Skip to content

Tralokinumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Japanese Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tralokinumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Japanese Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Are Candidates for Systemic Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04587453
Acronym
ECZTRA 8
Enrollment
106
Registered
2020-10-14
Start date
2020-10-27
Completion date
2021-07-15
Last updated
2025-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

Primary objective: To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) compared with placebo in combination with TCS in treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Secondary objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in combination with TCS on severity and extent of AD, itch, health-related quality of life, and health care resource utilisation compared with placebo in combination with TCS. To assess the safety of tralokinumab in combination with TCS when used to treat moderate-to-severe AD for 16 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGTralokinumab

Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the immunoglobulin G4 subclass that specifically binds to human interleukin-13 (IL-13) and blocks the interaction with IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous administration.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo contains the same excipients in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab.

TCS administered as needed.

Sponsors

LEO Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Neither the trial participant nor any of the investigator or LEO pharma staff who are involved in the treatment or clinical evaluation and monitoring of the participants will be aware of the treatment received. The packaging and labelling of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) will contain no evidence of their identity. Since tralokinumab and placebo are visually distinct and not matched for viscosity, IMP will be handled and administered by a qualified, unblinded healthcare professional at the site who will not be involved in the management of trial participants and who will not perform any of the assessments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key inclusion criteria: * Japanese subject aged 18 years and above. * Diagnosis of AD as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka (1980) criteria for AD. * History of AD for 1 year or more. * A recent history (within 1 year before screening) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medication. * AD involvement of 10% or more body surface area at screening and at baseline according to component A of SCORAD. * Applied a stable dose of emollient twice daily (or more, as needed) for at least 14 days before randomisation. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects for whom TCS are medically inadvisable e.g. due to important side effects or safety risks in the opinion of the investigator. * Active dermatologic conditions that may confound the diagnosis of AD or would interfere with assessment of treatment. * Use of tanning beds or phototherapy within 6 weeks prior to randomisation. * Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs and/or systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to randomisation. * Treatment with TCS, topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, or topical Janus kinase inhibitors within 2 weeks prior to randomisation. * Receipt of any marketed biological therapy (i.e. immunoglobulin, anti-immunoglobulin E) including dupilumab or investigational biologic agents 3 to 6 months prior to randomisation. * Active skin infections within 1 week prior to randomisation. * Clinically significant infection within 4 weeks prior to randomisation. * A helminth parasitic infection within 6 months prior to the date informed consent is obtained. * Tuberculosis requiring treatment within the 12 months prior to screening. * Known primary immunodeficiency disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16Week 16IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the participant's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at Week 16Week 0 to Week 16Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16Participants assessed the itch for the past 24 hours using the Worst Daily Pruritus NRS, consisting of 11 points, with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.
At Least 90% Reduction in EASI (EASI90) at Week 16Week 0 to Week 16EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
At Least 50% Reduction in EASI (EASI50) at Week 16Week 0 to Week 16EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
Percentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.
Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score From Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the AD disease based on 3 components: * A) The extent of AD lesions. Assessed as percentage of each defined body area and reported as sum of all areas (max score = 100%). * B) The severity of AD lesions. The intensity of 6 specific symptoms on a representative area was assessed using the scale: 0 = none/absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe (max score = 18). * C) Subjective symptoms. The itch and sleeplessness over the last 3 days/nights was recorded for each symptom by the subject on a VAS scale: 0 = no itch or trouble sleeping, 10 = unbearable itch or a lot of trouble sleeping (max score = 20). The SCORAD was calculated as: A/5+7B/2+C. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.
Change in Eczema-related Sleep NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16Participants rated how much their eczema interfered with their sleep the last night using an 11-point NRS (0 indicating that it 'did not interfere' and 10 indicating that it 'completely interfered').
Change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score Form Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16POEM consists of 7 items, each addressing a specific symptom (itching, sleep, bleeding, weeping, cracking, flaking, and dryness). Participants score how often they have experienced each symptom over the previous week, using a 5-point categorical response scale (0=no days; 1=1 to 2 days; 2=3 to 4 days; 3=5 to 6 days; 4=every day). The total score is the sum of the 7 items (ranging from 0 to 28) and reflects disease-related morbidity; higher scores indicate more severe disease.
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events From Baseline to Week 16 Per SubjectWeek 0 to Week 16Number of events divided by patient years of exposure (= rate).
Number of Subjects With Presence of Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16Anti-tralokinumab antibody levels were analyzed using a validated bioanalytical method. Positive treatment-emergent ADA was defined as ADA negative or missing at baseline, and at least one positive post-baseline ADA response. Negative treatment-emergent ADA was defined as ADA negative or missing at baseline, and all post-baseline ADA assessments negative.
Change in Worst Daily Pruritus NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16Week 0 to Week 16Participants assessed the itch for the past 24 hours using the Worst Daily Pruritus NRS, consisting of 11 points, with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to Week 16.Week 0 to Week 16DLQI consists of 10 items addressing the participant's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the past week, such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0=not at all ⁄ not relevant; 1=a little; 2=a lot; 3=very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (ranging from 0 to 30), with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First subject first visit: 27-Oct-2020. Subjects were recruited at 25 sites in Japan.

Pre-assignment details

126 subjects were screened. 20 subjects were screening failures. 106 subjects were included in the trial and randomised 1:1 to tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS. All randomised subjects received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tralokinumab+TCS
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants were treated with 300 mg tralokinumab every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
53
Placebo+TCS
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 16): Participants received placebo every 2 weeks until Week 14, after a loading dose of placebo at Week 0. TCS was applied on the skin as needed.
53
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Treatment Period (Week 0 to Week 16)Premature (before Week 16) discontinuation of IMP01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTralokinumab+TCSTotalPlacebo+TCS
Age at onset of atopic dermatitis3.0 years4.0 years5.0 years
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
52 Participants105 Participants53 Participants
Age, Continuous39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Body surface area (BSA) with atopic dermatitis66.6 percentage of BSA affected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7
65.5 percentage of BSA affected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
64.4 percentage of BSA affected
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)13.09 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.92
13.70 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.65
14.30 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.39
Duration of atopic dermatitis32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
30.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score37.12 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.71
34.71 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25
32.30 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
53 Participants106 Participants53 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Almost clear
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Clear
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Mild
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Moderate
23 Participants46 Participants23 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Severe
30 Participants60 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
53 Participants106 Participants53 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
53 Participants106 Participants53 Participants
Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD)71.72 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79
70.77 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.08
69.82 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.39
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants39 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants67 Participants31 Participants
Worst Daily Pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS)7.60 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65
7.71 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51
7.81 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 530 / 530 / 80 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 5319 / 532 / 81 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 530 / 80 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at Week 16

Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tralokinumab+TCSAt Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at Week 1638 Participants
Placebo+TCSAt Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at Week 1630 Participants
Comparison: Subjects with 75% reduction in EASI were considered responders. Subjects with missing data or subjects who had received rescue medication prior to Week 16 were considered non-responders in the primary analysis of the primary estimand.95% CI: [-2.9, 33]
Primary

Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16

IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the participant's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tralokinumab+TCSInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 1617 Participants
Placebo+TCSInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 1614 Participants
Comparison: Responders were considered those meeting an IGA score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear). Subjects with missing data or subjects who had received rescue medication prior to Week 16 were considered non-responders in the primary analysis of the primary estimand.95% CI: [-11.2, 22.5]
Secondary

At Least 50% Reduction in EASI (EASI50) at Week 16

EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tralokinumab+TCSAt Least 50% Reduction in EASI (EASI50) at Week 1645 Participants
Placebo+TCSAt Least 50% Reduction in EASI (EASI50) at Week 1642 Participants
Comparison: Subjects with at least 50% reduction in EASI were considered responders. Subjects who had received rescue medication were considered non-responders. Subjects with missing data were imputed as non-responders.95% CI: [-9, 20.3]
Secondary

At Least 90% Reduction in EASI (EASI90) at Week 16

EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tralokinumab+TCSAt Least 90% Reduction in EASI (EASI90) at Week 1624 Participants
Placebo+TCSAt Least 90% Reduction in EASI (EASI90) at Week 1616 Participants
Comparison: Subjects with a reduction of 90% in EASI were considered responders. Subjects who had received rescue medication were considered non-responders. Subjects with missing data were imputed as non-responders.95% CI: [-3, 33.2]
Secondary

Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to Week 16.

DLQI consists of 10 items addressing the participant's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life over the past week, such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0=not at all ⁄ not relevant; 1=a little; 2=a lot; 3=very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (ranging from 0 to 30), with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tralokinumab+TCSChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to Week 16.-10.0 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Placebo+TCSChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline to Week 16.-8.8 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
95% CI: [-2.7, 0.5]
Secondary

Change in Eczema-related Sleep NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16

Participants rated how much their eczema interfered with their sleep the last night using an 11-point NRS (0 indicating that it 'did not interfere' and 10 indicating that it 'completely interfered').

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tralokinumab+TCSChange in Eczema-related Sleep NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16-4.2 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Placebo+TCSChange in Eczema-related Sleep NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16-4.1 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
95% CI: [-0.9, 0.6]
Secondary

Change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score Form Baseline to Week 16

POEM consists of 7 items, each addressing a specific symptom (itching, sleep, bleeding, weeping, cracking, flaking, and dryness). Participants score how often they have experienced each symptom over the previous week, using a 5-point categorical response scale (0=no days; 1=1 to 2 days; 2=3 to 4 days; 3=5 to 6 days; 4=every day). The total score is the sum of the 7 items (ranging from 0 to 28) and reflects disease-related morbidity; higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tralokinumab+TCSChange in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score Form Baseline to Week 16-14.4 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Placebo+TCSChange in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score Form Baseline to Week 16-11.2 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.83
95% CI: [-5.6, -0.9]
Secondary

Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score From Baseline to Week 16

SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the AD disease based on 3 components: * A) The extent of AD lesions. Assessed as percentage of each defined body area and reported as sum of all areas (max score = 100%). * B) The severity of AD lesions. The intensity of 6 specific symptoms on a representative area was assessed using the scale: 0 = none/absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe (max score = 18). * C) Subjective symptoms. The itch and sleeplessness over the last 3 days/nights was recorded for each symptom by the subject on a VAS scale: 0 = no itch or trouble sleeping, 10 = unbearable itch or a lot of trouble sleeping (max score = 20). The SCORAD was calculated as: A/5+7B/2+C. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tralokinumab+TCSChange in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score From Baseline to Week 16-44.1 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 2.61
Placebo+TCSChange in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score From Baseline to Week 16-39.0 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 2.61
95% CI: [-12.4, 2.3]
Secondary

Change in Worst Daily Pruritus NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16

Participants assessed the itch for the past 24 hours using the Worst Daily Pruritus NRS, consisting of 11 points, with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set:106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tralokinumab+TCSChange in Worst Daily Pruritus NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16-4.6 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Placebo+TCSChange in Worst Daily Pruritus NRS Score (Weekly Average) From Baseline to Week 16-4.6 change in score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
95% CI: [-0.7, 0.8]
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Presence of Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Baseline to Week 16

Anti-tralokinumab antibody levels were analyzed using a validated bioanalytical method. Positive treatment-emergent ADA was defined as ADA negative or missing at baseline, and at least one positive post-baseline ADA response. Negative treatment-emergent ADA was defined as ADA negative or missing at baseline, and all post-baseline ADA assessments negative.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Safety analysis set. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tralokinumab+TCSNumber of Subjects With Presence of Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Baseline to Week 160 participants with treatment-emergent ADA
Placebo+TCSNumber of Subjects With Presence of Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Baseline to Week 160 participants with treatment-emergent ADA
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events From Baseline to Week 16 Per Subject

Number of events divided by patient years of exposure (= rate).

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Safety analysis set: 106 subjects. Included all subjects exposed to IMP at least 1 time.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tralokinumab+TCSNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events From Baseline to Week 16 Per Subject605.9 events per patient year of exposure
Placebo+TCSNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events From Baseline to Week 16 Per Subject332.8 events per patient year of exposure
Secondary

Percentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16

EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where higher values indicate a more severe or more extensive condition.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tralokinumab+TCSPercentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16-77.8 percentage change in score on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Placebo+TCSPercentage Change in EASI Score From Baseline to Week 16-73.5 percentage change in score on a scaleStandard Error 3.76
95% CI: [-14.9, 6.3]
Secondary

Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Baseline to Week 16

Participants assessed the itch for the past 24 hours using the Worst Daily Pruritus NRS, consisting of 11 points, with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set: 106 subjects, all randomised and treated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tralokinumab+TCSReduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Baseline to Week 1634 Participants
Placebo+TCSReduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Baseline to Week 1636 Participants
Comparison: Subjects with at least a reduction of 4 in the worst daily pruritus NRS score were considered responders. Subjects who had received rescue medication were considered non-responders. Subjects with missing data at Week 16 were imputed as non-responders.95% CI: [-21.7, 14.2]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026