Skip to content

us Elastography and us Doppler in Differentiating Breast Masses

Comparative Study of US Elastography and Color Doppler US in Differentiating Breast Masses in Correlation to Histopathology

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04574531
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-10-05
Start date
2021-09-30
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2020-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Lump (Malignant)

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of grey scale US , US elastography & color Doppler US in differentiating breast masses comparable with histopathology as a gold standard.

Detailed description

Breast cancer is the most fre¬quently diagnosed cancer and the chief cause of cancer death among women worldwide, with an es¬timated 1.7 million cases. Breast cancer alone accounts for 25% of all cancer cases and 15% of all cancer deaths among females .so, Its high incidence has led to research on new diagnostic imaging techniques for early diagnosis and to improve patient's mortality rate\[1\]. Application of imaging techniques together with other investigation would help clinical decision making. the most important factor in reducing mortality of certain cancers is an early diagnosis of cancer via screening based on imaging\[2\]. US is an accurate method for detection of breast masses ; however, US has a low accuracy in differentiating between benign from malignant breast masses . US could suggest a malignancy likelihood criteria of a breast mass, such as hypoechogenicity, irregular margins, microcalcifications, increased vascularity by Doppler and us elastography \[3\]. Ultrasound elastography provides a non-invasive evaluation of the stiffness of a lesion. Recent studies show that ultrasonographic elastogra¬phy (USE) provides higher diagnostic accuracy together with Doppler application compared with conventional B-mode ultrasonography during breast cancer diagnosis, which eventually helps to reduce false-positive results (ie, increased specificity) and therefore is useful in avoiding breast biopsy\[4\]. US elastography has been used to detect the nature of breast lesions , by measuring the tissue stiffness non invasively. It depends on tissue deformation strain that is caused by external compression. it is complementary to gray scale findings particularly in lesions with indeterminate US findings, also US elastography could be used to guide the follow up of leisons diagnosed as benign at ( FNA) fine needle aspiration.\[5\]\[6\]

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with breast masses referred to our department of diagnostic radiology for radiological assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with purely cystic lesions on conventional breast ultrasound. Breast implant. Superficial lesions (\>5 mm deep to skin surface).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparison between us elastography and doppler us of breast masses with the histopathology of the specimensbaselinecomparitive study between us elastography and doppler us of breast masses in differentiating breast masses

Contacts

Primary Contactasmaa sayed mohamed abd elsamie
asmaasmhmd7@gmail.com01556663434
Backup Contactsamy abd elaziz sayed, MD
samy5abdlaziz@yahoo.com01006788053

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026