Skip to content

Clinical Investigation Evaluating a New Autotransfusion Device in Cardiac Surgery

Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefit of a New Autotransfusion Device in Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04588350
Acronym
i-TRANSEP
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2020-09-28
Completion date
2021-09-20
Last updated
2021-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Loss, Hemorrhage, Surgical Blood Loss

Keywords

Autotransfusion, Cell salvage, Patient blood management

Brief summary

Blood transfusion is at the heart of the therapeutic arsenal when there is a hemorrhage and/or blood loss during a surgery. There are two types of transfusion: the homologous one (blood from a compatible donor) and the autologous or autotransfusion method (which is done with the patient's own blood). Although homologous transfusions can save lives, it can cause significant adverse events. Since then, multiple solutions have been developed to avoid exposing patients to these risks. It is in this context that was born the Patient Blood Management (PBM). Thus, the strategy in this PBM has been defined as the appropriate use of blood and blood components, with the aim of minimizing the use of allogeneic transfusions. In this context, particular interest has been given to autologous transfusion or autotransfusion or cell salvage, the general purpose is to reduce (or even stop) the use of allogeneic products and to reduce the risks associated with the ABO compatibility system, as well as all the adverse effects associated with allogeneic plasma and platelet transfusions. Most autotransfusers available on the market operate by centrifugation. Autotransfusion is already a solution in Patient Blood Management and its efficiency and safety have already been optimized. However, there is still a need to improve the quality of the treated blood with an easier-to-use device that could improve the quality of the blood concentrate. Indeed, with the current devices, it may happen that the use of allogeneic transfusions, plasma and platelets transfusions, is necessary in addition to autologous red blood cells thus reducing the interest of autotransfusion. It is in this context that i-SEP has developed a new autotransfusion device based on a filtration method. Unlike competing devices, the i-SEP device allows the concentration of not only red blood cells (as competitive devices) but also platelets. In this study, the i-SEP device is used in typical clinical applications of autotransfusion: cardiovascular and orthopedic surgeries, where there is a risk of hemorrhage and/or blood loss for example ≥ 500mL in cardiac surgery and ≥ 300mL in orthopedic surgery. The study includes a screening phase (≤ 21Days), surgery phase when the i-SEP device is used (Day 0), a post-surgery phase (Day 1 - Day 6), a first follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 3) and a second follow-up visit (Day 30 ± 7).

Detailed description

Blood transfusion is at the heart of the therapeutic arsenal when one wishes to preserve the hemodynamic balance of a patient. There are two types of transfusion: the homologous one (blood from a compatible donor) and the autologous or autotransfusion method (which is done with one's own blood / by the patient's own blood). Although homologous transfusions can save lives, it may lead to non-negligible adverse events. Among these events, immunological consequences such as allo-immunization against red blood cells' antigens from the donor blood can be cited. Some infections have also been reported following allogenic transfusions. Since then, multiple solutions have been developed to avoid exposing patients to these risks. It is in this context that was born the Patient Blood Management (PBM). Thus, the strategy in this PBM has been defined as the appropriate use of blood and blood components, with the aim of minimizing the use of allogeneic transfusions. In this context, particular interest has been given to autologous transfusion or autotransfusion or cell salvage. The principle of Intra-Operative Cell Salvaged (IOCS) allows intravenous administration of the patient's own blood collected at the surgical site or postoperative wound during hemorrhagic surgery. It is used mainly in cardiac, vascular, transplant and elective orthopedic surgeries and tends to spread to other surgeries such as neurosurgery, obstetrics and urology.The IOCS has multiple benefits, primarily autologous (the patient gets his own blood), immediate availability in the operating room, reduced costs of patient care, and the recycling of otherwise lost blood products. It is part of blood saving techniques that avoid the use of homologous blood. Indeed, the general purpose of IOCS is to reduce (or even stop) the use of allogeneic products and to reduce the risks associated with the ABO compatibility system, as well as all the adverse effects associated with allogeneic plasma and platelet transfusions Most autotransfusers available on the market operate by centrifugation. Autotransfusion is already a solution in Patient Blood Management and its efficiency and safety have already been optimized. However, there is still a need to improve the quality of the treated blood with an easier-to-use device that could improve the quality of the blood concentrate. Indeed, with the current devices, it may happen that the use of allogeneic transfusions, plasma and platelets transfusions, is necessary in addition to autologous red blood cells thus reducing the interest of autotransfusion. It is in this context that i-SEP has developed a new autotransfusion device based on a filtration method. Unlike competing devices, the i-SEP device allows the concentration of not only red blood cells (as competitive devices) but also platelets. In this study, the i-SEP device is used in typical clinical applications of autotransfusion: cardiovascular and orthopedic surgeries, where there is a risk of hemorrhage and/or blood loss for example ≥ 500mL in cardiac surgery and ≥ 300mL in orthopedic surgery. The study includes a screening phase (≤ 21Days), surgery phase when the i-SEP device is used (Day 0), a post-surgery phase (Day 1 - Day 6), a first follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 3) and a second follow-up visit (Day 30 ± 7).

Interventions

DEVICEi-SEP autotransfusion system

Intraoperative recovery and washing of the processed blood by i-SEP autotransfusion system in surgeries where a bleeding is expected

Sponsors

i-SEP
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single arm study in cardiac surgery

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Preoperative Inclusion Criteria: * Is the patient able and willing to give informed consent before participating in the study? * Is the patient aged ≥ 18 years? * Does the patient have a social protection system? * Does the patient weigh ≥ 59kg (for the sole purpose of blood assessment related to the clinical study)? * Is the patient indicated for a cardiac surgery with the implementation of a Cardio Pulmonary Bypass (CPB)? * Does the patient have a preoperative hemoglobin ≥ 13g / L for a man and ≥ 12g / L for a woman? * Does the patient have a preoperative platelets count ≥ 150000 / μL? Intraoperative Inclusion Criteria: \- Does the patient have anticoagulated blood losses ≥ 500mL (without considering priming volume in the first cycle)?

Exclusion criteria

Preoperative

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance of the device in terms of exceeding red blood cell recovery and hematocrit / hemoglobin thresholdsDay 0Proportion of patients with mean Red Blood Cells (RBCs) recovery ≥ 80% and with mean output Hematocrit ≥ 40% or hemoglobin concentration ≥ 13.3g/dL. Mean recovery is calculated with quantification in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and quantification in the concentrated blood, mean output is calculated on the concentrated blood.
Safety of the device in terms of elimination of contaminants such as heparin and hemolysis markers (free hemoglobin)Day 0Proportion of patients with heparin washout ≥ 90% and with free hemoglobin washout ≥ 75% on the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of homologous transfusionUp to 1 month follow-upProportion of patients with homologous transfusion (number of units and type of blood product infused) during operative and post-operative period
Incidence of re-intervention for bleedingUp to 1 month follow-upProportion of patients with re-intervention for bleeding during post-operative period
Contaminants concentration such as heparin and hemolysis markers (free hemoglobin) in the concentrated bloodDay 0Concentration of heparin and free hemoglobin in the treated (concentrated) blood from the i-SEP device
Evolution of the patient's complete blood countUp to Day 2Evolution of the patient complete blood count after surgery as compared to before surgery
Blood loss in drainage after surgeryUp to Day 2 and/or to drainage removalQuantity and evolution of the patient blood loss in drainage after surgery
White Blood Cells yieldDay 0Quantification of White Blood Cells in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Hematocrit yieldDay 0Quantification of hematocrit in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Total protein yieldDay 0Quantification of total protein in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Albumin yieldDay 0Quantification of albumin in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Potassium yieldDay 0Quantification of potassium in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Fat yield through triglyceride assayDay 0Quantification of fat through triglyceride measurements in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Performance of the device in terms of platelets recoveryDay 0Platelet yield and their functionality through platelet activation and degranulation measured in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
High levels of red blood cell recovery and hematocrit / hemoglobin thresholdsDay 0Proportion of patients with mean output Hematocrit ≥ 45% or hemoglobin concentration ≥ 15.5g/dL in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Hemoglobin yieldDay 0Quantification of hemoglobin in the pre-treatment blood (after pre-filtration through the blood collection reservoir) and in the concentrated blood from the i-SEP device
Incidence of adverse eventsUp to 1 month follow-upProportion of patients with adverse events (especially Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Device Effects)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
User satisfaction questionnaireThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearEach user fills in a questionnaire to give its feeling about the ergonomics and intuitivity of the i-Sep device

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026