Skip to content

Developing and Testing the Opioid Rapid Response System

Developing and Testing the Opioid Rapid Response System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04589676
Enrollment
400
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Overdose

Keywords

Naloxone

Brief summary

This Phase I SBIR will develop and demonstrate the usability/feasibility of the Opioid Rapid Response System (OSSR) in order to reduce deaths and strain on emergency response systems from opioid overdoses.

Detailed description

Opioid overdoses exact a tremendous cost in lives and expenditures due to incredible strain on emergency response systems. Naloxone has been developed to counteract overdoses. However, the nature of these events requires a rapid response, a situation that challenges emergency responders in both lightly populated rural areas as well as densely populated urban communities. PulsePoint has developed an app with the potential to obviate both concerns by linking responders to events through the 911 system. PulsePoint is already in place in 4,000 communities throughout the U.S. However, the app cannot accomplish these goals without being used by a large number of citizen responders who are both able to administer life-saving Naloxone and confident in their ability to do so. This project is designed to develop innovative and effective techniques for filling this gap. We build off of the Clark County Pilot Project conducted by members of our team that developed preliminary recruitment and training protocols for enabling citizen responders to utilize the PulsePoint App. Using communication theory, a technology-based recruitment protocol will be built around appeals to individuals (personal identity appeals) and others (communal appeals). Recruitment messages will be disseminated through diverse media channels, including social media, posters, radio announcement, and work-of-mouth. Social Cognitive Theory will be used to develop both online and face-to-face training to enable users to use the PulsePoint App, safely respond to calls, and administer Naloxone. An unblinded, two-arm, parallel group cluster-randomized trial with non-random cluster sampling will be conducted in two Indiana counties to establish the usability and feasibility of ORRS and its recruitment and training components. We anticipate recruiting and training 400 citizen responders. Pretest and posttest surveys will evaluate the training and as well as recruitment exposure through the various channels. County-level data on the number of events to which participant responded as well as lives saved also will be used to evaluate the intervention. A quasi-experimental design will compare the two recruitment strategies and the two training modalities. Project findings will be used to design and more extensive, two statewide evaluation studies (Indiana and Washington) that examine outcomes in numbers of lives saves as well as conducted a cost effectiveness analyses. The project has great promise for rapid and wide dissemination through the PulsePoint network of communities and has the potential to develop a model for community responses to similar public health events (e.g., coronavirus, stroke, heart failure).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNaloxone training

The naloxone training will teach participants about how to appropriately use naloxone in the event of an opioid overdose.

Sponsors

Indiana University
CollaboratorOTHER
Real Prevention, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

An unblinded, two-arm, parallel group cluster-randomized trial with non-random cluster sampling will be conducted in two Indiana counties to establish the usability and feasibility of ORRS and its recruitment and training components.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Overtly healthy citizen volunteers, aged 18 and over, living in Boone and Hancock Counties of Indiana. * Able to understand/complete questionnaires, recruitment messages, and training procedures in English.

Exclusion criteria

* Those who have a Boone or Hancock County residential address, but temporarily live in another county or State, so are unable to attend training if assigned to face-to-face naloxone training. * Those who participate in other research studies which require activities that interfere with the measurements of the current study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scale to measure perceptions of training program3 monthsSelf report survey scale to measure perceptions of training using agree-disagree scale that yields a composite score of rating that the training is worth the investment of their time and they would recommend it to others in their community.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scales to measure knowledge gained from training3 monthsSelf report on 10, multiple choice items to measure the knowledge about opioids and other information taught during training content. Scores reflect the amount of learning from training.
Scale to measure perceptions of efficacy in delivering naloxone.3 monthsSelf report scales will measure response efficacy (i.e., administering Naloxone is effective) and self efficacy (i.e., they can administer Naloxone) using agree-disagree scales. Each subscale will consist of at least 3 items and be modified from existing efficacy scales used in drug prevention research.
Scale to measure exposure to recruitment campaign3 monthsWill be adapted from the evaluation of the ONCDP's substance use prevention campaigns to measure if participants recall receiving messages and the channel that they received it in. Response items will include definitely seen, might have seen and definitely not seen

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026