Skip to content

Next Generation X-ray Imaging System

Next Generation X-ray Imaging System

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04571099
Enrollment
28
Registered
2020-09-30
Start date
2020-10-08
Completion date
2021-03-26
Last updated
2024-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Acute

Brief summary

Philips Healthcare has developed a next generation Allura investigational device. The intended purpose of the investigational device is to perform neurovascular imaging applications, including diagnostic, interventional and minimally invasive procedures on human patients. The goal of this study is to investigate the accuracy of the next generation Allura investigational device to determine the extent and localization of ischemic stroke changes in brain tissue.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient has signed and dated the Informed Consent Form (ICF) 2. Age ≥ 50 years old 3. Clinical and radiological signs consistent with acute stroke I. Patient diagnosed with ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation and not eligible for thrombectomy. II. Patient diagnosed with ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation and subjected to thrombectomy. III. Patient diagnosed with hemorrhagic stroke.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 2. Previous stroke or parenchymal damage/defects in anterior circulation territories (only applicable for subjects included by criterion 3.I or 3.II). 3. Subject participates in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of the study. 4. Participation in the study exposes the subject to risk, as assessed at the discretion of the treating physician. 5. All subjects who meet an

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ischemic Stroke Diagnostic Accuracy (CBCT Versus CT)Within 2 days after procedureAccuracy of dual energy CBCT ASPECTS score to determine the extent and localization of ischemic stroke changes in brain tissue, evaluated by three independent neuroradiologists, using non enhanced CT ASPECTS as reference standard. The Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) is a 10-point quantitative topographic CT scan score used for middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke patients. Segmental estimation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) vascular territory is made, and 1 point is deducted from the initial score of 10 for every region involved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Dual Layer CBCT Images With Non-inferior Vessel Tree Visibility Compared to CTA (Reference Standard)Within 2 days after procedurePercentage of images made with new investigational device (dual layer CBCT) rated non-inferior vessel visibility compared to CTA (reference standard). Vessel visibility was evaluated separately as indicators of diagnostic quality on 5-point Likert scales, adopted with slight modifications from previous studies (5: excellent vessel visibility or no artifacts, 1:vessel not visible or extensive artifacts). Sixteen intracranial arterial segments were prospectively defined for the reader study. The score difference between DL-CBCTA and CTA for each segment in each patient determined whether a segment was considered inferior, equal or superior.
Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection Accuracy (CBCT With CT as Reference Standard)Within 2 days after procedureAccuracy of images made with new investigational device (dual layer CBCT) to determine the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (Yes/No) using non enhanced CT as the reference standard as judged by the individual reader (neuroradiologist) through blinded reader assessment.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
I - Ischemic Stroke, no Thrombectomy
I - Ischemic stroke, no thrombectomy
3
II - Ischemic Stroke, Thrombectomy
II - Ischemic stroke, thrombectomy
22
III - Hemorrhagic Stroke
III - Hemorrhagic stroke
3
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicI - Ischemic Stroke, no ThrombectomyII - Ischemic Stroke, ThrombectomyIII - Hemorrhagic StrokeTotal
Age, Continuous69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
74.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
74.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Body Mass Index (BMI)28.5 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
25.4 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
22.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
25.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
3 participants22 participants3 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants16 Participants0 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants6 Participants3 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 220 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 30 / 220 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 220 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Ischemic Stroke Diagnostic Accuracy (CBCT Versus CT)

Accuracy of dual energy CBCT ASPECTS score to determine the extent and localization of ischemic stroke changes in brain tissue, evaluated by three independent neuroradiologists, using non enhanced CT ASPECTS as reference standard. The Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) is a 10-point quantitative topographic CT scan score used for middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke patients. Segmental estimation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) vascular territory is made, and 1 point is deducted from the initial score of 10 for every region involved.

Time frame: Within 2 days after procedure

Population: Each ASPECTS region was assessed individually (affected versus non-affected).~Hemorrhagic stroke patients were excluded for this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
I - Ischemic Stroke, no ThrombectomyIschemic Stroke Diagnostic Accuracy (CBCT Versus CT)90 percentage of gold standard
II - Ischemic Stroke, ThrombectomyIschemic Stroke Diagnostic Accuracy (CBCT Versus CT)90 percentage of gold standard
Secondary

Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection Accuracy (CBCT With CT as Reference Standard)

Accuracy of images made with new investigational device (dual layer CBCT) to determine the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (Yes/No) using non enhanced CT as the reference standard as judged by the individual reader (neuroradiologist) through blinded reader assessment.

Time frame: Within 2 days after procedure

Population: The target for hemorrhage detection was set to not miss any bleeding given a limited number of participants.~Three primary hemorrhages (III - Hemorrhagic stroke) and five hemorrhagic transformations of ischemic stroke (II - Ischemic stroke, thrombectomy) were detected in the reference CT examinations. Hence, eight matched scans with hemorrhages were included in the analysis (28% of all scans).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
II - Ischemic Stroke, ThrombectomyIntracranial Hemorrhage Detection Accuracy (CBCT With CT as Reference Standard)100 percentage of gold standard
III - Hemorrhagic StrokeIntracranial Hemorrhage Detection Accuracy (CBCT With CT as Reference Standard)100 percentage of gold standard
Secondary

Percentage of Dual Layer CBCT Images With Non-inferior Vessel Tree Visibility Compared to CTA (Reference Standard)

Percentage of images made with new investigational device (dual layer CBCT) rated non-inferior vessel visibility compared to CTA (reference standard). Vessel visibility was evaluated separately as indicators of diagnostic quality on 5-point Likert scales, adopted with slight modifications from previous studies (5: excellent vessel visibility or no artifacts, 1:vessel not visible or extensive artifacts). Sixteen intracranial arterial segments were prospectively defined for the reader study. The score difference between DL-CBCTA and CTA for each segment in each patient determined whether a segment was considered inferior, equal or superior.

Time frame: Within 2 days after procedure

Population: Contrast enhanced scans where not collected for Ischemic stroke, no thrombectomy (I) \& Hemorrhagic stroke patients (III), hence where not part of this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
II - Ischemic Stroke, ThrombectomyPercentage of Dual Layer CBCT Images With Non-inferior Vessel Tree Visibility Compared to CTA (Reference Standard)77 percentage of gold standard

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026