Clinical Performance of Low Technique Sensitive Self Cured Universal Adhesive Vrs Light Cured Universal Adhesive in Patients With (NCCLs): 18 m RCT

Clinical Performance of Low Technique Sensitive Self-cured Universal Adhesive Versus Light Cured Universal Adhesive in Patients With Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs): 18 Month Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04572386

Enrollment

Registered

2020-10-01

Start date

2020-10-31

Completion date

2022-07-31

Last updated

2020-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Carious Cervical Lesion

Keywords

universal bond, NCCls, 3m single bond universal, Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan, self cure, non carious cervical lesions

Brief summary

This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of self-cured adhesive versus light cured universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) resin composite restorations after 18 month

Interventions

OTHERlight cure 3m single bond universal bond

light -cure universal bond

OTHERSelf-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan)

Self-cure universal bond with no light cure

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 55 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* particepant with age rang 18-55 * particepant with non carious cervical lesion

Exclusion criteria

* particepant outside age rang * particepant with periodontal problem that might affect the teeth to be treated

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Number of fracture restoration	18 month	Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss .followed by tactile inspection using fdi prob for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention
number of restoration with retention loss	18-month	Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Number of restoration with change in colour or texture	18 month	Evaluation will be done visually following FDI criteria to ensure no change in colour or texture of the restoration
Number of restoration caused biological harm	18 month	Evaluation will be done following FDI criteria using FDI prob to ensure no change in restoration that caused any harm to the health of biological strucure

Contacts

Primary ContactAya Gamal, masters

yoyo_ga@hotmail.com01004222615

Backup ContactRawda husien, Phd

01001097200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026