Skip to content

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Severe Stroke

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Severe Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04576013
Enrollment
12
Registered
2020-10-05
Start date
2016-02-23
Completion date
2021-02-22
Last updated
2021-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

neuroplasticity, rehabilitation, peripheral nerve stimulation, motor training

Brief summary

Subjects will receive non-invasive stimulation of nerves on their arm and intensive motor training of their arm. The timing of the stimulation in relation to the training will vary by group.

Detailed description

This study will look at the differences in improvement of hand and arm function when nerve stimulation is applied at different times in relation to motor training. The nerve stimulation, called peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), is non-invasive and painless. Subjects in the study may receive strong or mild PNS. Subjects will also vary by whether PNS is delivered for 2 hours before the 2 hours of motor training, or during the 2 hours of motor training. Which level of stimulation and its timing will be determined randomly for each subject.

Interventions

Non-invasive stimulation is applied to 3 nerves of the arm. The stimulation will be set at a level that is not painful or uncomfortable.

Sponsors

University of Kentucky
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have severe upper extremity motor deficit after a single stroke * Stroke onset at least 12 months ago

Exclusion criteria

* Addition or change in the dosage of drugs known to exert detrimental effects on motor recovery within 3 months of enrollment * Untreated depression * History of multiple strokes * History of seizure * History of head injury with loss of consciousness, severe alcohol or drug abuse, or psychiatric illness * Positive pregnancy test or being of childbearing age and not using appropriate contraception * Presence of ferromagnetic material in the cranium except in the mouth, including metal fragments from occupational exposure, and surgical clips in or near the brain * Cardiac or neural pacemakers or implanted medication pumps * Receptive aphasia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer AssessmentBaseline, Immediately post-interventionThis is a quantitative measure of motor recovery, coordination, and speed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Action Research Arm TestBaseline, Immediately post-interventionThis test measures changes in the upper extremity and consists of four specific tests to measure grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.
Stroke Impact ScaleBaseline, Immediately post-interventionThis is a self-report that assesses strength, hand function, activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation.
Cortical motor map volumeBaseline, Immediately post-interventionThis is performed using non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation to determine which parts of the brain control a muscle in the arm or hand.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026