Skip to content

Variability in Transcranial Doppler Technique in Neuro-Critical Care Patients

Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Transcranial Doppler (TCD) Technique in Neurocritical Care Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04583163
Enrollment
3
Registered
2020-10-12
Start date
2020-09-22
Completion date
2022-08-12
Last updated
2025-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Cerebral Aneurysm, Cerebral Ischemia, Stroke, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Vasospasm, Cerebral

Keywords

Transcranial Doppler, TCD, Interrater Variability, Intrarater Variability, Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound, Neurocritical Care, DCI, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, MCA, PCA, Mean Flow Velocity

Brief summary

This study aims to determine the inter- and intra-variability of Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in neuro-critical care patients who are planned for consecutive daily TCD evaluations.

Detailed description

Patients enrolled in the study are recruited from the pool of neuro-critical care patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). When the patients are admitted in the surgical ICU, the study staff will determine eligibility based on the protocol inclusion criteria. Due to the nature of the disease, there is a high likelihood that patients are either unconscious, of limited mental capacity and/or have been intubated therefore when appropriate the legally authorized representative will be utilized to obtain research consent. To meet study inclusion, transcranial Doppler (TCD) testing will be ordered as part of the standard of care for these patients. The test will not be ordered solely for research purposes. There are no known side effects from the non-invasive measurement of cerebral blood flow using ultrasound Three different TCD technicians will do triplicate readings on 3 consecutive days on up to 12 patients already undergoing TCD as ordered by their treating team. Standard of care on specific neuro critical care patients (such as cerebral aneurysms) is to undergo daily TCD monitoring to assess for possible vasospasm. Patients will be in the supine position while measurements are obtained. The probe will be placed in the preauricular region of the temporal window

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTranscranial Doppler

Transcranial Doppler is a non-invasive, painless, ultrasound technique that uses high frequency sound waves to measure the rate and direction of blood flow vessels in the brain.

Sponsors

Hackensack Meridian Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults 18 years of age or older 2. Current hospitalization for a neurologic issue and admitted to the surgical intensive care unit. 3. Undergoing daily transcranial Doppler imaging No 4. English speaking patients and/or legally authorized representative (LAR)

Exclusion criteria

1. Less than 18 years of age 2. Patient is unable to obtain consent and no LAR is identified to provide consent 3. Non-English speaking patient or LAR 4. Unable to perform the study due to lack of availability of TCD technologists

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth Measurment3 Consecutive DaysThe intra-variability (reliability or consistency within each TCD technician) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated for each technician based on the readings from the same patient. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the reliability by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.
Determine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth Measurement3 consecutive daysThe inter-variability (agreement among 3 TCD technicians) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated based on the readings from the same visit of a patient by different technician as the index for the interrater reliability or agreement among the three technicians. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the agreement by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.
Determine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV Measurement3 Consecutive DaysThe intra-variability (reliability or consistency within each TCD technician) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated for each technician based on the readings from the same patient. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the reliability by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.
Determine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV Measurement3 Consecutive DaysThe intra-variability (reliability or consistency within each TCD technician) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated for each technician based on the readings from the same patient. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the reliability by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.
Determine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV Measurement3 consecutive daysThe inter-variability (agreement among 3 TCD technicians) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated based on the readings from the same visit of a patient by different technician as the index for the interrater reliability or agreement among the three technicians. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the agreement by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.
Determine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV Measurement3 consecutive daysThe inter-variability (agreement among 3 TCD technicians) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated based on the readings from the same visit of a patient by different technician as the index for the interrater reliability or agreement among the three technicians. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the agreement by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Velocity Prompting Clinical Intervention3 Consecutive DaysDescribe the change in velocity that prompts clinical intervention in symptomatic and asymptomatic vasospasm in neuro-critical care patients.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Summary Statistics for DepthAcross three visits (during 3 consecutive days)The statistics are based on 27 measurements from those 3 subjects (27 values = 3 subjects \* 3 visits on 3 consecutive days \* 3 technicians)
Summary Statistics for Each MeasurementAcross three visits (during 3 consecutive days)For each Measurement in the following table, the statistics are based on 27 measurements from those 3 subjects (27 values = 3 subjects \* 3 visits on 3 consecutive days \* 3 technicians)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neuro-critical Care Patients Receiving Transcranial Doppler Imaging
Neuro-critical care patients receiving Transcranial Doppler Imaging in the neurocritical care unit.
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeuro-critical Care Patients Receiving Transcranial Doppler Imaging
Age, Continuous51.7 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Determine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth Measurement

The inter-variability (agreement among 3 TCD technicians) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated based on the readings from the same visit of a patient by different technician as the index for the interrater reliability or agreement among the three technicians. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the agreement by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Time frame: 3 consecutive days

Population: Readings from all enrolled participants. Only three patients were enrolled, but each patient was measured by three separate technicians at three different visits, hence the 9 readings (for 3 patients) per visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth MeasurementDepth Visit 10.938 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth MeasurementDepth Visit 20.013 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth MeasurementDepth Visit 30.904 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Primary

Determine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV Measurement

The inter-variability (agreement among 3 TCD technicians) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated based on the readings from the same visit of a patient by different technician as the index for the interrater reliability or agreement among the three technicians. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the agreement by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Time frame: 3 consecutive days

Population: Readings from all enrolled participants. Only three patients were enrolled, but each patient was measured by three separate technicians at three different visits, hence the 9 readings (for 3 patients) per visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV MeasurementEnd Diastolic Velocity (EDV) Visit 10.986 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV MeasurementEDV Visit 20.960 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV MeasurementEDV Visit 30.817 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Primary

Determine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV Measurement

The inter-variability (agreement among 3 TCD technicians) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated based on the readings from the same visit of a patient by different technician as the index for the interrater reliability or agreement among the three technicians. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the agreement by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Time frame: 3 consecutive days

Population: Readings from all enrolled participants. Only three patients were enrolled, but each patient was measured by three separate technicians at three different visits, hence the 9 readings (for 3 patients) per visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV MeasurementPeak Flow Velocity (PFV) Visit 10.974 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV MeasurementPFV Visit 20.973 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Inter-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV MeasurementPFV Visit 30.918 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Primary

Determine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth Measurment

The intra-variability (reliability or consistency within each TCD technician) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated for each technician based on the readings from the same patient. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the reliability by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Time frame: 3 Consecutive Days

Population: Readings from all enrolled participants. Only three patients were enrolled, but each patient was measured by three separate technicians at three different visits, hence the 9 readings (for 3 patients) per visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth MeasurmentDepth by Technician A-4.154 Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth MeasurmentDepth by Technician B0.219 Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - Depth MeasurmentDepth by Technician C0.008 Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
Primary

Determine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV Measurement

The intra-variability (reliability or consistency within each TCD technician) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated for each technician based on the readings from the same patient. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the reliability by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Time frame: 3 Consecutive Days

Population: Readings from all enrolled participants. Only three patients were enrolled, but each patient was measured by three separate technicians at three different visits, hence the 9 readings (for 3 patients) per visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV MeasurementEnd Diastolic Velocity (EDV) by Technician A0.979 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV MeasurementEDV by Technician B0.989 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - EDV MeasurementEDV by Technician C0.960 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Primary

Determine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV Measurement

The intra-variability (reliability or consistency within each TCD technician) was measured by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three technicians took measurements from the same patient at three different visits. The ICC is calculated for each technician based on the readings from the same patient. Based on the suggestion from Koo and Li (2016), the interpretation of the reliability by using the ICC is defined as: below 0.50 = poor, 0.50-0.75 = moderate, 0.76-0.90 = good, above 090 = excellent.

Time frame: 3 Consecutive Days

Population: Readings from all enrolled participants. Only three patients were enrolled, but each patient was measured by three separate technicians at three different visits, hence the 9 readings (for 3 patients) per visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV MeasurementPeak Flow Velocity (PFV) by Technician A0.985 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV MeasurementPFV by Technician B0.982 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
All ParticipantsDetermine the Intra-variability of TCD Ultrasound - PFV MeasurementPFV by Technician C0.963 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
Secondary

Change in Velocity Prompting Clinical Intervention

Describe the change in velocity that prompts clinical intervention in symptomatic and asymptomatic vasospasm in neuro-critical care patients.

Time frame: 3 Consecutive Days

Population: Number of patients who had clinical interventions based on the change in velocity observed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsChange in Velocity Prompting Clinical Intervention0 participants
Other Pre-specified

Summary Statistics for Depth

The statistics are based on 27 measurements from those 3 subjects (27 values = 3 subjects \* 3 visits on 3 consecutive days \* 3 technicians)

Time frame: Across three visits (during 3 consecutive days)

Population: Based on 27 measurements from those 3 subjects (27 values = 3 subjects \* 3 visits during 3 consecutive days\* 3 technicians)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsSummary Statistics for Depth6.8 mmStandard Deviation 7.3
Other Pre-specified

Summary Statistics for Each Measurement

For each Measurement in the following table, the statistics are based on 27 measurements from those 3 subjects (27 values = 3 subjects \* 3 visits on 3 consecutive days \* 3 technicians)

Time frame: Across three visits (during 3 consecutive days)

Population: Based on 27 measurements from those 3 subjects (27 values = 3 subjects \* 3 visits during 3 consecutive days\* 3 technicians)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsSummary Statistics for Each Measurement37.4 cm/secStandard Deviation 13.7
Mean Flow Velocity (MFV)Summary Statistics for Each Measurement125.68 cm/secStandard Deviation 29.77
Peak Flow Velocity (PFV)Summary Statistics for Each Measurement100.8 cm/secStandard Deviation 21.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026