Skip to content

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Rehabilitation Protocol With FES Cycling in Persons With Complete SCI

FES Cycling Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Rehabilitation for Persons Affected by Complete Spinal Cord Injury, an Experience From Two Italian Hospitals

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04592679
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2020-07-21
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Spinal Cord Injury, FESD, Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord Injuries

Brief summary

20 patients were recruited by two hospitals (AOUP and AOUC) in Italy from January 2015 to January 2018. The participants have been addressed to two different groups: the ones recruited by the AOUP were submitted to an experimental protocol of rehabilitation with FES Cycling, the ones recruited by the AOUC were submitted to a standard protocol of manual mobilization. The primary outcome was the thigh circumferences measured at 4 different levels (5-10-15-20 cm) from the superior margin of the patella, while the secondary outcomes were the muscle tone evaluated with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and the sensation of pain registered with International Spinal Cord Injury - Pain Basic Data Set (ISCI-P). From these outcomes the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) was obtained. The costs of the two treatments were calculated through a consultation process with the Competent Offices of the two hospitals. The QALYs and the costs were used to calculate the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) in order to verify the cost-effectiveness ratio of the two treatments.

Interventions

DEVICEFES-C

The participants were submitted to 20 sessions of FES-C three/five times per week. Each session lasted about 30'.

OTHERStandard Treatment

The participants were submitted to 20 sessions of standard rehabilitation for lower limbs with manual mobilization, three/five times per week. Each session lasted about 30'.

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* complete spinal cord injury * loss of gait function * any episode of autonomic dysreflexia * any important range of motion limitation to hips, knees or ankles * eccitability of the muscles * FES tollerability

Exclusion criteria

* cognitive deficits * psychiatric diseases * cancer * recent fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio3 yearsQALYs/costs of the two treatments, the ICER could variate from -100'000 to 100'000 QALYs/€
Thigh Circumferences3 yearsThe primary outcome was the thigh circumferences measured at 4 different levels (5-10-15-20 cm) from the superior margin of the patella, the raging of the improvement could be from 0 to 50 cm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)3 yearsIt consists in the use of a scale 0 (death) - 1 (the best possible state of health) for the improvements of the patients
Costs3 yearsthe costs of the two treatments could variate from 0 to 50'000 €
Muscle tone3 yearsMuscle tone evaluated with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), 0-5 points, an higher result means more spasticity
Sensation of pain3 yearsSensation of pain evaluated with International Spinal Cord Injury - Pain Basic Data Set 0-30 points, an higher result means more sensation of pain (ISCI-P).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026