Neuroendocrine Tumour of the Lung, Neuroendocrine Tumours, Small Intestinal NET
Conditions
Keywords
VEGF
Brief summary
This is a Phase 2, open-label, multi-centre study of surufatinib in patients with low to intermediate grade (Grade 1 or Grade 2), well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs).
Detailed description
This is a Phase 2, open-label, multi-centre study of surufatinib in patients with low- to intermediate-grade (Grade 1 or Grade 2), well-differentiated NETs. The study will enroll 4 cohorts of varying NETs, as follows: * Cohort A - NET of lung origin * Cohort B - NET of small bowel origin * Cohort C - NET of non-small bowel, non-pancreas, and non-lung origin * Cohort D - NET of any origin (DDI substudy) All patients will be treated with oral surufatinib 300 mg QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on Cycle 1 Day 1.
Interventions
Surufatinib 300 mg oral once daily
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Has histologically or cytologically documented, locally advanced, or metastatic NET and has progressed on at least 1 prior line of therapy, but no more than 3 therapies; 2. Has radiologic evidence of progressive tumour within 12 months of study enrolment 3. Is willing and able to provide informed consent 4. Is ≥18 years of age 5. Has measurable lesions according to RECIST Version 1.1 6. Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 7. Female patients of childbearing potential and male patients with partners of childbearing potential agree to use a highly effective form(s) of contraception Key
Exclusion criteria
1. Has an AE due to previous anti-tumour therapy that has not recovered to ≤CTCAE Grade 1, except alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity with ≤CTCAE Grade 2 caused by platinum chemotherapy 2. Major surgery within previous 4 weeks or radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to the start of treatment. 3. Prior VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy 4. Uncontrollable hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, despite antihypertensive medication 5. Gastrointestinal disease or condition within 6 months prior to first dose 6. Has a history or presence of a serious haemorrhage (\>30 mL within 3 months) or haemoptysis (\>5 mL blood within 4 weeks) within 6 months of first dose of study drug. 7. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease. 8. Brain metastases and/or spinal cord compression untreated with surgery and/or radiotherapy, and without clinical imaging evidence of stable disease (SD) for 14 days or longer; patients requiring steroids within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment will be excluded. 9. A high risk of bleeding at screening due to tumour invasion into major vessels, such as pulmonary artery, the superior vena cava, or the inferior vena cava, as determined by investigators. 10. Has arterial thrombosis or deep venous thrombosis within 6 months prior to first dosing, or thromboembolic events (including stroke and/or transient ischaemic attack) within 12 months. 11. Has a clinically meaningful ongoing infection (eg, requiring intravenous treatment with anti-infective therapy)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) | RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months | The DCR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as determined by the Investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 months | The QT interval data was corrected for heart rate using 2 correction methods (Fridericia - QTcF and Bazett - QTcB). The treatment period was defined as the period from first administration of study drug up 30 days after last administration. msec=milliseconds, IFB=increase from baseline. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months | The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR or PR as determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
| Time to Response (TTR) | RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months | The TTR was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the date of first documented objective response, either CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) according to RECIST v.1.1 for responders only. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
| Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | Cohorts A, B and C: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cohort D: Pre-dose and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 | Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to obtain plasma concentrations of surufatinib at steady state on Cycle 1 Day 15. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months | The PFS was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the first objective PD as defined by RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever came first. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. |
| Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Baseline (Day -2) and Cycle 1 Day 15 | Participants were administered midazolam, fexofenadine and rosuvastatin (as part of the drug cocktail) as a single dose on Day -2 (without surufatinib) and on Cycle 1 Day 15 (with surufatinib). Separate blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of each probe substrate and surufatinib. Probe substrate of midazolam was CYP3A4, fexofenadine was P-gp and rosuvastatin was BCRP. Ratio of LS Mean for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) are presented as Cycle 1 Day 15/Day -2. |
| Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 months | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the drug. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was any important medical event. TEAEs were defined as any AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration date of study drug and no later than 30 (+7) days after the last administration date of study drug or initiation of new anti-tumor therapy (whichever occurred first). |
| Duration of Response (DOR) | RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months | The DoR was defined as the time from the first time that the objective response reached CR or PR, whichever came first (and later confirmed), until the occurrence of PD or death. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. |
Countries
France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This Phase 2, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in patients with locally advanced or metastatic low to intermediate grade (Grade 1 or Grade 2), well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
Pre-assignment details
The study enrolled patients in 4 cohorts of varying NETs as follows: * Cohort A - NET of lung origin (NET, lung) * Cohort B - NET of small bowel origin (NET, small bowel) * Cohort C - NET of non-small bowel, non-pancreas, and non-lung origin (NET, other) * Cohort D - NET of any origin/drug-drug interaction sub-study (NET, any) The study was terminated early based on the strategic re-evaluation of the clinical development program for surufatinib and not due to any safety concerns.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) Patients with NET of lung origin received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on C1D1 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up. | 20 |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) Patients with NET of small bowel origin received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on C1D1 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up. | 32 |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) Patients with NET of non-small bowel, non-pancreas, and non-lung origin received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD in treatment cycles of 28 days starting on C1D1 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up. | 20 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) Patients with NET of any origin received a single dose of drug cocktail (midazolam 2.5 mg, fexofenadine 30 mg and rosuvastatin 10 mg) on Day -2 followed by surufatinib 300 mg orally QD from C1D1 to C1D14. On C1D15, a single dose of surufatinib 300 mg and a single dose of drug cocktail as above was administered. Patients received surufatinib 300 mg orally QD from C1D16 until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up. | 6 |
| Total | 78 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Death | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 9 | 13 | 7 | 0 |
| Overall Study | New Antitumor Therapy | 6 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal of Consent | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Cohort C (NET, Other) | Cohort D (NET, Any) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.77 | 62.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44 | 57.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.52 | 63.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 | 61.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.37 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 15 Participants | 26 Participants | 13 Participants | 6 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Reported | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 15 Participants | 28 Participants | 13 Participants | 3 Participants | 59 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 20 Participants | 9 Participants | 4 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 2 Participants | 38 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 20 | 2 / 32 | 2 / 20 | 0 / 6 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 20 / 20 | 32 / 32 | 20 / 20 | 6 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 20 | 12 / 32 | 8 / 20 | 2 / 6 |
Outcome results
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
The DCR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as determined by the Investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v)1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months
Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 95.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 90.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 100 percentage of participants |
Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline
Participants were administered midazolam, fexofenadine and rosuvastatin (as part of the drug cocktail) as a single dose on Day -2 (without surufatinib) and on Cycle 1 Day 15 (with surufatinib). Separate blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma concentrations of each probe substrate and surufatinib. Probe substrate of midazolam was CYP3A4, fexofenadine was P-gp and rosuvastatin was BCRP. Ratio of LS Mean for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time of last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) are presented as Cycle 1 Day 15/Day -2.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -2) and Cycle 1 Day 15
Population: The PK evaluable population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug and had sufficient concentration data to derive at least 1 PK parameter.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Fexofenadine (P-gp substrate), Cmax | 2.03 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Fexofenadine (P-gp substrate), AUC0-t | 2.12 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Fexofenadine (P-gp substrate), AUC0-inf | 2.14 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Rosuvastatin (BCRP substrate), AUC0-inf | 2.23 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), Cmax | 1.69 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), AUC0-t | 1.70 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate), AUC0-inf | 1.71 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Rosuvastatin (BCRP substrate), Cmax | 2.23 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Cohort D: Geometric Least Squares (LS) Mean Ratio of Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4), P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) Substrates at Cycle 1 Day 15 to Baseline | Rosuvastatin (BCRP substrate), AUC0-t | 2.13 Ratio of geometric LS mean |
Duration of Response (DOR)
The DoR was defined as the time from the first time that the objective response reached CR or PR, whichever came first (and later confirmed), until the occurrence of PD or death. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months
Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. Only those patients who achieved CR or PR (responders) were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Duration of Response (DOR) | 16.9 months |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Duration of Response (DOR) | 15.4 months |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Duration of Response (DOR) | 5.6 months |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Duration of Response (DOR) | NA months |
Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment
The QT interval data was corrected for heart rate using 2 correction methods (Fridericia - QTcF and Bazett - QTcB). The treatment period was defined as the period from first administration of study drug up 30 days after last administration. msec=milliseconds, IFB=increase from baseline.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 months
Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib. Only those patients with data collected are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >60 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 4 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >60 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >60 msec | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >60 msec | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 6 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >60 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >60 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >60 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >480 msec to <=500 msec | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >60 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: IFB >30 msec to <=60 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcB: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 4 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >500 msec | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Potentially Clinically Significant Corrected QT Interval (QTc) During Treatment | QTcF: >450 msec to <=480 msec | 2 Participants |
Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered related to the drug. An SAE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was any important medical event. TEAEs were defined as any AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration date of study drug and no later than 30 (+7) days after the last administration date of study drug or initiation of new anti-tumor therapy (whichever occurred first).
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug, approximately 33 months
Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 20 Participants |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 12 Participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 32 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 8 Participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 20 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAEs | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Number of Patients With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAEs | 6 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR or PR as determined by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months
Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 15.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 16.1 percentage of participants |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to obtain plasma concentrations of surufatinib at steady state on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Time frame: Cohorts A, B and C: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 3, 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cohort D: Pre-dose and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug and had at least 1 measurable plasma concentration data point for at least 1 PK analyte without protocol violations or events with potential to affect the PK concentration. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 1 hour post-dose | 130.456 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 118.3 |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | Pre-dose | 73.123 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 70.1 |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 2 hours post-dose | 234.498 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 122.1 |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 4 hours post-dose | 293.236 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 85.6 |
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 3 hours post-dose | 287.237 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 95 |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 2 hours post-dose | 174.799 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 138.1 |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 1 hour post-dose | 96.163 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 115.2 |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | Pre-dose | 57.593 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 136.8 |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 4 hours post-dose | 268.619 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 65.9 |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 3 hours post-dose | 250.348 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101.8 |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 1 hour post-dose | 101.464 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 125.6 |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 2 hours post-dose | 194.654 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.5 |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 4 hours post-dose | 232.657 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.6 |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | Pre-dose | 49.258 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.7 |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 3 hours post-dose | 245.379 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 55.1 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 2 hours post-dose | 321.942 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 99.9 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 30 minutes post-dose | 50.439 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 190.5 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | Pre-dose | 28.913 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 130.5 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 10 hours post-dose | 174.079 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 84.1 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 3 hours post-dose | 477.653 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 118.6 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 8 hours post-dose | 202.345 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 102.7 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 6 hours post-dose | 280.691 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.2 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 4 hours post-dose | 389.597 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 102.8 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 5 hours post-dose | 357.045 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.4 |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Plasma Concentrations of Surufatinib | 1 hour post-dose | 129.719 nanogram/milliliter | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 303.6 |
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
The PFS was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the first objective PD as defined by RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever came first. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months
Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 10.2 months |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 19.2 months |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 11.4 months |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 9.8 months |
Time to Response (TTR)
The TTR was defined as the time from the start of study drug until the date of first documented objective response, either CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) according to RECIST v.1.1 for responders only. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: RECIST assessments performed at screening (within 28 days before start of study drug), every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks from C1D1, then every 12 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of disease progression, up to approximately 36 months
Population: The efficacy analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of surufatinib and had at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment. Only those patients who achieved CR or PR (responders) were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A (NET, Lung) | Time to Response (TTR) | 2.1 months |
| Cohort B (NET, Small Bowel) | Time to Response (TTR) | 3.7 months |
| Cohort C (NET, Other) | Time to Response (TTR) | 11.1 months |
| Cohort D (NET, Any) | Time to Response (TTR) | 13.6 months |