Hearing Loss
Conditions
Brief summary
Participants will perform two different listening tasks: (1) listening to, and repeating back, sentence lists presented in noise, and (2) Subjective rating of effort & performance following each condition. During this study, continuous, non-invasive physiological measurements (skin conductance, changes in pupil dilation) will be recorded from participants. Using this paradigm we will be assessing the effect of different hearing aid processing algorithms on listening effort. The study takes the form of a one factor (algorithm), within-subjects design. Each participant performs the Speech perception task with each algorithm (reference, noise reduction I, noise reduction II, noise reduction III), at two individualized signal-to-noise ratios (SRT90 and SRT50). Additionally subjective performance ratings in real-life will be collected.
Interventions
Each participant will be fitted with noise reduction disabled. Disabled means that no sound processing algorithm that removes noise from the speech signal is active.
Each participant will be fitted with the noise reduction program on the same hearing aid. The principle of the noise reduction algorithm is to remove noise from a speech signal with the aim of improving the speech intelligibility and comfort.
Each participant will be fitted with a second noise reduction program on the same hearing aid. The parameterization of this NR algorithm differs from that in NR(1).
Each participant will be fitted with a third noise reduction program on the same hearing aid. The parameterization of this NR algorithm differs from that in NR(1) and NR(2).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Healthy outer ear (without previous surgical procedures) * Ability to fill in a questionnaire conscientiously * Informed Consent as documented by signature * Minimum 1 year hearing aid experience * Moderate-Severe (N3-N5) hearing loss or Normal Hearing
Exclusion criteria
* Contraindications to the MD in this study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product * Limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments * Inability to produce a reliable hearing test result * Massively limited dexterity * Known psychological problems * Known central hearing disorders
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance | 6 weeks | Skin conductance will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task. Analyses will be carried out on the skin conductance response recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus. It is planned to analyze event-related skin conductance response amplitudes & latencies (micro-Siemens & milliseconds). |
| Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs) | 6 weeks | Pupil dilations will be recorded from the participant during the performance of the auditory tasks. Analyses will be carried out relative to the pre-trial baseline (measured one second prior to the onset of the stimulus), in order to account for differences in baseline physiological activity. It is planned to analyze event-related-pupil-dilations. We use the unit: pixels. The size of a pixel in 1mm\^2 is relative to the distance between the eye and the camera. Even though participants heads were placed on a chin rest that was always the same distance from the camera, the distance between the individual eye and the camera can still be different due to differences in participants' anatomies. Thus, pupil dilation are often reported relative to an individuals' baseline, for example as percent change relative to the baseline. Therefore, we use the unit: pixels, as the use of mm\^2 may be inaccurate. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oldenburg Sentence Test | 6 weeks | Words recalled correctly: words repeated back by participants are logged and the percentage of words recalled correctly calculated. |
| Sound Quality Ratings | 6 weeks | The sound quality ratings will be assessed with the aid of a Multi-Stimulus Test. The data, serving as secondary outcome measure, are collected in the laboratory. The scale ranges from 0 very bad to 6 very good in increments of 1. Individual sound quality rating from participants are averaged over 3 different acoustic scenes for each hearing aid program. |
| Spectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM) | 6 weeks | Stimuli which contain simultaneous frequency and amplitude modulations of a wide-band noise carrier are presented to the participants. The depth of the modulations is systematically varied and the individual modulation detection thresholds are recorded as a broadband decibel (dB) value. For each participant 4 measures were made and averaged to give a mean STM threshold. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Skin Temperature Data | 6 weeks | Skin temperature will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a small thermometer attached to the outside of the little finger (non-dominant hand). This data will only be used to control for changes in temperature which may influence skin conductance measurements. |
| Non-verbal Trail Making Test A & B | 2 weeks | The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible according to a given order. In version A the order is given by increasing digit number (i.e. 1-25) while in version B the order is given by alternating digits and letters (i.e. 1-A-2-B-3-C…). The data, serving as an outcome measure, are time-to-complete the set in seconds. |
| Acoustic Reflex Thresholds | 3 weeks | Tympanometry will be used to assess the mobility of the eardrum, prior to recording Acoustic Reflex Thresholds (ARTs). Compliance \[ml\], Middle Ear Pressure \[daPa\] and ear canal volume \[ml\] will be recorded and checked that they fall within normal limits. Where this is the case, ARTs will be measured using 0.5, 1 & 2 kHz stimulus tones ipsi- and contralaterally for each ear. The resulting outcome measure will be the threshold \[dB\] required at each frequency and ear arrangement for a stapedial reflex to be present. |
| Digit-Span Test Forward (FW) & Backward (BW) | 2 weeks | The digit-span task is used to measure working memory's number storage capacity. Participants will see a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. The participant's span is the longest number of sequential digits that can accurately be remembered, which means that the participant recalls two sequences out of a maximum of three sequences correct. Digit-span tasks can be given forwards or backwards, meaning that once the sequence is presented, the participant is asked to either recall the sentence in normal or reverse order. |
| Go/No-go Task | 6 weeks | The Go/No-go task measures inhibitory control. Participants are asked to respond to a Go stimulus as fast as possible but not respond to a No-go stimulus. Go stimuli are presented at a rate much higher than the No-go stimuli to elicit prepotent motor activity. The outcome measure of this task is the number of commission errors (i.e. responding to a No-go stimuli) a participant commits as a measure of their ability to stop prepotent motor activity. |
| Blood Volume Pulse | 6 weeks | Blood volume pulse will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task (non-invasively with a photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor). Analyses will be carried out on the data recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus (relative to baseline activity). It is planned to analyze event-related changes in pulse rate and amplitude (beats per minute). |
| Respiration Data | 6 weeks | Respiration rates will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a belt placed under the ribcage. This data will only be used to control for changes in breathing patterns which may influence skin conductance measurements. |
Countries
Switzerland
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Study Cohort This study was a crossover design, therefore there was only a single study group.
This group undertook measures under each of the study conditions. | 19 |
| Total | 19 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing Aid With NR (1) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
| Hearing Aid With NR (2) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
| Hearing Aid With NR (4) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
| Hearing Aid Without NR Enabled (0) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Study Cohort | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 74.95 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.42 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 19 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 19 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 19 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 19 |
Outcome results
Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs)
Pupil dilations will be recorded from the participant during the performance of the auditory tasks. Analyses will be carried out relative to the pre-trial baseline (measured one second prior to the onset of the stimulus), in order to account for differences in baseline physiological activity. It is planned to analyze event-related-pupil-dilations. We use the unit: pixels. The size of a pixel in 1mm\^2 is relative to the distance between the eye and the camera. Even though participants heads were placed on a chin rest that was always the same distance from the camera, the distance between the individual eye and the camera can still be different due to differences in participants' anatomies. Thus, pupil dilation are often reported relative to an individuals' baseline, for example as percent change relative to the baseline. Therefore, we use the unit: pixels, as the use of mm\^2 may be inaccurate.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: The data from some participants had to be excluded from the analysis. Due to the noisy nature of physiological data, in some cases we were unable to collect enough valid, artefact-free data to analyse. Where this was the case, we discounted the participant from analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing Aid Without NR(0) Enabled | Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs) | 217.713 pixels |
| Hearing Aid With NR (1) | Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs) | 217.301 pixels |
| Hearing Aid With NR(2) | Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs) | 158.732 pixels |
| Hearing Aid With NR(3) | Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs) | 186.526 pixels |
Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance
Skin conductance will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task. Analyses will be carried out on the skin conductance response recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus. It is planned to analyze event-related skin conductance response amplitudes & latencies (micro-Siemens & milliseconds).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: The data from some participants had to be excluded from the analysis. Due to the noisy nature of physiological data, in some cases we were unable to collect enough valid, artefact-free data to analyse. Where this was the case, we discounted the participant from analyses. As we only contrasted NR(0) vs NR(1) and NR(2) vs NR(3) (and collected respective data at different study appointments), there is a slight discrepancy in the number of participants analysed for these study arms.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing Aid Without NR(0) Enabled | Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance | 0.221 micro Siemens |
| Hearing Aid With NR (1) | Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance | 0.189 micro Siemens |
| Hearing Aid With NR(2) | Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance | 0.147 micro Siemens |
| Hearing Aid With NR(3) | Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance | 0.126 micro Siemens |
Oldenburg Sentence Test
Words recalled correctly: words repeated back by participants are logged and the percentage of words recalled correctly calculated.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: By the time this outcome measure was performed, 1 of the original participants had withdrawn from the study.~Therefore, data for 18 participants was analysed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hearing Aid Without NR(0) Enabled | Oldenburg Sentence Test | 92.778 Percentage of correct words | Standard Deviation 3.296 |
| Hearing Aid With NR (1) | Oldenburg Sentence Test | 88.611 Percentage of correct words | Standard Deviation 6.709 |
| Hearing Aid With NR(2) | Oldenburg Sentence Test | 96.157 Percentage of correct words | Standard Deviation 2.271 |
| Hearing Aid With NR(3) | Oldenburg Sentence Test | 94.398 Percentage of correct words | Standard Deviation 4.607 |
Sound Quality Ratings
The sound quality ratings will be assessed with the aid of a Multi-Stimulus Test. The data, serving as secondary outcome measure, are collected in the laboratory. The scale ranges from 0 very bad to 6 very good in increments of 1. Individual sound quality rating from participants are averaged over 3 different acoustic scenes for each hearing aid program.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: By the time this outcome measure was performed, 2 of the original participants had withdrawn from the study.~Therefore, data for 17 participants was analysed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hearing Aid Without NR(0) Enabled | Sound Quality Ratings | 3.275 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.263 |
| Hearing Aid With NR (1) | Sound Quality Ratings | 3.230 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.107 |
| Hearing Aid With NR(2) | Sound Quality Ratings | 3.054 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.208 |
| Hearing Aid With NR(3) | Sound Quality Ratings | 3.157 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.136 |
Spectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM)
Stimuli which contain simultaneous frequency and amplitude modulations of a wide-band noise carrier are presented to the participants. The depth of the modulations is systematically varied and the individual modulation detection thresholds are recorded as a broadband decibel (dB) value. For each participant 4 measures were made and averaged to give a mean STM threshold.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: By the time this outcome measure was performed, 2 of the original participants had withdrawn from the study.~Therefore, 17 participants had measurements for this outcome measure made. For 5 participants it was not possible to measure an STM threshold reliably at all test occasions.~Where this was the case, these participants were excluded from analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hearing Aid Without NR(0) Enabled | Spectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM) | -8.181 decibel | Standard Error 0.617 |
Acoustic Reflex Thresholds
Tympanometry will be used to assess the mobility of the eardrum, prior to recording Acoustic Reflex Thresholds (ARTs). Compliance \[ml\], Middle Ear Pressure \[daPa\] and ear canal volume \[ml\] will be recorded and checked that they fall within normal limits. Where this is the case, ARTs will be measured using 0.5, 1 & 2 kHz stimulus tones ipsi- and contralaterally for each ear. The resulting outcome measure will be the threshold \[dB\] required at each frequency and ear arrangement for a stapedial reflex to be present.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Blood Volume Pulse
Blood volume pulse will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task (non-invasively with a photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor). Analyses will be carried out on the data recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus (relative to baseline activity). It is planned to analyze event-related changes in pulse rate and amplitude (beats per minute).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Digit-Span Test Forward (FW) & Backward (BW)
The digit-span task is used to measure working memory's number storage capacity. Participants will see a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. The participant's span is the longest number of sequential digits that can accurately be remembered, which means that the participant recalls two sequences out of a maximum of three sequences correct. Digit-span tasks can be given forwards or backwards, meaning that once the sequence is presented, the participant is asked to either recall the sentence in normal or reverse order.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Go/No-go Task
The Go/No-go task measures inhibitory control. Participants are asked to respond to a Go stimulus as fast as possible but not respond to a No-go stimulus. Go stimuli are presented at a rate much higher than the No-go stimuli to elicit prepotent motor activity. The outcome measure of this task is the number of commission errors (i.e. responding to a No-go stimuli) a participant commits as a measure of their ability to stop prepotent motor activity.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Non-verbal Trail Making Test A & B
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible according to a given order. In version A the order is given by increasing digit number (i.e. 1-25) while in version B the order is given by alternating digits and letters (i.e. 1-A-2-B-3-C…). The data, serving as an outcome measure, are time-to-complete the set in seconds.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Respiration Data
Respiration rates will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a belt placed under the ribcage. This data will only be used to control for changes in breathing patterns which may influence skin conductance measurements.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Skin Temperature Data
Skin temperature will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a small thermometer attached to the outside of the little finger (non-dominant hand). This data will only be used to control for changes in temperature which may influence skin conductance measurements.
Time frame: 6 weeks