Skip to content

Assessing the Symptomatic Benefit of Acoustic Slow Wave Enhancement in Parkinson Disease

Assessing the Symptomatic Benefit of Acoustic Slow Wave Enhancement in Parkinson Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind and Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04589182
Enrollment
12
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2020-10-20
Completion date
2022-10-31
Last updated
2021-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Huntington Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Parkinson Disease

Keywords

sleep, neurodegeneration, slow- wave sleep

Brief summary

The study is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled cross-over trial to assess the efficacy as well as safety and tolerability of auditory SWS enhancement on measured outcomes in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with disturbed nighttime sleep. Additionally, the investigators will assess the feasibility and efficacy of auditory slow-wave sleep (SWS) enhancement in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Huntington Disease (HD) patients in a pilot study.

Detailed description

The study is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled cross-over trial to assess the efficacy as well as safety and tolerability of auditory SWS enhancement on measured outcomes in PD patients with disturbed nighttime sleep. Patients will be randomized to 2 groups: Group 1 will first be treated with auditory stimulation for 3 nights and then - after a wash-out period of 4 nights - switched to 3 nights of sham stimulation. Group 2 will first receive sham-stimulation for 3 nights and then switch to 3 nights of auditory stimulation treatment. The wash-out period in between will be 4 nights. Patients and investigators assessing the outcomes will be blinded to the conditions. All interventions will take place at the patients' homes. The pilot study is aimed at assessment of safety, tolerability, feasibility and efficacy of auditory SWS enhancement on measured outcomes in MCI and HD patients with disturbed nighttime sleep. Patients will be treated with verum or sham auditory stimulation for 2 consecutive nights. All interventions will take place at the patients' homes.

Interventions

DEVICEMHSL- SleepBand

The MHSL-SleepBand (sleep headband) is easy to apply and only involves attachment of sticky electrodes on different locations on the face/behind ear to be able to measure EEG (electroencephalogram), EOG (electrooculogram) and EMG (electromyogram). Brief tones at a low volume (around 60 dB, comparable to conversation) will be applied, when slow waves are present in the course of the sleep period and other criteria are fulfilled. Auditory stimulation will start with a specific volume that has been adjusted to the individual hearing capacity (usually between 45-65 dB; maximum 80 dB). The stimulation is performed in a way that the general structure of sleep (e.g. duration, sleep cycling, etc.) is unchanged.

DEVICESham

Playing no tones during non- Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep but wearing the device and recording the biosignals over a period of 3 nights, every night.

Sponsors

ETH Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
Christian Baumann
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

During data collection, patients will be blinded to the condition. The leading experimenter will be unblind and have access to the keys that define whether the interventions, namely intervention 1 and intervention 2, are sham or verum. However, all experimenters will be blinded for analysis of outcome measures.

Intervention model description

randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled cross-over trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent as documented by signature * Diagnosis of PD along international criteria with mild to moderate disease severity (Hoehn- Yahr (HY) stages ll-lll), * Self-reported sleep problems and subjectively impaired sleep quality (PDSS-2 sleep quality subscale (items 1-3 and 14) ≥7) * Stable home situation (e.g. long-term place to live) that allows for reliable application of intervention for the duration of the study * Ability to apply the intervention for the duration of study, either alone or with help of co-habitant * Sufficient German language comprehension to follow the study procedures and answer all questions related to the study outcomes * Dosing of dopaminergic and other PD treatment must have been stable for at least 14 days prior to the first intervention period * Negative pregnancy test during screening (except in women who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or post-menopausal for longer than 1 year), * Age above 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Known presence of neurologic (other than PD), psychiatric, or sleep disorders (others than associated with PD) * Parkinsonism without response to levodopa; Atypical Parkinsonian syndromes * Severe medical conditions as renal insufficiency, liver failure or congestive heart failure * The regular use of benzodiazepines and other central nervous system (CNS)-depressant substances, as well as melatonin and other sleep inducing substances * Inability to hear the tones produced by the MHSL-SleepBand device * Absence of slow-wave enhancement by auditory stimulation during the screening night * Skin disorders/problems/allergies in face/ear area that could worsen with electrode application * Failure to give informed consent * Known or suspected drug- or medication abuse * Known or suspected non-compliance * Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, cognitive deficits * Cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment - MoCA \<24) * Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study * Previous enrolment in the current study * Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons * Shift work (work during the night) * Travelling more than 2 time zones in the last month before intervention starts or during intervention (start of intervention will be adapted to fit with this criteria) * Substance or alcohol abuse (i.e. \> 0.5 l wine or 1 l beer per day) * High caffeine consumption (\> 5 servings/day; including coffee, energy drink) * Planned medical intervention of substantial relevance, e.g. surgery, during intervention (routine assessments, e.g. check-ups will be allowed) * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding, * Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study, * Lack of safe contraception, defined as: Female patients of childbearing potential, not using and not willing to continue using a medically reliable method of contraception for the entire study duration, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases. Please note that female patients who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or postmenopausal for longer than 1 year are not considered as being of child bearing potential. Pilot studies: Inclusion criteria: * Informed Consent as documented by signature (see Informed Consent Form), * Age above 18 years * The diagnosis of MCI along international criteria or manifest HD (diagnosis of HD confirmed by genetic testing, patients above the age of 18 years, manifest HD, diagnostic confidence of 4) * Stable home situation (e.g. long-term place to live) that allows for reliable application of intervention for the duration of the study, * Stable regimen of therapeutic drugs for at least 2 weeks prior to the intervention, * For HD patients: self-ambulatory * Native German speaker or good understanding of German. Translation assistance will be accepted, if this will allow a nonnative German speaker to comprehensively follow the study protocol including all questionnaires * Ability to apply the intervention for the duration of study, either alone or with help of co-habitant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective sleep qualityassessed before and after each intervention (day 1 and 4, day 7 and 10)Changes in subjective sleep quality measured with adapted version of Parkinson Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS2), questions on a scale of 0-4, with 0 indicating better sleep
Pilot study: feasibility of acoustic SWS enhancementassessed after intervention (day 10)Feasibility of acoustic SWS enhancement in MCI and HD patients (enhancement of slow-waves measured with EEG)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Momentary sleepinessassessed before and after each intervention, and every morning and evening during the intervention (day 1 until 4, day 7 until 10)Changes in momentary sleepiness assessed with Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) on a scale 1-10, with 1 indicating extreme alertness and 10 indicating extreme sleepiness
Average sleepinessassessed every evening during the intervention (day 1 until 4, day 7 until 10)Average sleepiness throughout the day measured with VAS on a scale 0-100, with 100 indicating extreme sleepiness
Moodassessed every evening during the intervention (day 1 until 4, day 7 until 10)Changes in mood assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale 0-100, with 100 indicating extremely good mood
Restorative effect of sleepassessed every morning during the intervention (day 1 until 4, day 7 until 10)Changes in restorative effect of sleep using VAS, on a scale 0-100, with 100 indicating very refreshing sleep
Vigilanceassessed before and after each intervention (day 1 and 4, day 7 and 10)Changes in vigilance measured using Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT)
Auditory stimulation algorithm performanceassessed every night of the intervention (day 1 until 4, day 7 until 10)Performance of algorithm detecting and stimulating slow waves, measured with EEG
Pilot study: changes in moodbefore and after intervention (day 1 and 4, day 7 and 10)changes in mood assessed on VAS (Visual Analog Scale) on a scale 0-100, with 100 indicating extremely good mood
Pilot study: changes in sleep qualitybefore and after intervention (day 1 and 4, day 7 and 10)changes in sleep quality assessed on VAS (Visual Analog Scale) on a scale 0-100, with 100 indicating extremely good sleep quality
Pilot study: changes in sleepinessbefore and after intervention (day 1 and 4, day 7 and 10)changes in sleepiness assessed on VAS (Visual Analog Scale) on a scale 0-100, with 100 indicating extreme sleepiness
Slow wave enhancementassessed every night of the intervention (day 1 until 4, day 7 until 10)Enhancement of slow waves with auditory stimulation, measured with EEG
Sleep benefit on motor performanceassessed before and after each intervention (day 1 and 4, day 7 and 10)Changes in motor performance assessed with focus motor assessment

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactSimon Schreiner, MD
simon.schreiner@usz.ch+41 44 355 55 11
Backup ContactAngelina Maric, PhD
Angelina.maric@usz.ch+41 44 255 86 15

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026