Skip to content

A Two-Week Crossover Dispensing Evaluation Of Orion Daily Wear Soft Contact Lens

A Two-Week Crossover Dispensing Evaluation Of Orion Daily Wear Soft Contact Lens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04585646
Enrollment
64
Registered
2020-10-14
Start date
2020-09-14
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical performance of test lens (Orion) in comparison with control lens (Gemini) over a period of two weeks of wear.

Detailed description

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical performance of test lens (Orion) in comparison with control lens (Gemini) over a period of two weeks of wear. This is a double-masked, randomized, bilateral, two-week crossover, dispensing study.

Interventions

DEVICEOrion daily disposable contact lens

Subjects will be randomized to wear Orion lens for 2 weeks.

DEVICEGemini daily disposable contact lens

Subjects will be randomized to wear Gemini lens for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer. * Is no greater than 55 years of age. * Has read and understood the information consent letter. * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule. * Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer having worn lenses for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the study. * Has spectacle cylinder ≤1.00D in both eyes. * Has spherical contact lens power requirement between -1.00D and -6.00D in both eyes. * Has manifest refraction visual acuities (VA) equal to or better than logMAR equivalent of 20/20 in each eye. * Wears CLs in both eyes (monovision acceptable, but not monofit) * Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease. * Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination. * Is willing to wear the study contact lenses for a minimum 8 hours per day/6 days per week

Exclusion criteria

* Has never worn contact lenses before. * Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health. * Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health. * Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses. * Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye. * Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars. * Is aphakic. * Has strabismus/amblyopia. * Has undergone corneal refractive surgery. * Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy. * Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Response for Vision SatisfactionBaseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispenseSubjective Response for Vision Satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Satisfaction2 WeeksSubjective Response for Vision satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Subjective Response for Overall Vision QualityBaseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispenseSubjective Response for Overall Vision quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Horizontal Lens CentrationBaseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispenseHorizontal Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Nasal decentration given +ve value. temporal decentration given -ve value)
Vertical Lens CentrationBaseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispenseVertical Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Superior decentration given +ve value, inferior decentration given -ve value)
Post-blink MovementBaseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispensePost-blink movement assessed on the amount of lens movement to the nearest 0.1mm immediately after the blink
Lens Horizontal Mobility RatingBaseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispenseLens Horizontal Mobility Rating on a scale of 0-4 (0-immobile, 1- restricted, 2- secure, 3- unrestricted, 4- very mobile)
Subjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionBaseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispenseOverall comfort satisfaction analyzed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Overall Lens Fit AcceptanceBaseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispenseOverall Lens Fit Acceptance assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0-Can't be worn, 1- Poor but acceptable, 2- Fair, 3- Good, 4- Optimum)
Lens Handling Satisfaction2 weeksLens handling satisfaction assessed on a 7-point Likert Scales (Very satisfied, satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Subjective Overall Lens Handling2 weeksSubjectiveOverall Lens handling assessed on a scale of 0-100 (0- cannot be managed, 100- Excellent handling)
Corneal Staining ExtentBaseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispenseCorneal staining extent will be assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0- No Staining, 1- 1 to 15% of area, 2- 16 to 30% of area, 3- 31-45% of area, 4- \>45% of area).
Subjective Preference for Comfort2 weeksSubjective preference for comfort (Orion strongly, Orion slightly, No preference, Gemini slightly, Gemini strongly)
Lens Surface Wettability PerformanceBaseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispenseLens Surface wettability performance was measured on a scale of 0-4, 0.25 steps (0-Very poor, 1 - Poor, 2- Acceptable, 3- Good, 4- Excellent)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
Subjects were randomized to wear Orion daily disposable contact lenses for 2 weeks and then Gemini daily disposable contact lenses for 2 weeks in this randomized, cross-over bilateral dispensing study. Orion daily disposable contact lens Gemini daily disposable contact lens
64
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First InterventionLost to Follow-up03
First InterventionPhysician Decision10
First InterventionWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
64 Participants
Age, Continuous23 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
64 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 640 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 640 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 640 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality

Subjective Response for Overall Vision quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)

Time frame: Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision Quality90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision Quality91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Primary

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision Quality86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision Quality89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Primary

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)

Time frame: 2 weeks - Night Driving

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision Quality87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision Quality88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Primary

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Satisfaction

Subjective Response for Vision satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: 2 Weeks - at night

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionDissatisfied0 percentage of participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 percentage of participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery satisfied42 percentage of participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSatisfied41 percentage of participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied8 percentage of participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionNeither7 percentage of participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied2 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied10 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied5 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionDissatisfied0 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSatisfied48 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionNeither3 percentage of participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery satisfied34 percentage of participants
Primary

Subjective Response for Overall Vision Satisfaction

Subjective Response for Vision satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied7 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied3 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSatisfied22 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionDissatisfied1 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionNeither0 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery satisfied26 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionVery satisfied28 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSatisfied24 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied5 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionNeither1 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied1 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Overall Vision SatisfactionDissatisfied0 Participants
Primary

Subjective Response for Vision Satisfaction

Subjective Response for Vision Satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionSatisfied30 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionNeither1 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionVery satisfied24 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied0 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied4 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionDissatisfied0 Participants
OrionSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionDissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionVery satisfied28 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionSatisfied24 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied7 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionNeither0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Response for Vision SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Corneal Staining Extent

Corneal staining extent will be assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0- No Staining, 1- 1 to 15% of area, 2- 16 to 30% of area, 3- 31-45% of area, 4- \>45% of area).

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentNasal0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentSuperior0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentTemporal0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentInferior0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentCentral0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentInferior0.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentCentral0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentNasal0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentTemporal0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentSuperior0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Corneal Staining Extent

Corneal staining extent will be assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0- No Staining, 1- 1 to 15% of area, 2- 16 to 30% of area, 3- 31-45% of area, 4- \>45% of area).

Time frame: Baseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentNasal0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentSuperior0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentTemporal000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentInferior0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
OrionCorneal Staining ExtentCentral0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentInferior0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentCentral0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentNasal0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentTemporal0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
GeminiCorneal Staining ExtentSuperior0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Horizontal Lens Centration

Horizontal Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Nasal decentration given +ve value. temporal decentration given -ve value)

Time frame: Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionHorizontal Lens Centration-0.12 mmStandard Deviation 0.25
GeminiHorizontal Lens Centration-0.18 mmStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

Horizontal Lens Centration

Horizontal Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Nasal decentration given +ve value. temporal decentration given -ve value)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionHorizontal Lens Centration-0.13 mmStandard Deviation 0.27
GeminiHorizontal Lens Centration-0.17 mmStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Lens Handling Satisfaction

Lens handling satisfaction assessed on a 7-point Likert Scales (Very satisfied, satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OrionLens Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied1 Participants
OrionLens Handling Satisfactionsatisfied20 Participants
OrionLens Handling SatisfactionSomewhat satisfied8 Participants
OrionLens Handling SatisfactionNeither2 Participants
OrionLens Handling SatisfactionVery satisfied27 Participants
OrionLens Handling SatisfactionDissatisfied1 Participants
OrionLens Handling SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiLens Handling SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiLens Handling SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied3 Participants
GeminiLens Handling SatisfactionVery satisfied14 Participants
GeminiLens Handling SatisfactionDissatisfied1 Participants
GeminiLens Handling Satisfactionsatisfied27 Participants
GeminiLens Handling SatisfactionNeither3 Participants
GeminiLens Handling SatisfactionSomewhat satisfied11 Participants
Secondary

Lens Horizontal Mobility Rating

Lens Horizontal Mobility Rating on a scale of 0-4 (0-immobile, 1- restricted, 2- secure, 3- unrestricted, 4- very mobile)

Time frame: Baseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionLens Horizontal Mobility Rating2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
GeminiLens Horizontal Mobility Rating2.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Lens Horizontal Mobility Rating

Lens Horizontal Mobility Rating on a scale of 0-4 (0-immobile, 1- restricted, 2- secure, 3- unrestricted, 4- very mobile)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionLens Horizontal Mobility Rating2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
GeminiLens Horizontal Mobility Rating2.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Lens Surface Wettability Performance

Lens Surface wettability performance was measured on a scale of 0-4, 0.25 steps (0-Very poor, 1 - Poor, 2- Acceptable, 3- Good, 4- Excellent)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionLens Surface Wettability Performance3.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
GeminiLens Surface Wettability Performance3.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Lens Surface Wettability Performance

Lens Surface wettability performance was measured on a scale of 0-4, 0.25 steps (0-Very poor, 1 - Poor, 2- Acceptable, 3- Good, 4- Excellent)

Time frame: Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionLens Surface Wettability Performance3.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
GeminiLens Surface Wettability Performance3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Overall Lens Fit Acceptance

Overall Lens Fit Acceptance assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0-Can't be worn, 1- Poor but acceptable, 2- Fair, 3- Good, 4- Optimum)

Time frame: Baseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionOverall Lens Fit Acceptance3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
GeminiOverall Lens Fit Acceptance3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Secondary

Overall Lens Fit Acceptance

Overall Lens Fit Acceptance assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0-Can't be worn, 1- Poor but acceptable, 2- Fair, 3- Good, 4- Optimum)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionOverall Lens Fit Acceptance3.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
GeminiOverall Lens Fit Acceptance3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Secondary

Post-blink Movement

Post-blink movement assessed on the amount of lens movement to the nearest 0.1mm immediately after the blink

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionPost-blink Movement0.29 mmStandard Deviation 0.08
GeminiPost-blink Movement0.32 mmStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Post-blink Movement

Post-blink movement assessed on the amount of lens movement to the nearest 0.1mm immediately after the blink

Time frame: Baseline - after 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionPost-blink Movement0.28 mmStandard Deviation 0.08
GeminiPost-blink Movement0.29 mmStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Subjective Overall Comfort Satisfaction

Overall comfort satisfaction analyzed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSatisfied25 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionNeither0 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery satisfied22 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied4 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat satisfied6 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionDissatisfied2 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionDissatisfied3 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery satisfied17 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSatisfied19 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat satisfied14 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionNeither2 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied4 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Overall Comfort Satisfaction

Overall comfort satisfaction analyzed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)

Time frame: Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat satisfied7 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied0 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSatisfied20 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionDissatisfied0 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionNeither0 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
OrionSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery satisfied32 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionVery satisfied31 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSatisfied22 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat satisfied6 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionNeither0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionSomewhat Dissatisfied0 Participants
GeminiSubjective Overall Comfort SatisfactionDissatisfied0 Participants
Secondary

Subjective Overall Lens Handling

SubjectiveOverall Lens handling assessed on a scale of 0-100 (0- cannot be managed, 100- Excellent handling)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionSubjective Overall Lens Handling87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
GeminiSubjective Overall Lens Handling83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Secondary

Subjective Preference for Comfort

Subjective preference for comfort (Orion strongly, Orion slightly, No preference, Gemini slightly, Gemini strongly)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
OrionSubjective Preference for ComfortOrion strongly13 Participants
OrionSubjective Preference for ComfortOrion slightly21 Participants
OrionSubjective Preference for ComfortNo preference10 Participants
OrionSubjective Preference for ComfortGemini slightly7 Participants
OrionSubjective Preference for ComfortGemini strongly8 Participants
Secondary

Vertical Lens Centration

Vertical Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Superior decentration given +ve value, inferior decentration given -ve value)

Time frame: Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionVertical Lens Centration0.03 mmStandard Deviation 27
GeminiVertical Lens Centration0.06 mmStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Vertical Lens Centration

Vertical Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Superior decentration given +ve value, inferior decentration given -ve value)

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OrionVertical Lens Centration0.09 mmStandard Deviation 0.27
GeminiVertical Lens Centration0.12 mmStandard Deviation 0.32

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026