Skip to content

Quantitative Ultrasound With Liver Incytes for Evaluation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Quantitative Ultrasound With Liver Incytes for Evaluation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04576923
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-10-06
Start date
2021-03-19
Completion date
2022-04-26
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NAFLD, NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the utility of Liver Incytes in assessing NAFLD with or without advanced fibrosis in patients seen in liver clinics for suspected NAFLD diagnosis.

Detailed description

The proposed study will evaluate the performance characteristics of LSM as a measure of fibrosis and ACE as a measure of hepatic steatosis by Liver Incytes in patients with different stages of NAFLD. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of ACE will be compared to CAP and LSM as measured by Liver Incytes to that measured by FibroScan® using liver histology as the reference standard. The performance of these two methods will also be compared to that of non-invasive blood based markers such as APRI, FIB4, and NAFLD fibrosis score in predicting advanced fibrosis in biopsy proven NAFLD.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVelacur by Sonic Incytes

liver stiffness measurement

Sponsors

Sonic Incytes
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This is an open label study in that all participants will receive the same study procedures.

Intervention model description

All participants will undergo quantitative ultrasound with Liver Incytes by a certified technician.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults aged 21 years or older 2. Suspected NAFLD or NASH with plans to undergo standard of care liver biopsy 3. History of biopsy proven NAFLD or NASH within 6 months prior to enrollment 4. Planned liver biopsy for evaluation of NAFLD within 6 months of enrollment 5. Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Fasting for less than three hours prior to the scan 2. Subject is a pregnant or lactating female 3. Subject with current, significant alcohol consumption or history of significant alcohol consumption for a period of more than 3 consecutive months any time within 1 year prior to screening. Significant alcohol consumption is defined as more than 20 gram per day in females and more than 30 grams per day in males, on average (a standard drink in the US is considered to be 14 grams of alcohol). 4. Subject is unable to reliably quantify alcohol consumption based upon local study physician judgment. 5. Subject uses drugs historically associated with NAFLD (amiodarone, methotrexate, systemic glucocorticoids, tetracyclines, tamoxifen, estrogens at doses greater than those used for hormone replacement, anabolic steroids, valproic acid, and other known hepatotoxins) for more than 2 weeks in the year prior to screening 6. Subject with history of cirrhosis or clinical evidence of hepatic decompensation as defined by the presence of any of the following abnormalities at screening 1. Serum albumin less than 3.5 grams/deciliter (g/dL). 2. INR greater than 1.5. 3. Direct bilirubin greater than 1.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). 7. Subject has a history of bleeding esophageal varices, ascites or hepatic encephalopathy 8. Subject has history of other forms of chronic liver diseases such as viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, cholestatic liver disease (primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis). 9. Subject with active substance abuse 10. Acute hepatitis defined as AST/ALT \> 500 U/L 11. Patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator 12. Ascites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacurone dayAssessing correlation of liver stiffness measurements (LSM) as measured by Velacur to grade of fibrosis on liver histology of patients with NAFLD who underwent standard of care liver biopsy. Results are reported per fibrosis category: F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4.
Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastographyone dayAssessing correlation of liver stiffness measurements (LSM) as measured by FibroScan to grade of fibrosis on liver histology of patients with NAFLD who underwent standard of care liver biopsy. Results are reported per fibrosis category: F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation of Velacur Measurements to Non-Invasive Blood Markers for Predicting Advanced Fibrosisone dayThis was initially included in our study protocol as an outcome measurement. However, we realized that these markers were not being routinely collected and the data are simply not available. Therefore, no outcome data are or can be included for this measurement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of the 36 participants who enrolled in the study, only 21 people had a valid Velacur study and valid ultrasound elasticity imaging. All 36 people completed the study but 15 people were later found to have results that were deemed to not be valid upon review by Sonic Incytes.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 36 participants who enrolled in the study, only 21 people had a valid Velacur study and valid ultrasound elasticity imaging. All 36 people completed the study but 15 people were later found to have results that were deemed to not be valid upon review by Sonic Incytes.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Velacur by Sonic Incytes
Patients with known or suspected Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) or Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) will be scanned with Liver Incytes. Of the 36 participants who enrolled in the study, only 21 people had a valid Velacur study and valid ultrasound elasticity imaging. All 36 people completed the study but 15 people were later found to have results that were deemed to not be valid upon review by Sonic Incytes.
21
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Study15 had scans that were determined to be invalid and these are not reported within the results.15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVelacur by Sonic Incytes
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
BMI measured in kg/m^234.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography

Assessing correlation of liver stiffness measurements (LSM) as measured by FibroScan to grade of fibrosis on liver histology of patients with NAFLD who underwent standard of care liver biopsy. Results are reported per fibrosis category: F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4.

Time frame: one day

Population: Of the 36 enrolled participants, 21 were determined to have results that were considered to be reliable for both the Velacur and transient elastography via FibroScan and underwent a liver biopsy less than 6 months prior to the Velacur and FibroScan measurements.~Results are reported for two participants with F0 biopsy results.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F0Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography11.1 kPaStandard Deviation 4.3
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F1Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography10.1 kPaStandard Deviation 3.5
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F2Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography15.3 kPaStandard Deviation 8.3
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F3Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography7.5 kPaStandard Deviation 1.9
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F4Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography18.2 kPaStandard Deviation 9.1
Primary

Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacur

Assessing correlation of liver stiffness measurements (LSM) as measured by Velacur to grade of fibrosis on liver histology of patients with NAFLD who underwent standard of care liver biopsy. Results are reported per fibrosis category: F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4.

Time frame: one day

Population: Of the 36 enrolled participants, 21 were determined to have results that were considered to be reliable for both the Velacur and transient elastography via FibroScan and underwent a liver biopsy less than 6 months prior to the Velacur and FibroScan measurements.~Results are reported for two participants with F0 biopsy results.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F0Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacur9.8 kPaStandard Deviation 4.4
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F1Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacur7.2 kPaStandard Deviation 2.3
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F2Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacur7.4 kPaStandard Deviation 1.6
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F3Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacur7.5 kPaStandard Deviation 1.9
Velacur by Sonic Incytes for Stage F4Liver Stiffness Measured by Velacur10.5 kPaStandard Deviation 5
Other Pre-specified

Correlation of Velacur Measurements to Non-Invasive Blood Markers for Predicting Advanced Fibrosis

This was initially included in our study protocol as an outcome measurement. However, we realized that these markers were not being routinely collected and the data are simply not available. Therefore, no outcome data are or can be included for this measurement.

Time frame: one day

Population: During the conduct of this trial, we realized that these markers were not being routinely collected. For this study, no data for these markers were collected and are thus not available. As a result, no outcome data are or can be included for this measurement for any of the stages.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026