventions: The study data were collected from the children, who were divided into Palm Stimulator, ShotBlocker, and control groups. Main outcome measures: The children's pre-procedure fear levels were evaluated using the Children's Fear Scale (CFS), and their pain levels during the procedure were evaluated using the Facial Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). The children also reported injection-related pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Interventions

The Palm Stimulator, developed by the present researchers for the first time, is 1.6 cm in diameter, 4 cm in length, and has a cylindrical, non-slippery structure for an easy grip to ensure maximum contact with the palm The Palm Stimulator consists of blunt protrusions that will provide a tactile stimulus on the palm. The blunt protrusions do not penetrate into the skin. The simulator design is based on the gate-control theory, which allows for a reduction in the perceived amount of pain experienced during injection by closing the pain gate in the spinal cord in creating a stimulus on the skin.

DEVICEShotBlocker

ShotBlocker was placed in the ventrogluteal area properly 20 seconds before injection. It was fixed at the injection site until the injection process was completed.

Sponsors

Adiyaman University Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized, controlled, and experimental design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

children who * had no diagnosed physical or mental disability or chronic illness; * had no communication problems; * received single injection, * required Ampicillin + Sulbactam group of antibiotics for standardization; and * received ventrogluteal muscle injection during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Parents who were unable to collaborate in the fear and pain evaluation, * overweight or underweight children (under the third or above the 97th percentile), * children with any incision or scar tissue in the injection area, * children who received a sedative, analgesic, or narcotic drugs (based on expert opinion) six hours before the procedure on the basis of parental statements and medical history

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Children's Fear Scale (CFS)5 monthsThe Children's Fear Scale (CFS) is a scale used to assess the level of anxiety in children. The scale is a visual measurement tool with scores ranging from 0-4 points. It consists of five facial expressions, ranging from a neutral to a frightened expression, and is suitable for use with children aged 5-10 years (Inan & Inal, 2019; McMurtry, Noel, Chambers, & McGrath, 2011; Özalp Gerçeker, Ayar, Özdemir, & Bektaş, 2018). The evaluation of the Turkish psychometric properties of the scale, which was developed by McMurty et al. for paediatric patients, was conducted by Özalp Gerçeker et al. (2018), and the scale was translated into the Turkish language (Özalp Gerçeker et al., 2018). The CFS has demonstrated good evidence of test-retest (r = 0.76, p \< 0.001), and inter-rater (0.51, P \< 0.001) reliability, as well as construct validity, (rs ¼ when used with children (McMurtry vd., 2011).
Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R)5 monthsThe Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS) is a scale used to assess the level of pain in children in the 4-12 age group (Hicks, Von Baeyer, Spafford, Van Korlaar, & Goodenough, 2001). There are facial expressions that show the increasing levels of pain severity from left to right in the scale. Rated according to the severity of pain (between 0-10 points), the leftmost face refers to no pain, and the rightmost face refers to too much pain, comprising a total of six facial expressions. The faces exhibit an increase in pain severity to correspond with the scores 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 from left to right, respectively (Mohamed Mohamed Tork, 2017).
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)5 monthsThe VAS consists of a horizontal or vertical ruler 10 cm/100 mm in length, with the phrase no pain on one end and the worst pain imaginable on the other. The child is asked to mark the point on this line that most accurately reflects his/her pain. The distance between the child's mark and the left end of the scale is measured in cm and recorded as points. It has been suggested that the widely researched scale should be used for children aged seven and older (Çelik & Khorshid, 2015; Sivri Bilgen & Balcı, 2019).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026