Skip to content

A Study of Fruquintinib in Combination With Tislelizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors

An Open-Label, Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Fruquintinib in Combination With Tislelizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04577963
Enrollment
52
Registered
2020-10-08
Start date
2021-08-09
Completion date
2024-06-18
Last updated
2025-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Solid Tumor, Unspecified, Adult, Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast cancer, Triple negative, Her2-, HR-, ER-, PR-, Her2 negative, HR negative, ER negative, PR negative, TNBC, VEGF, VEGFR, Endometrial cancer, Colon, Rectal, mCRC, Colorectal

Brief summary

This is an open-label, multi-center, non-randomized, Phase 1b/2 study to assess the safety and efficacy of fruquintinib in combination with tislelizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. This study will be conducted in 2 parts; a Safety Lead-in Phase (Part 1) and a Dose Expansion Phase (Part 2). The Safety Lead-in Phase, open to any-comer solid tumors, will determine the RP2D. The RP2D will be administered to 3 cohorts of patients in the Dose Expansion Phase. * Cohort A: Advanced or Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (IO-treated) * Cohort B: Advanced or Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (IO-Naïve) * Cohort C: Advanced or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer (EC) (IO-Naïve) * Cohort D: Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) (IO-Naïve)

Interventions

DRUGFruquintinib

Oral VEGFR inhibitor

DRUGTislelizumab

PD-1 inhibitor

Sponsors

BeiGene
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Hutchmed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Willing and able to provide informed consent signed by study patient or legally acceptable representative, as specified by health authorities and institutional guidelines; 2. Age ≥18 years; 3. Histologically or cytologically documented, advanced or metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer, histologically or cytologically documented, advanced or metastatic endometrial carcinoma, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic, unresectable adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum. 4. Tumor tissue (archival or fresh tumor tissues as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks or approximately 15 unstained slides) for central laboratory assessment. 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤1. 6. At least 1 measurable lesion as defined by RECIST v1.1.

Exclusion criteria

1. Has at screening any central nervous system metastasis and/or leptomeningeal disease. 2. Except for Cohort A, Prior therapy targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1 or programmed cell death protein ligand-2 (PD-L2) or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways. 3. Prior treatment with a VEGFR-TKI or anti-VEGFR antibody (eg, ramucirumab). 4. Except for Cohort D, prior treatment with an anti-VEGFR antibody (eg, bevacizumab). 5. Tumor tissue (archival or fresh tumor tissues as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks or approximately 15 unstained slides) for central laboratory assessment. 6. Active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse, or history of interstitial lung disease, noninfectious pneumonitis, or uncontrolled lung diseases including but not limited to pulmonary fibrosis, acute lung diseases, etc. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(AEs) v5.0, DLT was defined as any 1 of following toxicities during DLT assessment window and considered by Investigator to be related to 1 or more study treatments:a)Hematologic: grade(G) 4 neutropenia lasting \>7 days, G ≥3 febrile neutropenia, G 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding, G 4 thrombocytopenia, G ≥4 anemia.b) Non-hematologic:all G ≥3 non-hematologic toxicities except:G 3 endocrinopathy controlled by hormonal replacement with no hospitalization and resolved to G ≤1 within 7 days, G 3 nausea/vomiting or diarrhea for \<72 hours with antiemetic and supportive care, G 3 fatigue for \<1 week, G ≥3 electrolyte abnormality lasting up to 72 hours and resolving with treatment, G 3 rash returning to baseline or G ≤1 within 7 days with treatment,G ≥3 amylase or lipase elevation without symptoms of pancreatitis,G 3 hypertension returning to baseline or G≤1 within 7 days with treatment.
Part 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Fruquintinib in Combination With TislelizumabFrom the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)The RP2D of fruquintinib in combination with tislelizumab based on the safety and tolerability assessments in Part 1 patients.
Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsThe ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsThe CBR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR, PR, or durable SD (i.e., lasting for at least 6 months) as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. Durable SD was SD for at least 6 months. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response (DoR)Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsThe DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of PR or CR by RECIST v1.1, whichever came first until PD or death. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to date of death due to any cause, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsThe OS was defined as the time from start of study treatment until the date of death due to any cause.
Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Pre-dose on Days 1, 8, 15, 21 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 7, 13; 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 21 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of fruquintinib and metabolite M11.
Part 1: Objective Response RateTumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsThe ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed BOR of CR or PR as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabFrom the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of treatment, up to approximately 17 months for Part 1 and 20 months for Part 2Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to detect ADAs to tislelizumab. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA negative at baseline and ADA positive post-baseline. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as ADA positive at baseline that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following treatment administration.
Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationFrom the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 21 monthsAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the treatment. An AE was considered serious if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, was an abnormal pregnancy outcome in a child born to a female patient/female partner of a male patient exposed to study treatment or was an important medical event. TEAEs were AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) ExpressionBaseline (Day 1) up to end of treatment, up to approximately 20 monthsExpression of PD-L1 biomarker was planned to be assessed in tumor tissues of the patients. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to the first administration of any study treatment (whichever occurred first), including scheduled and unscheduled visits, unless otherwise specified.
Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabPre-infusion on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 7, 13; at end of infusion on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 4; on Days 8, 15, and 21 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to determine serum concentrations of tislelizumab.
Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsPFS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment until the first radiographic documentation of objective progression as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 monthsThe DCR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 7 weeks as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This phase 1b/2, 2-part, open-label study was conducted in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a safety lead-in phase (Part 1) and a dose expansion phase (Part 2). A total of 52 patients were enrolled in this study (6 patients received study treatment in Part 1 and 46 patients received study treatment in Part 2). The study was terminated early based upon the strategic evaluation of clinical development of fruquintinib in the United States. This change was not based on any concern for patient safety or efficacy relative to fruquintinib and/or tislelizumab treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 2: Cohort A: TNBC (IO-Treated in the Metastatic Setting)
Patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC including those with ER or PGR low positive disease who had progressed on at least 1 line, but no more than 3 lines, of cytotoxic therapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting and had progressed on prior immunotherapy in the metastatic setting were included in this cohort. Patients received fruquintinib 5 mg orally QD for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off in every 4-week cycle in combination with tislelizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q4W until radiologically determined PD per RECIST v 1.1, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal from study.
1
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC including those with ER or PGR low positive disease who had progressed on at least 1 line, but no more than 3 lines, of cytotoxic therapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting and had not received prior therapy with an ICI or other immunotherapy in the metastatic setting were included in this cohort. Patients received fruquintinib 5 mg orally QD for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off in every 4-week cycle in combination with tislelizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q4W until radiologically determined PD per RECIST v 1.1, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal from study.
11
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)
Patients with advanced or metastatic EC who had progressed on 1 prior, platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for EC and had not received prior therapy with an ICI or other immunotherapy were included in this cohort. Patients received fruquintinib 5 mg orally QD for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off in every 4-week cycle in combination with tislelizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q4W until radiologically determined PD per RECIST v 1.1, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal from study.
1
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)
Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic MSS CRC who had failed 2 lines of standard chemotherapies, including fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and had received anti-VEGF (if RAS: wild-type tumor, mutated or status unknown) or EGFR (if RAS wild-type tumor) antibody treatment were included in this cohort. Patients received fruquintinib 5 mg orally QD for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off in every 4-week cycle in combination with tislelizumab 300 mg IV infusion Q4W until radiologically determined PD per RECIST v 1.1, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal from study.
39
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Part 2Death018020
Part 2Investigator decision00001
Part 2Lost to Follow-up00002
Part 2Progressive disease00002
Part 2Sponsor terminated study00314
Part 2Withdrawal by Subject000010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 2: Cohort A: TNBC (IO-Treated in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants8 Participants0 Participants32 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants9 Participants1 Participants32 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants10 Participants1 Participants31 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants11 Participants1 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants27 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 18 / 110 / 120 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 111 / 111 / 139 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12 / 111 / 120 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(AEs) v5.0, DLT was defined as any 1 of following toxicities during DLT assessment window and considered by Investigator to be related to 1 or more study treatments:a)Hematologic: grade(G) 4 neutropenia lasting \>7 days, G ≥3 febrile neutropenia, G 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding, G 4 thrombocytopenia, G ≥4 anemia.b) Non-hematologic:all G ≥3 non-hematologic toxicities except:G 3 endocrinopathy controlled by hormonal replacement with no hospitalization and resolved to G ≤1 within 7 days, G 3 nausea/vomiting or diarrhea for \<72 hours with antiemetic and supportive care, G 3 fatigue for \<1 week, G ≥3 electrolyte abnormality lasting up to 72 hours and resolving with treatment, G 3 rash returning to baseline or G ≤1 within 7 days with treatment,G ≥3 amylase or lipase elevation without symptoms of pancreatitis,G 3 hypertension returning to baseline or G≤1 within 7 days with treatment.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)

Population: The DLT-evaluable analysis set included all patients enrolled in Part 1 of the study who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab and were considered DLT-evaluable based on the safety review committee review, according to the pre-specified criteria from the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 1: Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)1 Participants
Primary

Part 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Fruquintinib in Combination With Tislelizumab

The RP2D of fruquintinib in combination with tislelizumab based on the safety and tolerability assessments in Part 1 patients.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Fruquintinib in Combination With Tislelizumab5 mg
Primary

Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm). The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)27.3 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)0 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)5.1 percentage of patients
Secondary

Part 1: Objective Response Rate

The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed BOR of CR or PR as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 1: Objective Response Rate16.7 percentage of patients
Secondary

Part 2: Change From Baseline in Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression

Expression of PD-L1 biomarker was planned to be assessed in tumor tissues of the patients. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to the first administration of any study treatment (whichever occurred first), including scheduled and unscheduled visits, unless otherwise specified.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to end of treatment, up to approximately 20 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. Based upon the strategic evaluation of clinical development of fruquintinib in the United States, the study was early terminated prior to data collection for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study patient temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the treatment. An AE was considered serious if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, was a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, was an abnormal pregnancy outcome in a child born to a female patient/female partner of a male patient exposed to study treatment or was an important medical event. TEAEs were AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, approximately 21 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs1 Participants
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTESAEs0 Participants
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to fruquintinib treatment discontinuation1 Participants
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to tislelizumab treatment discontinuation1 Participants
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTESAEs2 Participants
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to fruquintinib treatment discontinuation1 Participants
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to tislelizumab treatment discontinuation1 Participants
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs11 Participants
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to fruquintinib treatment discontinuation1 Participants
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTESAEs1 Participants
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to tislelizumab treatment discontinuation0 Participants
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs1 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to tislelizumab treatment discontinuation9 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTESAEs20 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs39 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Part 2: Number of Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and TEAEs Leading to Treatment DiscontinuationTEAEs leading to fruquintinib treatment discontinuation9 Participants
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

The CBR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR, PR, or durable SD (i.e., lasting for at least 6 months) as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. Durable SD was SD for at least 6 months. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)16.7 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)0 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)27.3 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)0 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)20.5 percentage of patients
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

The DCR was defined as the percentage of patients with a BOR of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 7 weeks as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until documented RECIST v1.1 progression or the start date of new anticancer therapy, whichever came first. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.

Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)50.0 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)0 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)72.7 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)100 percentage of patients
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)53.8 percentage of patients
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response (DoR)

The DoR was defined as the time from the first occurrence of PR or CR by RECIST v1.1, whichever came first until PD or death. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type. Only those patients with PR or CR (responders) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response (DoR)14.9 months
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response (DoR)14.9 months
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response (DoR)NA months
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to Tislelizumab

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to detect ADAs to tislelizumab. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA negative at baseline and ADA positive post-baseline. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as ADA positive at baseline that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following treatment administration.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of treatment, up to approximately 17 months for Part 1 and 20 months for Part 2

Population: The ADA analysis set included all patients who received at least 1 dose of tislelizumab and had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline ADA result. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Boosted ADA0 Participants
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Induced ADA2 Participants
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Boosted ADA0 Participants
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Induced ADA0 Participants
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Induced ADA3 Participants
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Boosted ADA0 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Boosted ADA0 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Induced ADA0 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Induced ADA10 Participants
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Number of Patients With Antidrug Antibodies (ADAs) to TislelizumabTreatment-Boosted ADA2 Participants
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from start of study treatment until the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to date of death due to any cause, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)16.4 months
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)25.8 months
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)14.1 months
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)NA months
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)10.2 months
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of fruquintinib and metabolite M11.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Days 1, 8, 15, 21 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 4, 7, 13; 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 21 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all patients with at least 1 quantifiable plasma or serum concentration of fruquintinib and/or tislelizumab. Only unique patients in Parts 1 and 2 were considered for PK analysis. Cohort A did not enroll any unique patients in Part 2. Only patients who had a quantifiable plasma/serum concentration of fruquintinib at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 21: 2 to 4 hours post-dose327 nanograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose5.49 nanograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 21: Pre-dose148 nanograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 21: 2 to 4 hours post-dose124 nanograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 21: Pre-dose252 nanograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose240 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 72.7
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 21: Pre-dose216 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 59.5
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 21: Pre-dose106 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 40
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 21: 2 to 4 hours post-dose327 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose23.2 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.3
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose16.6 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose87.3 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 32.4
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 8: Pre-dose84.2 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 53.5
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose5.12 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose0.415 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.643
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose56.2 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 52.9
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose30.8 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 12.6
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 8: Pre-dose222 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 29
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 21: 2 to 4 hours post-dose124 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose2.71 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose125 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose263 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose15.2 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose139 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose40.5 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose0.413 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0.766
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose15.3 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8.89
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 8: Pre-dose60.7 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 34.7
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose17.0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 17.7
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 7 Day 1: Pre-dose31.4 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8.6
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose74.6 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 45.9
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 21: 2 to 4 hours post-dose267 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 66.4
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 21: Pre-dose186 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 51.4
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 21: Pre-dose66.1 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 28
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose177 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 37.7
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 8: Pre-dose195 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 57
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 1 Day 21: 2 to 4 hours post-dose69.1 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 25.4
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 to 4 hours post-dose70.7 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 34.3
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 13 Day 1: Pre-dose11.7 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose20.5 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.4
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose0 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11M11: Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose19.3 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.4
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 13 Day 1: Pre-dose12.3 nanograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Plasma Concentrations of Fruquintinib and Metabolite M11Fruquintinib: Cycle 7 Day 1: Pre-dose28.6 nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 19.1
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment until the first radiographic documentation of objective progression as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause. The PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (nadir), including baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame: Tumor assessments performed every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) until PD, up to a maximum of approximately 34 months

Population: The SAS included all enrolled patients who received at least 1 dose of fruquintinib or tislelizumab. As pre-specified in SAP, all patients from Part 1 were also included in the relevant Cohorts in Part 2 based on their tumor type.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)3.8 months
Part 2: Cohort B: TNBC (IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)NA months
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)5.0 months
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)5.5 months
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)3.6 months
Secondary

Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of Tislelizumab

Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to determine serum concentrations of tislelizumab.

Time frame: Pre-infusion on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 4, 7, 13; at end of infusion on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 4; on Days 8, 15, and 21 of Cycle 1 (cycle duration: 4 weeks)

Population: The PK analysis set included all patients with at least 1 quantifiable plasma or serum concentration of fruquintinib and/or tislelizumab. Only unique patients in Parts 1 and 2 were considered for PK analysis. Cohort A did not enroll any unique patients in Part 2. Only patients who had a quantifiable plasma/serum concentration of tislelizumab at specified timepoints are reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-infusion22.2 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8.27
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-infusion29.9 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.8
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1534.3 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 11.2
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: End of infusion158 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 47.6
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 2127.3 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 13.1
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: End of infusion105 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 23.5
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 849.5 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 12.7
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 13 Day 1: Pre-infusion45.9 micrograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 7 Day 1: Pre-infusion57.2 micrograms per milliliter
Part 1: Solid Tumor of Any Type (IO-Treated/IO-Naïve in the Metastatic Setting)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: Pre-infusion0 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1531.4 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7.63
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: End of infusion172 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7.78
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 7 Day 1: Pre-infusion50.0 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 31
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 854.4 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.1
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 13 Day 1: Pre-infusion26.0 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: Pre-infusion0 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 2128.1 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 6.58
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: End of infusion101 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 22.7
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-infusion19.3 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 10.5
Part 2: Cohort C: EC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-infusion41.0 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 15.5
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-infusion46.6 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-infusion21.5 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: End of infusion74.0 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1536.7 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: End of infusion137 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: Pre-infusion0 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 845.2 micrograms per milliliter
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 13 Day 1: Pre-infusion34.9 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 7.32
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: Pre-infusion0 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 0
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1: End of infusion78.3 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 19.9
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 839.2 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 10
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 1527.7 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8.72
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 1 Day 2120.3 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5.58
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-infusion15.1 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5.14
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-infusion25.1 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 8.64
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 4 Day 1: End of infusion114 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 25.4
Part 2: Cohort D: MSS mCRC (IO-Naïve)Parts 1 and 2: Serum Concentrations of TislelizumabCycle 7 Day 1: Pre-infusion35.5 micrograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 14.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026