Skip to content

SUrgical Versus PERcutaneous AXillary Artery International Registry

SUrgical Versus PERcutaneous AXillary Artery International Registry A Physician-initiated, International, Multicentric, Retrospective, Observational, Voluntary Registry - SUPER AXA International Registry

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04589962
Enrollment
700
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2020-10-09
Completion date
2022-02-28
Last updated
2022-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical and the Percutaneous Approach to the Upper Extremity Access

Brief summary

The purpose of the Study is to compare the outcomes of the surgical and the percutaneous approach to the upper extremity access (axillary or brachial artery) during endovascular procedures on the aortic valve, the aorta, and its side branches.

Interventions

OTHERaccess axillary or brachial artery

access to the axillary or brachial artery during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Fenestrated/Branched-Endovascular Aortic Repair (F/BEVAR), chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR) or visceral side branches stenting

Sponsors

IRCCS San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who received a surgical or percutaneous access to the axillary or brachial artery during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Fenestrated/Branched-Endovascular Aortic Repair (F/BEVAR), chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR) or visceral side branches stenting, between January 2010 and May 2020 * Adult patients ≥18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Introducer sheath internal diameter (ID) used \< 5F or \> 22F * Patient with previous surgical axillary access on the puncture side (Pacemaker excluded) * Patient with subclavian / axillary / brachial occlusive disease with stenosis greater than 50% * Patient with previous bypass surgery or stent placement in the vicinity of access site (ie. Axillary extracorporeal cannulation with, axillo-femoral bypass, patch (venous or synthetic repair of previous axillary access, etc) * Bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy * Patients with active systemic or cutaneous infection or inflammation * Patients who are pregnant or lactating * Patient younger than 18 years of age * Patients who are morbidity obese (BMI \> 40 Kg/m2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
optimal hemostasis30 daysClosure success rate of the procedure without any adjunctive procedures
vascular complications30 daysfreedom from major access vascular complications requiring adjunctive endovascular or open procedures
Incidence of permanent peripheral nerve injury30 daysfreedom from permanent peripheral nerve injury with functional compromise
stroke Incidenceperiproceduralfreedom from periprocedural stroke
Durability of vessel closure30 daysfreedom from secondary intervention at access site

Countries

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026