Skip to content

Neubotulinum Toxin Injection in Cerivical Dystonia

24-Week Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Cross-over Design in Multicenter Study of 50 Unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 Unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) Injection for Cervical Dystonia in Thai Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04582929
Acronym
NTCD
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-10-12
Start date
2019-01-03
Completion date
2021-05-30
Last updated
2021-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Dystonia

Brief summary

24-Week Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Cross-over design in Multicenter Study of 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) injection for Cervical Dystonia in patient diagnosed with cervical dystonia according to clinical diagnosis. It was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, quality of life and the comparesion the improvement after treatment by of 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) injection.

Detailed description

Three documented studies showed the clinical use of botulinum toxin for migraine prophylaxis.(26) Neubotulinum Toxin Type A, (Neu-BoNT/A), (Neuronox® ) (Medytox Inc, Ochang-eup, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea), also known as Meditoxin in Korea, is a newly manufactured BoNT-A (Neu-BoNT/A) that was developed to provide features close to onabotulinum toxin A (5). Neuronox was tested in a murine model, and its effect on muscle force generation was equivalent to Botox® (ona-BoNT/A) (6). A previous multicenter randomized controlled trial showed that Neuronox and Botox® have equivalent efficacy and safety for the treatment of spastic equinus in children with cerebral palsy (6). However, 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 100 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) has not yet been investigated in cervical dystonia. This study is the extension of the NCT03805152

Interventions

DRUGNeuronox ® Injection

Neuronox ® 50 or 100 unit intramuscular injection

Sponsors

Department of Medical Services Ministry of Public Health of Thailand
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

complete Double Blind randomized controlled trial

Intervention model description

Crossover Assignment Double Blind randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

•The subject has to grant permission to enter into the study by signing and dating the informed consent form before completing any study-related procedure such as any assessment or evaluation not related to the normal medical care of the subject. Able to give written inform consent and retained one copy of the consent form * Male or female subject, aged between 18 - 100 years old. * Subject diagnosed to be cervical dystonia. * Female subject in good health and sexually active was instructed by the investigator to avoid pregnancy during the study and to use condom or other contraceptive measure if necessary. The subject was required to have a negative urine pregnancy test before being eligible for the study. (At each of the subsequent visit, a urine pregnancy test was performed). * Subject judged to be reliable for compliance for taking medication and capable of recording the effects of the medication and motivated in receiving benefits from the treatment. * Subject should undergo a normal physical and neurological examination TWSTRS, CDIP-58, SF36, and CES-D • during the whole study period

Exclusion criteria

* The subject was pregnant or lactating. * The subject was a female at risk of pregnancy during the study and not taking adequate precautions against pregnancy. * The subject had a known hypersensitivity to any of the test materials or related compounds. * The subject was unable or unwilling to comply fully with the protocol. * The subject received any unlicensed drug within the previous 6 months. * Treatment with investigational drug (s) within 6 months before the screening visit. • The subject had previously entered in this study. Subject with past history of botulism, other neuromuscular disorder (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert - Elton Syndrome) * Subject with significant medical / neurological / psychiatric disorders such as blood dyscrasia, thrombocytopenia, rheumatoid arthritis, congestive heart failure, coronary artery heart diseases, dementia, psychosis, or other conditions which could influence the clinical trial. * Known history of drug abuse (narcotic (s), cafergot, or others) or drug (botulinum toxin type A) allergy. * Unable to cooperate fill-up TWSTRS, CDIP-58, SF36, and CES-D • Patient who planned to schedule elective surgery during the study. * The used of aminoglycoside antibiotics and curare were not allowed during the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating scale ( TWSTRS)24 weekWSTRS ranged( 0-85 by summation of all 3 sub- scales ) higher represent a worse outcome TWSTRS Sub- scale includes TWSTRS-Total severity scale ( maximum 35 points) TWSTS-Disability scale (maximum 30 points) TWSTS-Pain scale (maximum 20 points)
Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile 58 ( CDIP-58)24 weekCervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 items composed of 8 sub-scale Total score by summation of 8 subscale higher represent a worse outcome Analysis both total score (range 58-290 points) And sub-scale analysis composed of Head and neck symptoms ( 6 items ; 6-30 points) Pain and discomfort ( 5 items ; 5-25 points) Upper limb activity ( 9 items ; 9-45 points) Walking ( 9 items ; 9-45 points) Sleep ( 4 items ; 4-20 points) Annoyance ( 8 items ; 8-40 points) Mood (7 items ; 7-35 points) Psychosocial functioning ( 10 items ; 10-50 points)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparesion the quality of life 36 item ( SF 36)24 weekComparesion the quality of life (SF 36) pre- and post- 12 and 24 week ttreatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) this score has special formula calculation
Depression scale measured by Center of Epidemiologic Study of Depression 20 item ( CES-D 20)24 weekComparesion of CES-D pre- and post- 12 and 24 week treatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) Score ranged from 20-80 points higher represent a worse outcome
Depression scale measured by Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9)24 weekComparesion of PHQ-9 pre- and post- 12 and 24 week treatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) There is the special scale calculation for diagnosis Major depressive disorder, Other depressive disorder and others,higher points /score represent a worse outcome ranged 0-27 points plus 3 points Total summation of 5-9 points indicate Minimal symptoms, 10-14 Minor depression ++ or Dysthymia\* or Major depression, mild , 15-19 points Major depression, moderately severe ≥ 20 Major depression, severe (range PHQ 9 0-27 ) higher represent a worse outcome
Clinical Global Impression of Changed ( CGIC)24 weekComparesion of CGIC pre- and post- 12 and 24 week treatment with 50 unit of Neubotulinum Toxin Type A (Neuronox) and 250 unit of Abobotulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) (range -3 to 3 points: -3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3)

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026