Skip to content

Temporal and Kinematic Analysis of Timed Up and Go Test in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Temporal and Kinematic Analysis of Timed Up and Go Test in Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04588155
Enrollment
44
Registered
2020-10-19
Start date
2019-12-09
Completion date
2020-01-30
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low-back Pain

Keywords

Chronic Low-back Pain, Functional assessment, Time Up and Go Test, Inertial measurement unit

Brief summary

Kinematic and temporal analysis of the movement helps researchers and clinicians to better understand the way humans move and interact within the environment in which they live, better describe the alterations coming from impairments, and finally allow to better tailor interventions for patients. In this perspective, motion analysis has become, in the last 30 years, a remarkable and important field of research. Even if movement assessment should be a cornerstone for definition and modulation of rehabilitation interventions, there are still few motion analysis devices that are able to influence the clinical decision process; motion analysis labs are among those, but their use is unfortunately limited due to the costs of instruments and analysis. Other small unobtrusive wearable devices, easier to use and cost-effective, have been developed, like Inertial measurement units (IMU), composed by accelerometers and gyroscopes. They could therefore represent an incentive for a more widespread use of motion analysis within daily clinical activity in Rehabilitaion. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is a simple, widely used, functional test which involves standing up from a chair, walking three meters, turning, and going back to sit. It is used to evaluate movement, mobility, dynamic and static balance in people with musculoskeletal impairment, neurological diseases, aging related conditions, and the quality of life in people with low back pain. The only and easy outcome considered is the time to completion. Nevertheless, the application of an IMU to a subject performing TUG can provide other objective, quantitative data, like temporal and kinematic parameters of the whole test and its sub-phases. The instrumented TUG (iTUG) has already been applied, mainly in the neurorehabilitation field, in particular for Parkinson's disease and for post-stroke impairments. cLBP is one of the most burdensome health problem worldwide. cLBP has been considered a bio-psycho-social disease, characterized by pain in the lumbar region, functional impairments, and condition-related disability. Despite the obvious motor problems affecting people with cLBP, to the best of our knowledge, chronic low back pain (cLBP) has not yet been explored using iTUG. The aim of study is to analyse temporal and kinematic parameters of cLBP subjects compared to BMI and age-matched healthy subjects, through iTUG and to explore the correlations of those parameters with pain and disability.

Interventions

Timed Up and Go Test administration with application of Inertial Measurement Unit for a temporal and kinematic assessment of movement performed during test esecution

OTHERClinical assessment

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) to assess the level of functional impairment and disability in the activity of daily living Numerical Pain Rating System (NPRS) administration to quantify level of pain experienced just before the TUG test execution

Sponsors

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(for Chronic Low Back Pain population): * Pain from at least 3 months * Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) ≥ 4

Exclusion criteria

(for Chronic Low Back Pain population): * History of neurological impairment or disease, * Other orthopaedic impairment within the past 6 months or surgery in the previous 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Temporal parameters of movementthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthTemporal analysis of TUG performance
Kinematic parameters of movementthrough study completion, an average of 2 monthKinematic analysis of TUG performance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Roland Morris Disability Questionnairethrough study completion, an average of 2 monthQuestionnaire that assess levels of impairment and disability coming from low back pain The score can range from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability).
Numerical Pain Rating Scalethrough study completion, an average of 2 monthScale for pain assessment: the minimum value 0 and maximum values 10, where higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026