Skip to content

Follow-up Study of the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Therapy in Patients With Stroke

Follow-up Study of the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Therapy in Patients With Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04587349
Enrollment
2
Registered
2020-10-14
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2020-09-01
Last updated
2020-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

balance, movement, exergaming, posture, quality of life, gait

Brief summary

High intensity motion improves motor functions and quality of life in a neurologist. The investigators want to improve the clinical condition and quality of life of post-STROKE participants with a special sensory motor and visual motor agility therapy. High intensity motion improves engine function and quality of life in a neurologist. With special sensory motor and visual motility, investigaters want to improve the clinical condition and quality of life of STROKE participants. The investigaters randomly select participants who only perform the rehabilitation treatment have performed. The other group that will receive the study's control group will receive the traditional rehabilitation physiotherapy treatment. The investigaters assess the condition and quality of life of the patients. (EQ5-D, Barthel index, MRS test) The ivestigaters examine the functional movement and equilibrium variables of patients. (6MWT, Berg balance test, postgraduation) After that, participants are undergoing a 4-week intensive rehabilitation treatment. All participants are in post stroke. Primary Hypothesis will be changes in life-quality tests (EQ5-D, Barthel index, MRS test). Functional tests show progress 6MWT, Berg balance test and postural control testing with posturography. The results are compared and evaluated among the groups. The expected hypothesis is that visual and acoustic stimulation produces a better physical state at higher intensity. Patients were followed for 2 years and participated in a follow-up study every six months.

Interventions

OTHERNeurorehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation - 2 years-long intervention, targeted postural instability and mobility using at-limit intensity sensori and visuomotor agility training. (2/ week)

OTHERPhysiotherapy

Physiotherapy 2-years-long (3/week)

Sponsors

Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• post stroke

Exclusion criteria

* Sever heart problem * sever demeanor * alcoholism * drug problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
gait / functional test2 years, m (higher point is better)6 minute walk test (m)
balance test2 years, (41-56 = low fall risk, 21-40 = medium fall risk, 0 -20 = high fall risk )Berg Balance Test
postrural control test2 years, mm (2 year-long, the smaller the mm the better the result)posturography
Quality of life measured by EQ5-D scale2 years, 0-5 scale (2 year-long, higher point is better)questionnaire

Countries

Hungary

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026