Anesthesia, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Radical Prostatectomy, Patient Satisfaction, Postoperative Period, Quality of Life, Analgesia, Epidural, Quality of Recovery
Conditions
Keywords
General anesthesia, Combined light general and epidural Anesthesia, Health related quality of life, Radical prostatectomy
Brief summary
Postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) could be related to anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This study is exploring early QoR after radical prostatectomy in the two groups of anesthesia. The first group had a light general anesthesia with lumbal epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. The second group had general anesthesia and a continuous postoperative analgesia with tramadol. The postoperative QoR was evaluated 24 hours after surgery.
Detailed description
All participants were premedicated with diazepam 5 mg 12 hours and 1 hour before surgery. Thromboprophylaxis ( 4,000 - 6000 IU) depending on the body weight was given at least 12 hours before surgery. All participants were warmed to prevent unintended hypothermia. Participants were allocated by permuted block randomisation into one of two groups: general anesthesia group and epidural anesthesia. The randomisation list was obtained from R program version 3.5.3. The group allocations were contained in a closed envelope that were opened before surgery after the completed enrollment procedure. All patients and infusions were wormed to prevent unintended hypothermia. Induction of general anesthesia was with midazolam 2.5 mg, fentanyl 100 μg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg and vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Balanced crystalloid fluids were used to treat hypovolemia. Additionally, 6% Hydroxyethyl starch was used before blood transfusion products to treat profound hypovolemia. Blood transfusions were given according to blood loss and clinical situation. Bradycardia was treated with atropine. Hypotension was treated with ephedrine boluses. Anti-inflammatory drug metamizole (dipyrone) 2.5 g was given intravenously before the end of the surgery and after 12 hours after the surgery. Neostigmine 2.5 mg with atropine 1 mg was used for the reversal of the effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents after surgery. Participants were placed for one day in a urology high care unit provided with constant and vigilant nurse care. Crystalloid infusions were used for maintaining diuresis. Gastroprotection was done with pantoprazole 40 mg. Metoclopramid 10 mg was given for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The postoperative QoR was evaluated with three QoR scales. Scales for pain, anxiety and PONV were also examined. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire evaluated quality of life one month before and one month after surgery.
Interventions
Epidural anaesthesia: mixture of ropivacaine 6.5 mg/ ml and fentanyl 8.3 μg/ml. Light general anesthesia: isoflurane in mixture of 50/50 of nitrous oxide and oxygen to achieve Minimum alveolar concentration between 0.6 and 0.8.
Before the end of operation was given 4 ml of the mixture of ropivacaine 4.4 mg/ml and morphine 0.8mg/ ml. Epidural analgesia was continued for next 24 hours with a mixture of ropivacaine 2.2 mg/ml and morphine 0.4 mg/ml.
PROCEDUREGeneral anesthesia
Maintaining general anesthesia: nitrous oxide and oxygen in mixture 50/50 and isoflurane to achieve minimum alveolar concentration between 0.8 and 1. Fentanyl loading dose: 6-8 μg/kg. Additional fentanyl doses were given incrementally.
Tramadol 100 mg in the first hour followed by tramadol 300 mg continuously for the next 24 hours.
Sponsors
University Hospital of Split
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Elective radical Prostatectomy. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: I, II, III
Exclusion criteria
Dementia * Delirium * Acute psychosis * Emergent surgery * Hospitalisation in Intensive care unit * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system: IV * Reoperations * Muscular diseases * Montreal cognitive test \<24 points * Contraindications for epidural anesthesia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analog scale of quality of recovery (QoR) | 24 hours after surgery | Patient rated visual analog scale is a simple scale for rating the quality of recovery by placing X on the line. The scale is 100 millimetres long. Poor recovery is on the left side of the line. Under the end of the left line is an explanation of poor recovery: in severe pain,nausea & vomiting, confused, immobilized, unable to eat and unable to communicate. Excellent recovery is on the right side of the line. Under the end of the line is a written explanation: without any pain, comfortable, alert, active, enjoying food and communicating freely. |
| Quality of recovery 40 (QoR-40) | 24 hours after surgery | The QoR-40 measures five related dimensions of quality of recovery: emotional state (8 items), physical comfort (12 items), physical independence (5 items), psychological support (7 items) and pain (7 items). Each item is rated on a 5 point Likert scale. Minimal possible score is 40 and maximal possible score is 200. |
| Quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) | 24 hours after surgery | Quality of recovery (QoR-15) is a short version of QoR - 40 questionnaire. The QoR-15 questionnaire has 15 items scaled from 0 to 10. Minimum score is 0, and maximum 150. It is shorter, user friendly and less time consuming then extensive QoR-40 questionnaire. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analog scale of anxiety | 24 hours after surgery | Patient rated visual analog scale is a simple scale for rating the level of anxiety by placing X on the line. The scale is 100 millimetres long. No anxiety at all is written on the left side of the line. No anxiety at all will correspond to 0 millimetres. The worst possible anxiety is on the right side of the line.The worst possible pain will correspond to 100 millimetres. |
| Numerical anxiety scale | 24 hours after surgery | Similar to the visual analog scale of anxiety, but instead of line, it consists of a sequence of numbers (0-10). For some participants, scaling in numbers (0-10) is more clear than analog scale. No anxiety at all will correspond to 0 and the worst possible anxiety will correspond to 10. |
| Visual anxiety scale with faces | 24 hours after surgery | Similar to the numerical anxiety scale. For some patients quantifying pain in numbers is vague, but if they can observe faces with different emotional expressions ranging from a happy smiling to a crying face with tears. Under the faces are written corresponding numbers (0,2,4,6,8,10). No anxiety at all will correspond to 0 and the worst possible anxiety will correspond to 10. |
| Visual analog scale of pain- at rest and during coughing and straining | 24 hours after surgery | Patient rated visual analog pain scale is a simple scale for rating the pain intensity by placing X on the line. The scale is 100 millimetres long. No pain at all is written on the left side of the line and will correspond to 0 millimetres. The worst possible pain is on the right side of the line. The worst possible pain will correspond to 100 millimetres. It is important to asses pain intensity at rest and pain intensity during activity (coughing, straining or getting up from bed ). |
| Simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) impact scale | 24 hours after surgery | PONV impact scale consists of 2 questions that are scored from 0 to 3. Five points or six defines clinically important PONV. |
| Global visual analog and numeric scale of nausea intensity | 24 hours after surgery | Scale for rating the nausea intensity by placing X on the line. No nausea at all is written on the left side of the line. The worst possible nausea experienced is on the right side of the line. Under the line are written numbers (0-10). No nausea at all will correspond to 0 and the worst possible nausea will correspond to 10. |
| The short form health survey version one (SF-36:I) | 24 hours after surgery and one month after surgery] | The short form health survey version one (SF-36:I.) measure eight dimensions of quality of life: physical functioning (10 items), role limitation due to physical problems (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), social functioning (2 items), mental health (5 items), role limitation due to emotional problems (3 items), vitality (4 items) and general health perception (5 items). Each dimension has a possible score of 0 (poor health) to 100 (excellent health). |
| Numerical pain scale - at rest and during coughing and straining | 24 hours after surgery | Similar to the visual analog scale of pain, but instead of line, it consists of a sequence of numbers (0-10). For some participants, scaling pain in numbers (0-10) is more clear than analog scale. No pain will at all will correspond to 0 and the worst possible pain will correspond to 10. It is important to asses pain intensity at rest and pain intensity during activity (coughing, straining or getting up from bed ). |
| Visual pain scale with faces- at rest and during coughing and straining | 24 hours after surgery | Similar to the numeric pain scale. If pain scaling in numbers is vaguely, then six faces with emotional expression ranging from a happy smiling to a crying face with tears explain numbers under the faces (0,2,4,6,8,10). It was designated for children. No pain will at all will correspond to 0 and the worst possible pain will correspond to 10. It is important to asses pain intensity at rest and pain intensity during activity (coughing, straining or getting up from bed ). |
Countries
Croatia
Outcome results
None listed