Skip to content

Teledermatology vs. Face-to-Face Visits in the Follow-Up of Patients With Acne

Randomized Open-Label Trial Comparing Teledermatology vs. Face-to-Face Consultation in the Follow-Up of Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Acne

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04593004
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2020-10-07
Completion date
2022-06-20
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Keywords

acne, telemedicine, teledermatology

Brief summary

Acne vulgaris is a common cutaneous inflammatory condition of sebaceous follicles that can profoundly affect patients' quality of life, especially at a young age. In this context the use of teledermatology can potentially reduce the healthcare costs associated to traditional consultations as well as the costs related to travel and loss of school/working time for the patient, with a clear benefit for the whole community. Since 2016, the Department of Dermatology at Inselspital Hospital in Bern has a portal and a smartphone app for online advice service. Hereby the investigators propose to explicitly investigate the efficacy of this system in reducing healthcare costs as compared to traditional face-to-face consultations, in a cohort of patients with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris.

Interventions

Patients will be assessed and followed-up by trained physicians through a store-and-forward system (teledermatology online service - Evita® app), which allows patients to upload pictures of skin areas affected by acne as well as their symptoms or questions related to their disease.

Patients will be assessed and followed-up by trained physicians through regular face-to-face outpatient consultations.

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

1:1 stratified random allocation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 28 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Given written informed consent * Mild-to-moderate acne as assessed by IGA scale * Willingness and ability to adhere the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Need for systemic therapy for acne with Isotretinoin * Inability to use the teledermatology system

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total time spent by dermatologist after baseline4 monthsTotal cumulative time spent by dermatologist for face-to-face consultations or online assessments after baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total time spent by patient after baseline4 monthsTotal cumulative time spent by patient for visit-related travels and/or online procedures after baseline.
Acne severity improvement2, 4 and 6 monthsAcne severity improvement from baseline as assessed by 5-point ordinal investigator's global assessment (IGA) scale, ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Number of therapies prescribed for acne2, 4 and 6 months
Patient study satisfaction6 monthsOverall patient satisfaction regarding the service received during the study as assessed by 11-point anchored visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Patient quality of life improvement6 monthsPatient quality of life improvement from baseline as assessed by dermatology life quality index (DLQI), ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026