Skip to content

A Study of Rilematovir in Infants and Children and Subsequently in Neonates Hospitalized With Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rilematovir in Infants and Children (≥28 Days to ≤5 Years of Age) and Subsequently in Neonates (<28 Days of Age), Hospitalized With Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04583280
Acronym
DAISY
Enrollment
28
Registered
2020-10-12
Start date
2021-09-06
Completion date
2022-03-18
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Tract Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of rilematovir compared to placebo treatment with respect to the clinical outcome on the RSV Recovery Scale (RRS).

Detailed description

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a negative-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus belonging to the Pneumoviridae family, is considered the most important cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants and young children. In most patients, RSV results in upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) eliciting common cold-like symptoms, which might last up to 2 weeks, and are usually self-limiting. RSV-related LRTI is a major cause of hospital admissions and death in young children worldwide. Rilematovir is an investigational, small molecule, RSV fusion inhibitor. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rilematovir in hospitalized infants and children (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 28 days to less than or equal to \[\<=\] 5 years) and, subsequent to completion of the neonatal substudy, in hospitalized neonates (born at term, less than \[\<\] 28 days of age) with RSV infection. The study will include a Screening Period, a Treatment Period, and a Follow-up Period. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 36 days (Screening included). The efficacy assessments include evaluation under the RRS and the safety assessments include evaluations of physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, and adverse events.

Interventions

Participants of age group greater than or equal to (\>=) 28 days to less than (\<) 3 months (age group 1) or \>= 3 months to \< 6 months (age group 2) or \>= 6 months to less than or equal to (\<=) 5 years (age group 3) will receive rilematovir orally twice a day (BID) from Days 1 to Day 7 or Day 8.

DRUGRilematovir X mg/kg

Participants of age group birth at term (after at least 37 weeks of gestation) to \< 28 days (age group 4) will receive rilematovir orally BID from Days 1 to Day 7 or Day 8. The dose is dependent on outcome of the substudy in neonates and following independent data monitoring (IDMC) review and recommendation.

DRUGPlacebo

Participant of age group 1, 2, 3 and 4 will receive matching placebo of rilematovir BID from Days 1 to Day 7 or Day 8 as per assigned age group.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participant weighs within greater than or equal to (\>=) 2.4 kilograms (kg) and less than or equal to (\<=) 24.6 kg * Each participant's parent(s) (preferably both if available or as per local requirements) or their legally acceptable representative(s) has/have signed an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that (s)he understands the purpose of, and procedures required for, the study; is willing for their child to participate in the study; with regards to the concomitant medication, the lifestyle consideration and study procedures and assessments to be performed by the parent(s)/caregiver(s) as well as those by the investigator/study site personnel * The participant has an acute respiratory illness with at least 1 of the signs/symptoms within 24 hours prior to start of screening and at screening, as evaluated by the investigator in Upper respiratory tract infection: nasal congestion or rhinorrhea; and Lower respiratory tract infection: increased respiratory effort (as evidenced by subcostal, intercostal or tracheosternal retractions, grunting, head bobbing, nasal flaring, or tachypnea), wheezing, cough, cyanosis, or apnea; and systemic/general: feeding difficulties (defined as \<75 percent \[%\] intake of normal food amounts); dehydration; fever; disturbed sleep, or disturbed activity level (irritable/restless/agitated/less responsive). Cough or wheezing cannot be the only LRTI sign/symptom present, that is, at least one other LRTI sign/symptom needs to be present for eligibility * The time of onset of RSV signs/symptoms to the anticipated time of randomization must be less than or equal to (\<=) 3 days. Onset of signs/symptoms is defined as the time of the day (or part of the day if time of the day cannot be specified) the parent(s)/caregiver(s) became aware of the first sign and/or symptom consistent with respiratory or systemic/general manifestation of signs/symptoms of RSV infection. The time of sign/symptom onset has to be assessed as accurately as possible * Participants are otherwise healthy or have (a) risk factor(s) for severe RSV disease

Exclusion criteria

* The participant has had either confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (test positive) during the four weeks prior to randomization, or close contact with a person with COVID-19 (test confirmed or suspected SARS CoV-2 infection) within 14 days prior to randomization * Confirmed QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF) interval greater than (\>) 450 milliseconds (msec) per the machine read parameter result at screening. Presence of an abnormal QTcF interval should be confirmed by repeat electrocardiogram (ECG) recording during screening * Known personal or family history of Long QT Syndrome or sudden cardiac death * Presence of repetitive ventricular premature contractions (\>10/minutes \[min\]), second- or third-degree heart block, or complete or incomplete left bundle branch block, or complete right bundle branch block per the machine read ECG result at screening. Presence of any of the above abnormalities should be confirmed by repeat ECG recording during screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryBaseline to Day 8RRS was an ordinal scale to assess a participant's clinical status. The RRS provided 7 mutually exclusive categories ordered from best (1) to worst (7) where 1 =home without signs/symptoms, 2 =home with sign/symptoms, 3 =ward without supplemental oxygen (O2) or feeding/hydration, 4 =ward with supplemental or feeding/hydration, 5 =intensive care unit (ICU) without mechanical ventilation (included both invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation), 6 =required mechanical ventilation and 7=worst (death). Higher category indicates worse condition. With or without signs/symptoms was defined as the key RSV signs/symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, cough, wheezing/breathing sounds, and tachycardia) resolved (absent or mild) or not resolved assessed by parent/caregiver.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadBaseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load was analyzed.
Plasma Concentrations of Rilematovir1 hour Post-dose (Day 1) and pre-dose (Day 2)Plasma concentrations of rilematovir were assessed. Participant wise data were reported for this outcome measure.
Time From First Study Dose to Resolution of Key RSV Signs/Symptoms Based on Observer Reported Outcome (ObsRO) After Free of Supplementation (Oxygen/Feeding/Hydration) for at Least 24 HoursUp to Day 21Time (in hours) from first dose of study intervention to first resolution of key RSV signs/symptoms was evaluated based on ObsRO assessment after free of supplementation (O2/feeding/hydration) for at least 24 hours. Clinically resolved was defined as participant required no oxygen supplementation, no supplemental feeding/hydration, no need for ICU and had key RSV signs/symptoms resolved to absent or mild as per ObsRO signs/symptoms. Resolution of key signs/symptoms assessment was based on observations of child's parent/caregiver as resolved if no retractions, tachypnea, tachycardia, breathing problems (gasping for air nostrils, flaring when breathing, head bobbed back and forth when breathing), no breathing sound; cough (no coughing, little coughing without problems). Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.
Number of Participants With Post-baseline RSV-related ComplicationsUp to Day 35RSV related complications included respiratory complications (respiratory failure, apnoeic attacks, bronchiolitis, bronchial obstruction, pneumonia and asthmatic crisis), infectious complications (otitis media, bacterial respiratory tract infections and sepsis), cardiovascular complications (arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, hemodynamic instability, congestive cardiac failure), acid-base or electrolyte complications (metabolic acidosis, metabolic alkalosis, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia). Participants were counted only once, regardless of the number of complications they actually experienced.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Day 1 up to Day 35An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset after the initiation study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (Day 35). AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesUp to Day 35Number of participants with abnormally low (AL) and abnormally high (AH) values of bicarbonate, direct bilirubin, urea nitrogen, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocyte (Ery). mean corpuscular hemoglobin (HGB) concentration (conc), Ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin, erythrocytes, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and reticulocytes were reported based on the investigator's discretion.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Up to Day 35Number of participants with abnormally low and abnormally high values of ECG parameters (PR interval and RR interval) as assessed based on the investigator's discretion were reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsUp to Day 35Number of participants with abnormally low and abnormally high values of vital signs from baseline were assessed based on investigator's discretion. Vital signs included systolic blood pressure (SBP) (millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\]), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg), pulse rate (beats per minute), respiratory rate (breaths per minute), temperature (degree Celsius) and oxygen saturation (in percentage).
Percentage of Participants Requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay After First Dose of RilematovirUp to Day 35Percentage of participants requiring ICU stay was analyzed and reported.
Percentage of Participants Clinically Resolved From RSV Disease Based on the Clinician Reported Outcome (ClinRO) Sign/Symptoms at Day 8Day 8Clinically resolved was defined as participant required no oxygen supplementation, no supplemental feeding/hydration, no need for ICU and had Key RSV signs/symptoms resolved to absent or mild as per ClinRO signs/symptoms. Clinically resolved Key RSV signs/symptoms were assessed based on clinician's observations as resolved if participant had no retractions, tachypnea, tachycardia, breathing problems (nasal flaring, head bobbing, grunting); cough (resolved if little or no coughing or occasional strong cough or sometimes productive) and wheezing (resolved if no wheezing or terminal expiratory wheezing or only with stethoscope).
Percentage of Participants Requiring Re-hospitalization for Respiratory/Other ReasonsUp to Day 35Percentage of participants requiring re-hospitalization (participants re-hospitalized \[ward or ICU\] after been discharged from hospital) for respiratory/other reasons were reported.
Percentage of Participants Requiring Oxygen Supplementation After First Dose of RilematovirUp to Day 35Percentage of participants requiring any type of oxygen supplementation (invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation) were reported.
Duration of Oxygen SupplementationUp to Day 35Duration (in hours) of oxygen supplementation was defined as total number of hours a participant used supplemental oxygen from either prior to first dose and/or after first dose of drug until study termination, calculated as the sum of all separate records of supplementation.
Percentage of Participants Requiring Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube After First Dose of RilematovirUp to Day 35Percentage of participants requiring any type of hydration and/or feeding by intravenous (IV) administration or nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was reported.
Duration of Supplemental Feeding/HydrationUp to Day 35Duration (in hours) of supplemental feeding/hydration was defined as total number of hours a participant was administered feeding/hydration supplementation from either prior to first dose and/or after first dose of drug until study termination, calculated as the sum all separate records of supplementation use per participant.
Number of Participants With Medical Encounters and TreatmentsUp to Day 35Medical resource utilization was assessed by medical care encounters and treatments. Medical encounters and treatments included physician or emergency room visits, tests and procedures, and medications, surgeries and other selected procedures, inpatient and outpatient.
RSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Antiviral activity was determined based on measurements of RSV viral load which was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the mid-turbinate (MT) nasal swab specimens.
Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Antiviral activity was determined based on measurements of RSV viral load which was measured by qRT-PCR in the MT nasal swab specimens.
Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Day 8Acceptability and palatability were assessed by clinician electronic clinical outcome assessment (eCOA) questionnaire which consisted of 7 questions, 1- child took medicine easily, 2- disgusted expressions after tasting medicine, 3- cried after tasting medicine, 4- would not open mouth or turned head away to avoid medicine, 5- spit out or coughed out medicine, 6- gagged, 7- vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine).
Duration of ICU StayUp to Day 35Duration (in hours) of ICU stay was defined as total number of hours a participant experienced an ICU stay from first dose of rilematovir until study termination, calculated as the sum of all separate records of ICU stay.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Czechia, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico, Panama, Poland, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 28 participants with acute respiratory tract infection due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were randomized and treated (8 participants in placebo arm and 20 participants in rilematovir arm). Of these, 27 participants completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants aged greater than or equal to (\>=) 28 days to less than (\<) 3 months, \>=3 to \<6 months, and \>=6 months to less than or equal to (\<=) 5 years received placebo matching to rilematovir as oral suspension twice daily (BID) from Days 1 to 7 (14 consecutive doses).
8
Rilematovir
Participants aged \>=28 days to \<3 months, \>=3 to \<6 months, and \>=6 months to \<=5 years received rilematovir 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 3 mg/kg and 4.5 mg/kg respectively, as oral suspension BID from Days 1 to 7 (14 consecutive doses).
20
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by parent/caregiver01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboRilematovirTotal
Age, Continuous15.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
16.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.67
15.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.14
Age, Customized
Children (2-11 years)
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Age, Customized
Infants and toddlers(28 days-23 months)
6 Participants14 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
6 Participants14 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants8 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 810 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 81 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) Category

RRS was an ordinal scale to assess a participant's clinical status. The RRS provided 7 mutually exclusive categories ordered from best (1) to worst (7) where 1 =home without signs/symptoms, 2 =home with sign/symptoms, 3 =ward without supplemental oxygen (O2) or feeding/hydration, 4 =ward with supplemental or feeding/hydration, 5 =intensive care unit (ICU) without mechanical ventilation (included both invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation), 6 =required mechanical ventilation and 7=worst (death). Higher category indicates worse condition. With or without signs/symptoms was defined as the key RSV signs/symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, cough, wheezing/breathing sounds, and tachycardia) resolved (absent or mild) or not resolved assessed by parent/caregiver.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 8

Population: Intent to treat - infected (ITT-i) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Due to the early termination of study, last day of RRS treatment (Day 8) was considered instead of the original planned day defined as when 50% participants would have been discharged.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryHome without symptoms25.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryICU without mechanical ventilation0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryWard without supplemental oxygen/feeding/hydration25.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryRequiring mechanical ventilation0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryHome with symptoms50.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryDeath0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryWard with supplemental or feeding/hydration0 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryDeath0 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryHome with symptoms26.3 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryWard without supplemental oxygen/feeding/hydration36.8 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryWard with supplemental or feeding/hydration5.3 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryICU without mechanical ventilation0 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryRequiring mechanical ventilation0 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants by Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Recovery Scale (RRS) CategoryHome without symptoms31.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Antiviral activity was determined based on measurements of RSV viral load which was measured by qRT-PCR in the MT nasal swab specimens.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants with data evaluable at each specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 2-1.031 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 0.6091
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 3-1.566 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 2.2167
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 5-2.965 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.9154
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 8-5.658 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.9872
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 14-5.693 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 2.2654
PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 21-7.207 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.3201
RilematovirChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 14-5.640 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 2.0261
RilematovirChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 2-0.825 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.2906
RilematovirChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 8-4.126 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.8461
RilematovirChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 3-1.436 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.5185
RilematovirChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 21-5.789 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.956
RilematovirChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load at Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 5-2.241 log10 copies per milliterStandard Deviation 1.3393
Secondary

Duration of ICU Stay

Duration (in hours) of ICU stay was defined as total number of hours a participant experienced an ICU stay from first dose of rilematovir until study termination, calculated as the sum of all separate records of ICU stay.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who required ICU stay before first dose of rilematovir and continued after first dose plus participants who required ICU stay after first dose of drug without prior ICU stay.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDuration of ICU Stay66.46 hoursStandard Deviation 24.145
RilematovirDuration of ICU Stay40.83 hoursStandard Deviation 22.822
Secondary

Duration of Oxygen Supplementation

Duration (in hours) of oxygen supplementation was defined as total number of hours a participant used supplemental oxygen from either prior to first dose and/or after first dose of drug until study termination, calculated as the sum of all separate records of supplementation.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who required oxygen supplementation before first dose of rilematovir and continued after first dose plus participants who required oxygen supplementation after first dose of rilematovir without prior oxygen supplementation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDuration of Oxygen Supplementation39.91 HoursStandard Deviation 26.146
RilematovirDuration of Oxygen Supplementation66.59 HoursStandard Deviation 51.956
Secondary

Duration of Supplemental Feeding/Hydration

Duration (in hours) of supplemental feeding/hydration was defined as total number of hours a participant was administered feeding/hydration supplementation from either prior to first dose and/or after first dose of drug until study termination, calculated as the sum all separate records of supplementation use per participant.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who required supplemental feeding/hydration before first dose of rilematovir and continued after first dose plus participants who required supplemental feeding/hydration after first dose of rilematovir without prior supplemental feeding/hydration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDuration of Supplemental Feeding/Hydration43.13 HoursStandard Deviation 41.526
RilematovirDuration of Supplemental Feeding/Hydration31.96 HoursStandard Deviation 21.311
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Values

Number of participants with abnormally low (AL) and abnormally high (AH) values of bicarbonate, direct bilirubin, urea nitrogen, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocyte (Ery). mean corpuscular hemoglobin (HGB) concentration (conc), Ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin, erythrocytes, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and reticulocytes were reported based on the investigator's discretion.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants with available data at each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBicarbonate- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular hemoglobin-AH0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesUrea nitrogen- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesErythrocytes- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesMonocytes- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesErythrocytes- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBasophils- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLeukocytes- Abnormally low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesDirect bilirubin- Abnormally low2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLeukocytes- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBasophils- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLymphocytes- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBicarbonate- Abnormally low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLymphocytes- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEosinophils- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesMonocytes- Abnormally low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesDirect bilirubin- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEosinophils- Abnormally high5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesNeutrophils- Abnormally low4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular HGB conc.-AH0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesNeutrophils- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular HGB conc.-AL1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesReticulocytes- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesUrea nitrogen- Abnormally low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesReticulocytes- Abnormally high1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular hemoglobin-AL0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesReticulocytes- Abnormally high1 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBicarbonate- Abnormally low3 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBicarbonate- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesDirect bilirubin- Abnormally low9 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesDirect bilirubin- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesUrea nitrogen- Abnormally low3 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesUrea nitrogen- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBasophils- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesBasophils- Abnormally high1 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEosinophils- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEosinophils- Abnormally high12 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular HGB conc.-AH0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular hemoglobin-AL3 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular hemoglobin-AH0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesErythrocytes- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesErythrocytes- Abnormally high2 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLeukocytes- Abnormally low1 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLeukocytes- Abnormally high5 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLymphocytes- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesLymphocytes- Abnormally high3 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesMonocytes- Abnormally low4 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesMonocytes- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesNeutrophils- Abnormally low10 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesNeutrophils- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesReticulocytes- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory ValuesEry. mean corpuscular HGB conc.-AL3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

Number of participants with abnormally low and abnormally high values of ECG parameters (PR interval and RR interval) as assessed based on the investigator's discretion were reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)PR Interval- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)RR Interval- Abnormally low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)PR Interval- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)RR Interval- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)RR Interval- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)PR Interval- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)PR Interval- Abnormally high1 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECGs)RR Interval- Abnormally low7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital Signs

Number of participants with abnormally low and abnormally high values of vital signs from baseline were assessed based on investigator's discretion. Vital signs included systolic blood pressure (SBP) (millimeter of mercury \[mmHg\]), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg), pulse rate (beats per minute), respiratory rate (breaths per minute), temperature (degree Celsius) and oxygen saturation (in percentage).

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants with available data at each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsRespiratory Rate- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP- Abnormally high1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsRespiratory Rate- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsTemperature - Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsPulse Rate- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsTemperature - Abnormally high1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP- Abnormally low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsPulse Rate- Abnormally high1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsOxygen Saturation- Abnormally high0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsOxygen Saturation- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsOxygen Saturation- Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsSBP- Abnormally high4 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsDBP- Abnormally high3 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsPulse Rate- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsPulse Rate- Abnormally high2 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsRespiratory Rate- Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsRespiratory Rate- Abnormally high3 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsTemperature - Abnormally low0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsTemperature - Abnormally high0 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Vital SignsOxygen Saturation- Abnormally low1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Medical Encounters and Treatments

Medical resource utilization was assessed by medical care encounters and treatments. Medical encounters and treatments included physician or emergency room visits, tests and procedures, and medications, surgeries and other selected procedures, inpatient and outpatient.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Medical Encounters and Treatments1 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Medical Encounters and Treatments3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Post-baseline RSV-related Complications

RSV related complications included respiratory complications (respiratory failure, apnoeic attacks, bronchiolitis, bronchial obstruction, pneumonia and asthmatic crisis), infectious complications (otitis media, bacterial respiratory tract infections and sepsis), cardiovascular complications (arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, hemodynamic instability, congestive cardiac failure), acid-base or electrolyte complications (metabolic acidosis, metabolic alkalosis, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia). Participants were counted only once, regardless of the number of complications they actually experienced.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Post-baseline RSV-related Complications1 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Post-baseline RSV-related Complications3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset after the initiation study drug (Day 1) up to end of study (Day 35). AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 35

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)5 Participants
RilematovirNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)11 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Clinically Resolved From RSV Disease Based on the Clinician Reported Outcome (ClinRO) Sign/Symptoms at Day 8

Clinically resolved was defined as participant required no oxygen supplementation, no supplemental feeding/hydration, no need for ICU and had Key RSV signs/symptoms resolved to absent or mild as per ClinRO signs/symptoms. Clinically resolved Key RSV signs/symptoms were assessed based on clinician's observations as resolved if participant had no retractions, tachypnea, tachycardia, breathing problems (nasal flaring, head bobbing, grunting); cough (resolved if little or no coughing or occasional strong cough or sometimes productive) and wheezing (resolved if no wheezing or terminal expiratory wheezing or only with stethoscope).

Time frame: Day 8

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Clinically Resolved From RSV Disease Based on the Clinician Reported Outcome (ClinRO) Sign/Symptoms at Day 837.5 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants Clinically Resolved From RSV Disease Based on the Clinician Reported Outcome (ClinRO) Sign/Symptoms at Day 831.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube After First Dose of Rilematovir

Percentage of participants requiring any type of hydration and/or feeding by intravenous (IV) administration or nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants with no use of feeding/hydration supplementation before 1st dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Requiring Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube After First Dose of Rilematovir33.3 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants Requiring Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube After First Dose of Rilematovir0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay After First Dose of Rilematovir

Percentage of participants requiring ICU stay was analyzed and reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants with no ICU stay before first dose of rilematovir.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay After First Dose of Rilematovir0 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants Requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay After First Dose of Rilematovir0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Oxygen Supplementation After First Dose of Rilematovir

Percentage of participants requiring any type of oxygen supplementation (invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation and non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation) were reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants with no use of oxygen supplementation before first dose of rilematovir.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Requiring Oxygen Supplementation After First Dose of Rilematovir16.7 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants Requiring Oxygen Supplementation After First Dose of Rilematovir30.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Requiring Re-hospitalization for Respiratory/Other Reasons

Percentage of participants requiring re-hospitalization (participants re-hospitalized \[ward or ICU\] after been discharged from hospital) for respiratory/other reasons were reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 35

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Requiring Re-hospitalization for Respiratory/Other Reasons0 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants Requiring Re-hospitalization for Respiratory/Other Reasons0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)

Acceptability and palatability were assessed by clinician electronic clinical outcome assessment (eCOA) questionnaire which consisted of 7 questions, 1- child took medicine easily, 2- disgusted expressions after tasting medicine, 3- cried after tasting medicine, 4- would not open mouth or turned head away to avoid medicine, 5- spit out or coughed out medicine, 6- gagged, 7- vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine).

Time frame: Day 8

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, N (Overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Disgusted expressions after tasting medicine0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Spit out or coughed out medicine14.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Gagged0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Child took medicine easily85.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine)0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Did not open mouth or turned head away14.3 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine)0 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Child took medicine easily86.7 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Disgusted expressions after tasting medicine13.3 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Did not open mouth or turned head away6.7 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Gagged6.7 Percentage of participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the Rilematovir Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Spit out or coughed out medicine0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load

Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants with data evaluable at each specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 30 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 862.5 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 20 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 1471.4 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 50 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 2185.7 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadBaseline0 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 2188.2 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadBaseline0 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 20 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 35.3 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 50 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 844.4 Percentage of Participants
RilematovirPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral LoadDay 1476.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Rilematovir

Plasma concentrations of rilematovir were assessed. Participant wise data were reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: 1 hour Post-dose (Day 1) and pre-dose (Day 2)

Population: Pharmacokinetics analysis set (PKAS) included participants who had received at least 1 dose of rilematovir and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for pharmacokinetics analysis. No summary analysis was done as study was terminated early and participant wise data were reported. Here, n (Number analyzed) signifies specific participant with data evaluable at each specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 2 Day 2281 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 3 Day 25.74 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 5 Day 2417 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 1 Day 11450 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 2 Day 11750 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 3 Day 172.5 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 4 Day 1656 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 5 Day 1918 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 6 Day 11050 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 7 Day 1135 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 8 Day 11730 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 9 Day 1602 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 10 Day 11810 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 11 Day 11640 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 12 Day 13760 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 13 Day 1561 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 14 Day 1127 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 15 Day 1787 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 16 Day 12020 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 17 Day 1157 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 18 Day 11260 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 1 Day 2134 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 6 Day 2828 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 7 Day 21030 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 8 Day 2339 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 9 Day 2186 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 10 Day 2687 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 11 Day 21750 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 12 Day 24650 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 13 Day 2311 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 14 Day 277.3 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 15 Day 2749 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 16 Day 2457 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 17 Day 2493 nanogram per milliliter
PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of RilematovirParticipant 18 Day 22930 nanogram per milliliter
Secondary

RSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Antiviral activity was determined based on measurements of RSV viral load which was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the mid-turbinate (MT) nasal swab specimens.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had an RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants with data evaluable at each specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 35.465 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.7454
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 81.373 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.0865
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 26.000 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5678
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 141.217 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.1478
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 54.066 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5565
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 210.414 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.0961
PlaceboRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Baseline7.031 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.9995
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 210.464 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.4547
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Baseline6.286 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.3671
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 25.579 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5668
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 34.981 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.953
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 54.132 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.5199
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 82.156 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 2.1681
RilematovirRSV Viral Load at Baseline, Days 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Day 140.709 log10 copies per milliliterStandard Deviation 1.3389
Secondary

Time From First Study Dose to Resolution of Key RSV Signs/Symptoms Based on Observer Reported Outcome (ObsRO) After Free of Supplementation (Oxygen/Feeding/Hydration) for at Least 24 Hours

Time (in hours) from first dose of study intervention to first resolution of key RSV signs/symptoms was evaluated based on ObsRO assessment after free of supplementation (O2/feeding/hydration) for at least 24 hours. Clinically resolved was defined as participant required no oxygen supplementation, no supplemental feeding/hydration, no need for ICU and had key RSV signs/symptoms resolved to absent or mild as per ObsRO signs/symptoms. Resolution of key signs/symptoms assessment was based on observations of child's parent/caregiver as resolved if no retractions, tachypnea, tachycardia, breathing problems (gasping for air nostrils, flaring when breathing, head bobbed back and forth when breathing), no breathing sound; cough (no coughing, little coughing without problems). Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimation.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention and had RSV infection confirmed by central laboratory analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime From First Study Dose to Resolution of Key RSV Signs/Symptoms Based on Observer Reported Outcome (ObsRO) After Free of Supplementation (Oxygen/Feeding/Hydration) for at Least 24 Hours237.0 Hours
RilematovirTime From First Study Dose to Resolution of Key RSV Signs/Symptoms Based on Observer Reported Outcome (ObsRO) After Free of Supplementation (Oxygen/Feeding/Hydration) for at Least 24 Hours144.8 Hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026