Psychosocial Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Conditions
Keywords
Psychological Distress, Coping Behaviors, Covid19
Brief summary
The health crisis imposed by COVID-19 is forcing major worldwide social reorganization that will have profound consequences on our society. Currently, one-third of the world's population (\ 3 billion individuals) is living under some kind of isolation or quarantine measures, causing an unprecedented and rapidly evolving psychosocial crisis. The psychosocial consequences of this health crisis will persist long after restriction measures are lifted and the pandemic is over. This impact will be significant for individuals facing unique contexts or challenges (e.g., older adults, individuals living with a disability, underprivileged families) and will most likely exacerbate existing social and gender inequalities in health and human development. There is an urgent need for information on the evolution of the psychosocial dimensions of health and coping strategies used by our population and our health and social services structures. Thus, this study is designed to accelerate the availability of high-quality, real-time evidence within health and social services structures to address, support and minimize psychosocial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through constantly evolving research questions responsive to the course of the pandemic evolution, the rapid system transformations and adaptation of services, and knowledge users (KUs) needs, MAVIPAN aims to address, document, monitor, and evaluate the following: 1. Individuals and families' adjustments and mitigation strategies, especially for those considered vulnerable and in high-risk contexts. 2. Healthcare and social services workers and managers' adjustments and mitigation strategies. 3. The organization of service structures. 4. The social and economic response. To achieve these objectives, we use a mixed methods study design that combines quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews to deepen our understanding of elements such as the coping strategies used during the pandemic. A first measure was taken during lock-down as well as a follow-up at 3 months. Another follow-up will be made at 7 months. At least one per year follow-up will be made over the course of the study (5 years). Additional measures may be taken depending on the evolution of the pandemic and the sanitary measures put in place by the authorities.
Interventions
No intervention, this is an observational study that uses validated questionnaires and qualitative interviews.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* General population
Exclusion criteria
* Not a resident of the province of Quebec * Age under 14
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | The DASS-21 is a measure of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms. The score on each subscale varies from 0 to 21. A higher score means a higher level of symptoms. |
| Insomnia Severity Index | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | Scores vary between 0 and 28. A higher score means greater insomnia severity. |
| Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | Scores range from 7 to 35 and higher scores indicate higher positive well-being. |
| Hostility subscale- Symptoms Checklist-90-Revised | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | Only the Hostility subscale that measures thoughts, feelings and actions characteristic of anger is used. Scores range from 6 to 24 and higher scores indicate higher level of hostility |
| Substance use | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | These are self-report questions that measure the change in consumption level of different substances such as alcool, prescriptions medications and illicit drugs prior and after the lockdown. |
| Brief COPE | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | We use a subset of questions taken from the Brief Cope which measures coping strategies. |
| Dyadic Adjustment Scale | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | We use a subset of questions taken from the Dyadic Adjustment Scale which measures couple satisfaction. |
| Parental Stress Index | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | We only use the Interaction subscale which measures the extent to which the parent believes the child is not meeting expectations and finds interactions with the child are not reinforcing his parenting role. |
| Child Conflict Tactic Scale | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | We use a subset of questions that measures the presence of minor physical abuse as well as psychological abuse. |
| Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | We use a subset of questions that aim to measure different child behaviors and personality caracteristics. |
| Healthcare workers adaptation | Baseline (measured during lockdown in March 2020) | We use a series of questions that assess different changes that may have occured in their work, as well as a series of beliefs they may hold concerning their work and their patients/clients. |
Countries
Canada