Skip to content

Defining the Electrocardiographic Effect of Propofol on the Ajmaline Provocation Drug Challenge: A Prospective Trial

Defining the Electrocardiographic Effect of Propofol on the Ajmaline Provocation Drug Challenge: A Prospective Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04580992
Enrollment
25
Registered
2020-10-09
Start date
2020-11-16
Completion date
2022-10-31
Last updated
2021-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brugada Syndrome, Channelopathies, Ventricular Fibrillation, Cardiac Death

Brief summary

Background: Brugada Syndrome is an inherited channelopathy associated with risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death in a structurally normal heart. The diagnosis is based on the characteristic electrocardiographic pattern (coved type STsegment elevation, 2mm followed by a negative T-wave in one or more of the right precordial leads V1 to V2), noted spontaneously or upon administration of a sodiumchannel blocker, such as Ajmaline. The majority of adults screened for Brugada Syndrome, undergo the Ajmaline provocation-test awake. Ajmaline is therefore injected continuously, with incremental steps through an intravenous placed catheter, according to cardiological protocols. In a subpopulation of anxious adults, or when another electrophysiological procedure is required at the same time, sedation or general anaesthesia is provided. Similarly, in the paediatric population, it is common practice to perform the challenge test under sedation. Based on the sodium channel blocking properties of propofol, it is not unthinkable that anaesthetic agents might interact with the pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic effects of Ajmaline on the myocardial sodium channels. Existence of such interaction would implicate altered diagnostic value of the Ajmaline-provocation-test for patients that undergo the challenge under general anaesthesia. Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate if the Ajmaline-provocation-test results in altered electrocardiographic effects when performed under general anaesthesia with propofol. Study-design: A prospective observational study. Study population: Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have been diagnosed with Brugada Syndrome, are American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) 2 - 4, older than 18 years and are scheduled for epicardial ablation. Exclusion criteria are known allergy for propofol, a body mass index (BMI) above 35 for female and 42 for male patients, obstetric patients, critical illness, conditions that exclude continuous propofol infusion due to higher risk for propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS), such as mitochondrial disease, fatty acid oxidation disorder, co-enzyme Q deficiency and any other condition that renders the patient unfit for elective surgery. Intervention: This study is prospective, observational. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoints are changes in the ST-, Jp-, QRS-, T(p-e)-segments and T(p-e)/QT -ratio changes during steady-state anaesthesia. The secondary endpoint is the occurrence of de novo arrhythmias. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation: This is an observational study; therefore, the risks associated are no other than those associated with the intervention itself. No additional blood-samples, tests or consults are necessitated during participation; therefore, no extra burden is associated.

Interventions

Ajmaline administration

Sponsors

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>= 18 year * ASA 2, 3, 4 * Epicardial ablation indicated by cardiologist * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* A known allergy to propofol * BMI\>35 for female patients * BMI \> 42 for male patients * Obstetric anaesthesia * Critical Illness * Mitochondrial disease * Fatty acid oxidation disorder * Co-enzyme Q deficiency * Any condition that renders the patient unfit for elective surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ST-, QRS-, Jp-, QT-, QTcB-, QTcFr- and JT-intervalduring the intervention/procedure/surgeryVentricular Arrhythmogenesis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Malignant arrhythmiasintra- or postoperatively (up to 24hours upon discharge from the post anaesthetic care unit)Previously not-known or non-existing ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias resulting in compromising hemodynamic instability detrimentally affecting cardiac output and requiring advanced cardiac life treatment.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactEvelien Vandeurzen
evelien.vandeurzen@uzbrussel.be024749237
Backup ContactDirk De Clippeleir
dirk.declippeleir@uzbrussel.be

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026