Skip to content

Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Monalizumab Plus Cetuximab Compared to Placebo Plus Cetuximab in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Global Study of Monalizumab or Placebo in Combination With Cetuximab in Participants With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Previously Treated With an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04590963
Acronym
INTERLINK-1
Enrollment
370
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2020-10-02
Completion date
2026-09-24
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Keywords

head and neck cancer, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, monalizumab, cetuximab, Erbitux, oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, natural killer, oropharynx, hypopharynx

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, global Phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of monalizumab and cetuximab, compared to placebo and cetuximab, in Participants with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

Detailed description

Participants with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy treatment will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to monalizumab and cetuximab or placebo and cetuximab. Efficacy and safety assessments will be performed periodically from the time of enrollment and throughout the study. Participants in all arms will continue therapy until progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion is met. All Participants will be followed for survival after progression is confirmed.

Interventions

DRUGMonalizumab

Participants will receive IV infusion of monalizumab as stated in arm description.

DRUGCetuximab

Participants will receive IV infusion of cetuximab as stated in arm description.

OTHERPlacebo

Participants will receive IV infusion of placebo as stated in arm description.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Innate Pharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blinded study

Intervention model description

Parallel study. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to monalizumab and cetuximab or placebo and cetuximab.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Are aged 18 years and over * Recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the SCCHN, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx which has progressed on or after previous systemic cancer therapy and is not amenable to curative therapy * Received prior treatment using a programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor * Prior platinum failure * Received 1 or 2 prior systemic regimens for recurrent or metastatic SCCHN * Has measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 * A fresh or recently acquired tumor tissue for the purpose of biomarker testing * World Health Organization (WHO)/ Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1

Exclusion criteria

* Head and neck cancer of any primary anatomic location in the head and neck not specified in the inclusion criteria, including participants with SCCHN of unknown primary or non-squamous histologies * Had prior cetuximab therapy (unless it was administered in curative locally advanced setting with radiotherapy and no disease progression for at least 6 months following the last cetuximab dose) * Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (including inflammatory bowel disease \[eg, colitis or Crohn's disease\], diverticulitis * Any concurrent anticancer treatment, except for hormonal therapy for non-cancer-related conditions (eg, hormone replacement therapy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Unrelated Analysis SetBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)The OS is defined as time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). The OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from a stratified log-rank test and hazard ratio (HR) and confidence intervals (CIs) from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on World Health Organization/ Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (WHO/ECOG PS) (0 or 1) and number of prior lines of therapy in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) setting (1 or 2).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival in Full Analysis Set (FAS)Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)The OS is defined as time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). The OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from a stratified log-rank test and HR and CIs from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on HPV status (OPC HPV positive or HPV-unrelated), WHO/ECOG PS (0 or 1) and number of prior lines of therapy in R/M setting (1 or 2).
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in HPV-unrelated Analysis SetBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator is defined as time from randomization until date of RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progressive disease (PD) or death regardless of whether participant withdraws from therapy or received subsequent anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir) and sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs (NTLs) or appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from stratified log-rank test and HR and CIs from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on WHO/ECOG PS (0/1) and no. of prior lines of therapy in R/M setting.
Progression-Free Survival Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in FASBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator is defined as time from randomization until date of RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progressive disease (PD) or death regardless of whether participant withdraws from therapy or received subsequent anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir) and sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs or appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from a stratified log-rank test and HR and CIs from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on HPV status, WHO/ECOG PS (0/1) and no. of prior lines of therapy in R/M setting.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis SetBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)The OR is defined as the percentage of participants with at least one confirmed investigator-assessed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by RECIST 1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis \< 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters (SoD) of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. Percentage of participants with OR is reported. Participants who had measurable disease at baseline per the site investigator were analyzed for this outcome.
Percentage of Participants With OR Per RECIST 1.1 in FASBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)The OR is defined as the percentage of participants with at least one confirmed investigator-assessed response of CR or PR as assessed by RECIST 1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis \< 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. Percentage of participants with OR is reported. Participants who had measurable disease at baseline per the site investigator were analyzed for this outcome.
Duration of Response (DoR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis SetBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)The DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented confirmed response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoDs of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the SoDs of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous SoDs (nadir) and the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs or appearance of new lesions. The DoR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique.
Duration of Response Per RECIST 1.1 in FASBaseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)The DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented confirmed response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoDs of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the SoDs of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous SoDs (nadir) and the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs or appearance of new lesions. The DoR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)Participants with abnormal laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Laboratory analysis included hematology and clinical chemistry. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)Participants with abnormal vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, and respiratory rate) reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)Participants with Abnormal ECGs reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRoger B Cohen, MD

Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJérôme Fayette, MD

Centre Leon Berard

STUDY_DIRECTORDario Ruscica, MD

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at study sites located in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States of America.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 370 participants were randomized (All randomized participants \[ARP\] set) in this study of which 368 participants received treatment. The analyses presented in this report are based on a clinical efficacy data cut-off (DCO) date of 11May2022, and clinical safety DCO date of 01Sep2022.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Participants received IV monalizumab 750 mg Q2W and IV cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 initial dose followed by 250 mg/m\^2 Q1W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met.
247
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Participants receieved IV placebo matched to monalizumab Q2W and IV cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 initial dose followed by 250 mg/m\^2 Q1W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another discontinuation criterion was met.
123
Total370

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2TotalMonalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2
Age, Continuous61.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
62.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants17 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
114 Participants337 Participants223 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants16 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
30 Participants96 Participants66 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
89 Participants258 Participants169 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants71 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
94 Participants299 Participants205 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
120 / 24761 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
213 / 246111 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
77 / 24627 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS) in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Unrelated Analysis Set

The OS is defined as time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). The OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from a stratified log-rank test and hazard ratio (HR) and confidence intervals (CIs) from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on World Health Organization/ Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (WHO/ECOG PS) (0 or 1) and number of prior lines of therapy in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) setting (1 or 2).

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The HPV-unrelated analysis set included all participants who were randomized at least 2 months before the 11May2022 DCO (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022) and were either oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) HPV negative or non OPC regardless of the HPV status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS) in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Unrelated Analysis Set8.8 Months
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Overall Survival (OS) in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Unrelated Analysis Set8.6 Months
p-value: 0.98995% CI: [0.66, 1.537]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set

The DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented confirmed response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoDs of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the SoDs of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous SoDs (nadir) and the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs or appearance of new lesions. The DoR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The HPV-unrelated analysis set included all participants who were randomized at least 2 months before the 11May2022 DCO (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022) and were either OPC HPV negative or non OPC regardless of the HPV status. The DoR is assessed for only those participants who had OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Duration of Response (DoR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set5.7 Months
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Duration of Response (DoR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set5.6 Months
Secondary

Duration of Response Per RECIST 1.1 in FAS

The DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented confirmed response until date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). The CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoDs of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. The PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the SoDs of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous SoDs (nadir) and the sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs or appearance of new lesions. The DoR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique.

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 11May2022 (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022). The DoR is assessed for only those participants who had OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Duration of Response Per RECIST 1.1 in FAS5.7 Months
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Duration of Response Per RECIST 1.1 in FAS5.6 Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs

Participants with abnormal laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Laboratory analysis included hematology and clinical chemistry. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Day 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 01Sep2022 (i.e. on or before 01Jul2022).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia35 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia folate deficiency1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypochromic anaemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsIron deficiency anaemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocytosis3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphocytosis0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutrophilia0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNormocytic anaemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsThrombocytopenia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsThrombocytosis1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperthyroidism0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoparathyroidism1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypothyroidism15 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperamylasaemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercalcaemia7 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperglycaemia7 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperlipasaemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypermagnesaemia3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperphosphataemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoalbuminaemia2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypocalcaemia11 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoglycaemia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia13 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypomagnesaemia42 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia6 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypophosphataemia9 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsIron deficiency1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased7 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAmylase increased6 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased7 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood alkaline phosphatase increased7 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood beta-D-glucan increased0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood bilirubin increased3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatinine increased6 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood iron decreased0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood lactate dehydrogenase increased3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood phosphorus decreased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood potassium decreased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood thyroid stimulating hormone abnormal1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood thyroid stimulating hormone increased2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood urea increased0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased5 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsInflammatory marker increased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsInternational normalised ratio increased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLipase increased12 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphocyte count decreased3 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutrophil count decreased2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutrophil count increased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsPlatelet count decreased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsPlatelet count increased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsTransaminases increased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cell count decreased2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cell count increased1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsDyslipidaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsIron deficiency0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia15 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutrophil count decreased3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia folate deficiency0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypochromic anaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood urea increased1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsIron deficiency anaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased5 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocytosis2 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsTransaminases increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAmylase increased3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphocytosis1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased2 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased4 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutrophil count increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutrophilia2 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood alkaline phosphatase increased3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNormocytic anaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsThrombocytopenia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood beta-D-glucan increased1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsThrombocytosis2 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cell count increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperthyroidism1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoparathyroidism0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsInflammatory marker increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypothyroidism7 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperamylasaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsPlatelet count decreased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercalcaemia4 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatinine increased3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperglycaemia5 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsInternational normalised ratio increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood iron decreased1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperlipasaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsWhite blood cell count decreased3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypermagnesaemia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood lactate dehydrogenase increased3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperphosphataemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLipase increased2 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoalbuminaemia4 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood phosphorus decreased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypocalcaemia4 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsPlatelet count increased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypoglycaemia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood potassium decreased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia9 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphocyte count decreased0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypomagnesaemia21 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood thyroid stimulating hormone abnormal0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsDyslipidaemia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypophosphataemia8 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood thyroid stimulating hormone increased3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Participants with abnormal vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, and respiratory rate) reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Day 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 01Sep2022 (i.e. on or before 01Jul2022).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension11 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypoxia0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia18 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension4 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia10 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension4 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension3 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypoxia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEs

Participants with Abnormal ECGs reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Day 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 01Sep2022 (i.e. on or before 01Jul2022).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsElectrocardiogram QT prolonged1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsArrhythmia0 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsAtrial fibrillation1 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsSinus tachycardia2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsTachycardia2 Participants
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsVentricular arrhythmia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsTachycardia2 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsElectrocardiogram QT prolonged0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsSinus tachycardia0 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsArrhythmia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsVentricular arrhythmia1 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Reported as TEAEsAtrial fibrillation0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs included events from the first dose of study drug, up to 90 days after the last dose of study drug received or up to the start date of any subsequent anticancer therapy following discontinuation of study drug, or the final safety DCO date of 01Sep2022, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Day 1 through 21.4 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 01Sep2022 (i.e. on or before 01Jul2022).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)236 Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)120 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival in Full Analysis Set (FAS)

The OS is defined as time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomized therapy or receives another anti-cancer therapy (i.e. date of death or censoring - date of randomization + 1). The OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from a stratified log-rank test and HR and CIs from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on HPV status (OPC HPV positive or HPV-unrelated), WHO/ECOG PS (0 or 1) and number of prior lines of therapy in R/M setting (1 or 2).

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 11May2022 (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Overall Survival in Full Analysis Set (FAS)8.8 Months
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Overall Survival in Full Analysis Set (FAS)8.9 Months
p-value: 0.89195% CI: [0.704, 1.528]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set

The OR is defined as the percentage of participants with at least one confirmed investigator-assessed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by RECIST 1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis \< 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters (SoD) of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. Percentage of participants with OR is reported. Participants who had measurable disease at baseline per the site investigator were analyzed for this outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The HPV-unrelated analysis set included all participants who were randomized at least 2 months before the 11May2022 DCO (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022) and were either OPC HPV negative or non OPC regardless of the HPV status. Participants who had measurable disease at baseline per the site investigator were analyzed for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set15.2 Percentage of Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per RECIST 1.1 in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set23.9 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.11595% CI: [0.274, 1.154]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With OR Per RECIST 1.1 in FAS

The OR is defined as the percentage of participants with at least one confirmed investigator-assessed response of CR or PR as assessed by RECIST 1.1 guidelines. The CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and NTLs, any pathological lymph nodes (target and non-target) must have reduction in short axis \< 10 mm, and no new lesions. The PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SoD of TLs (compared to baseline) and no new lesions. Confirmation of CR and PR is required by a repeat, consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks from the date of first documentation. Percentage of participants with OR is reported. Participants who had measurable disease at baseline per the site investigator were analyzed for this outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 11May2022 (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022). Participants who had measurable disease at baseline per the site investigator were analyzed for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With OR Per RECIST 1.1 in FAS13.1 Percentage of Participants
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Percentage of Participants With OR Per RECIST 1.1 in FAS19.1 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.16295% CI: [0.297, 1.231]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in FAS

PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator is defined as time from randomization until date of RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progressive disease (PD) or death regardless of whether participant withdraws from therapy or received subsequent anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir) and sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs or appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from a stratified log-rank test and HR and CIs from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on HPV status, WHO/ECOG PS (0/1) and no. of prior lines of therapy in R/M setting.

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The FAS included all participants randomized at least 2 months before the DCO 11May2022 (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Progression-Free Survival Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in FAS3.5 Months
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Progression-Free Survival Per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in FAS3.7 Months
p-value: 0.5395% CI: [0.818, 1.512]Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set

PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator is defined as time from randomization until date of RECIST 1.1-defined radiological progressive disease (PD) or death regardless of whether participant withdraws from therapy or received subsequent anticancer therapy prior to progression. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir) and sum must demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs (NTLs) or appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical analysis was performed using P-value from stratified log-rank test and HR and CIs from a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Analyses were stratified on WHO/ECOG PS (0/1) and no. of prior lines of therapy in R/M setting.

Time frame: Baseline (-28 to -1) through 17.5 months (maximum observed duration)

Population: The HPV-unrelated analysis set included all participants who were randomized at least 2 months before the 11May2022 DCO (i.e. on or before 11Mar2022) and were either OPC HPV negative or non OPC regardless of the HPV status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Monalizumab 750 mg Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set3.6 Months
Placebo Q2W + Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in HPV-unrelated Analysis Set3.8 Months
p-value: 0.57495% CI: [0.79, 1.568]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026