Skip to content

Open-Label Surufatinib in European Patients With NET

An Open-Label Phase 2 Study of Surufatinib in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumours in Europe

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04579679
Enrollment
78
Registered
2020-10-08
Start date
2021-08-13
Completion date
2024-10-15
Last updated
2025-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuroendocrine Tumour of the Lung, Neuroendocrine Tumours, Small Intestinal NET

Keywords

VEGF

Brief summary

This is a Phase 2, open-label, multi-centre study of surufatinib in patients with low to intermediate grade (Grade 1 or Grade 2), well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).

Detailed description

This is a Phase 2, open-label, multi-centre study of surufatinib in patients with low- to intermediate-grade (Grade 1 or Grade 2), well-differentiated NETs. The study will enroll 4 cohorts of varying NETs, as follows: * Cohort A - NET of lung origin * Cohort B - NET of small bowel origin * Cohort C - NET of non-small bowel, non-pancreas, and non-lung origin * Cohort D - NET of any origin (DDI substudy) All patients will be treated with oral surufatinib 300 mg QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on Cycle 1 Day 1.

Interventions

DRUGSurufatinib

Surufatinib 300 mg oral once daily

Sponsors

Hutchmed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Has histologically or cytologically documented, locally advanced, or metastatic NET and has progressed on at least 1 prior line of therapy, but no more than 3 therapies; 2. Has radiologic evidence of progressive tumour within 12 months of study enrolment 3. Is willing and able to provide informed consent 4. Is ≥18 years of age 5. Has measurable lesions according to RECIST Version 1.1 6. Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 7. Female patients of childbearing potential and male patients with partners of childbearing potential agree to use a highly effective form(s) of contraception Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Has an AE due to previous anti-tumour therapy that has not recovered to ≤CTCAE Grade 1, except alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity with ≤CTCAE Grade 2 caused by platinum chemotherapy 2. Major surgery within previous 4 weeks or radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to the start of treatment. 3. Prior VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy 4. Uncontrollable hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, despite antihypertensive medication 5. Gastrointestinal disease or condition within 6 months prior to first dose 6. Has a history or presence of a serious haemorrhage (\>30 mL within 3 months) or haemoptysis (\>5 mL blood within 4 weeks) within 6 months of first dose of study drug. 7. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease. 8. Brain metastases and/or spinal cord compression untreated with surgery and/or radiotherapy, and without clinical imaging evidence of stable disease (SD) for 14 days or longer; patients requiring steroids within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment will be excluded. 9. A high risk of bleeding at screening due to tumour invasion into major vessels, such as pulmonary artery, the superior vena cava, or the inferior vena cava, as determined by investigators. 10. Has arterial thrombosis or deep venous thrombosis within 6 months prior to first dosing, or thromboembolic events (including stroke and/or transient ischaemic attack) within 12 months. 11. Has a clinically meaningful ongoing infection (eg, requiring intravenous treatment with anti-infective therapy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Control Rate (DCR)RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 monthsThe DCR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as determined by the Investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentFrom the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 monthsThe QT interval data was corrected for heart rate using 2 correction methods (Fridericia - QTcF and Bazett - QTcB). The treatment period was defined as the period from first administration of study drug up 30 days after last administration. msec=milliseconds, IFB=increase from baseline.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 monthsThe ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR or PR as determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time to Response (TTR)RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 monthsThe TTR was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the date of first documented objective response, either CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) according to RECIST v.1.1 for responders only. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Plasma Concentrations of SurufatinibCohorts A, B and C: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cohort D: Pre-dose and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to obtain plasma concentrations of surufatinib at steady state on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 monthsThe PFS was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the first objective PD as defined by RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever came first. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineBaseline (Day -2) and Cycle 1 Day 15Participants were administered midazolam, fexofenadine and rosuvastatin (as part of the drug cocktail) as a single dose on Day -2 (without surufatinib) and on Cycle 1 Day 15 (with surufatinib). Separate blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of each probe substrate and surufatinib. Probe substrate of midazolam was CYP3A4, fexofenadine was P-gp and rosuvastatin was BCRP. Ratio of LS Mean for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) are presented as Cycle 1 Day 15/Day -2.
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 monthsAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the drug. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was any important medical event. TEAEs were defined as any AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration date of study drug and no later than 30 (+7) days after the last administration date of study drug or initiation of new anti-tumor therapy (whichever occurred first).
Duration of Response (DOR)RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 monthsThe DoR was defined as the time from the first time that the objective response reached CR or PR, whichever came first (and later confirmed), until the occurrence of PD or death. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase 2, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic low to intermediate grade (Grade 1 or Grade 2), well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Pre-assignment details

The study enrolled patients in 4 cohorts of varying NETs as follows: * Cohort A - NET of lung origin (NET, lung) * Cohort B - NET of small bowel origin (NET, small bowel) * Cohort C - NET of non-small bowel, non-pancreas, and non-lung origin (NET, other) * Cohort D - NET of any origin/drug-drug interaction sub-study (NET, any) The study was terminated early based on the strategic re-evaluation of the clinical development program for surufatinib and not due to any safety concerns.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A (NET, Lung)
Patients with NET of lung origin received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on C1D1 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up.
20
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)
Patients with NET of small bowel origin received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on C1D1 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up.
32
Cohort C (NET, Other)
Patients with NET of non-small bowel, non-pancreas, and non-lung origin received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on C1D1 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up.
20
Cohort D (NET, Any)
Patients with NET of any origin received a single dose of drug cocktail (midazolam 2.5 mg, fexofenadine 30 mg and rosuvastatin 10 mg) on Day -2 followed by surufatinib 300 mg orally QD from C1D1 to C1D14. On C1D15, a single dose of surufatinib 300 mg and a single dose of drug cocktail as above was administered. Patients received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD from C1D16 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up.
6
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0400
Overall StudyDeath2220
Overall StudyDisease Progression91370
Overall StudyNew Antitumor Therapy6470
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0010
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor2710
Overall StudyWithdrawal of Consent1124

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Cohort C (NET, Other)Cohort D (NET, Any)Total
Age, Continuous63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.77
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.52
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.37
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants26 Participants13 Participants6 Participants60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants7 Participants0 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
4 Participants1 Participants7 Participants0 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
15 Participants28 Participants13 Participants3 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants20 Participants9 Participants4 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants12 Participants11 Participants2 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 202 / 322 / 200 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2032 / 3220 / 206 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 2012 / 328 / 202 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

The DCR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as determined by the Investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Disease Control Rate (DCR)95.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Disease Control Rate (DCR)90.3 percentage of participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Disease Control Rate (DCR)89.5 percentage of participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Disease Control Rate (DCR)100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline

Participants were administered midazolam, fexofenadine and rosuvastatin (as part of the drug cocktail) as a single dose on Day -2 (without surufatinib) and on Cycle 1 Day 15 (with surufatinib). Separate blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of each probe substrate and surufatinib. Probe substrate of midazolam was CYP3A4, fexofenadine was P-gp and rosuvastatin was BCRP. Ratio of LS Mean for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) are presented as Cycle 1 Day 15/Day -2.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -2) and Cycle 1 Day 15

Population: The PK evaluable population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug and had sufficient concentration data to derive at least 1 PK parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineFexofenadine (P-gp substrate), Cmax2.03 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineFexofenadine (P-gp substrate), AUC0-t2.12 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineFexofenadine (P-gp substrate), AUC0-inf2.14 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineRosuvastatin (BCRP substrate), AUC0-inf2.23 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineMidazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), Cmax1.69 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineMidazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), AUC0-t1.70 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineMidazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), AUC0-inf1.71 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineRosuvastatin (BCRP substrate), Cmax2.23 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to BaselineRosuvastatin (BCRP substrate), AUC0-t2.13 Ratio of geometric LS mean
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

The DoR was defined as the time from the first time that the objective response reached CR or PR, whichever came first (and later confirmed), until the occurrence of PD or death. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. Only those patients who achieved CR or PR (responders) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Duration of Response (DOR)16.9 months
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Duration of Response (DOR)15.4 months
Cohort C (NET, Other)Duration of Response (DOR)5.6 months
Cohort D (NET, Any)Duration of Response (DOR)NA months
Secondary

Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment

The QT interval data was corrected for heart rate using 2 correction methods (Fridericia - QTcF and Bazett - QTcB). The treatment period was defined as the period from first administration of study drug up 30 days after last administration. msec=milliseconds, IFB=increase from baseline.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 months

Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib. Only those patients with data collected are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec0 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec3 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec4 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec0 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec0 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >60 msec1 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec2 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >60 msec2 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec7 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec1 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec2 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >60 msec2 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec2 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec6 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec4 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >500 msec1 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >500 msec0 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >60 msec0 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec3 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >500 msec1 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec1 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec0 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec4 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec0 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >60 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec0 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >500 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >60 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec4 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >500 msec1 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During TreatmentQTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the drug. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was any important medical event. TEAEs were defined as any AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration date of study drug and no later than 30 (+7) days after the last administration date of study drug or initiation of new anti-tumor therapy (whichever occurred first).

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 months

Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs20 Participants
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs4 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs12 Participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs32 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs8 Participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs20 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAEs2 Participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAEs6 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR or PR as determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Objective Response Rate (ORR)15.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Objective Response Rate (ORR)16.1 percentage of participants
Cohort C (NET, Other)Objective Response Rate (ORR)5.3 percentage of participants
Cohort D (NET, Any)Objective Response Rate (ORR)20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to obtain plasma concentrations of surufatinib at steady state on Cycle 1 Day 15.

Time frame: Cohorts A, B and C: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cohort D: Pre-dose and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug and had at least 1 measurable plasma concentration data point for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol violations or events with potential to affect the PK concentration. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib1 hour post-dose130.456 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 118.3
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Plasma Concentrations of SurufatinibPre-dose73.123 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.1
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib2 hours post-dose234.498 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 122.1
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib4 hours post-dose293.236 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 85.6
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib3 hours post-dose287.237 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 95
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib2 hours post-dose174.799 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 138.1
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib1 hour post-dose96.163 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 115.2
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Plasma Concentrations of SurufatinibPre-dose57.593 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 136.8
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib4 hours post-dose268.619 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 65.9
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib3 hours post-dose250.348 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 101.8
Cohort C (NET, Other)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib1 hour post-dose101.464 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 125.6
Cohort C (NET, Other)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib2 hours post-dose194.654 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 80.5
Cohort C (NET, Other)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib4 hours post-dose232.657 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.6
Cohort C (NET, Other)Plasma Concentrations of SurufatinibPre-dose49.258 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7
Cohort C (NET, Other)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib3 hours post-dose245.379 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.1
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib2 hours post-dose321.942 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 99.9
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib30 minutes post-dose50.439 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 190.5
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of SurufatinibPre-dose28.913 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 130.5
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib10 hours post-dose174.079 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 84.1
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib3 hours post-dose477.653 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 118.6
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib8 hours post-dose202.345 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 102.7
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib6 hours post-dose280.691 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 105.2
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib4 hours post-dose389.597 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 102.8
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib5 hours post-dose357.045 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 105.4
Cohort D (NET, Any)Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib1 hour post-dose129.719 nanogram/milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 303.6
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the first objective PD as defined by RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever came first. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months

Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Progression-Free Survival (PFS)10.2 months
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Progression-Free Survival (PFS)19.2 months
Cohort C (NET, Other)Progression-Free Survival (PFS)11.4 months
Cohort D (NET, Any)Progression-Free Survival (PFS)9.8 months
Secondary

Time to Response (TTR)

The TTR was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the date of first documented objective response, either CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) according to RECIST v.1.1 for responders only. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months

Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. Only those patients who achieved CR or PR (responders) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort A (NET, Lung)Time to Response (TTR)2.1 months
Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel)Time to Response (TTR)3.7 months
Cohort C (NET, Other)Time to Response (TTR)11.1 months
Cohort D (NET, Any)Time to Response (TTR)13.6 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026