Skip to content

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI3506 in Adults With Uncontrolled Moderate-to-severe Asthma

A Phase II, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI3506 in Adult Participants With Uncontrolled Moderate-to-severe Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04570657
Acronym
FRONTIER-3
Enrollment
250
Registered
2020-09-30
Start date
2020-09-17
Completion date
2023-02-06
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

MEDI3506, lung function, IL-33, inflammation

Brief summary

Study D9181C00001 is a Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, proof of concept study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of MEDI3506 in adult participants with uncontrolled moderate to severe asthma on standard of care (SOC). Up to approximately 80 sites globally will participate in this study. Approximately 228 participants will be randomized to 3 treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive MEDI3506 dose 1, MEDI3506 dose 2, or placebo.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMEDI3506

Participants will receive multiple doses of MEDI3506 at dose level 1 or dose level 2

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive multiple doses of placebo

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 to \< 65 years of age * Physician-diagnosed asthma of early onset, defined as development of asthma before the age of 25 years. * History of ≥ 1 asthma exacerbation in previous 24 months * Treated with medium to high dose ICS defined as total daily dose of \> 250 g fluticasone dry powder or equivalent, for at least 12 months and on a stable dose for ≥ 3 months. * Stable LABA therapy for ≥ 3 months. * An ACQ-6 score ≥ 1.5. * Morning pre-BD FEV1 ≥ 40% predicted normal and \> 1 L. * Morning pre-BD FEV1 \< 85% predicted normal. * Participants with documented evidence of asthma as demonstrated by either: * BD reversibility, within 12 months, or at screening, or * Positive methacholine challenge test within 12 months. * Bodyweight ≥ 40 kg and BMI \< 40 kg/m2. * For female participants, a negative pregnancy test. * Abide by contraception requirements for males and females * Provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with a positive diagnostic nucleic acid test for SARS-CoV-2. * Participants with a significant COVID-19 illness within 6 months of enrolment: * Participants with a recent history of, or who have a positive test for, infective hepatitis or unexplained jaundice, or participants who have been treated for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV. * Evidence of active or latent TB: * An LVEF \< 45% measured by echocardiogram during screening. * A family history of heart failure. * Current smokers or recent ex-smokers i.e., have quit e cigarettes or other inhaled tobacco products ≤ 6 months prior to SV1. * Ex-smokers with a total smoking history of \> 10 pack years. * As judged by the investigator, any evidence of any active medical or psychiatric condition or other reason (prior to randomisation) that in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the participant to participate in the study. * Any clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma. * Any other clinically relevant abnormal findings on physical examination or laboratory testing, that in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor might compromise the safety of the participant in the study or interfere with evaluation of the study intervention. * A known history of severe reaction to any medication including biologic agents or human gamma globulin therapy. * History of, or a reason to believe, a participant has a history of, drug or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years. * Current diagnosis of cancer. * History of cancer, except if treated with apparent success with curative therapy (response duration of \> 5 years). * History of allogeneic bone marrow transplant. * A helminth parasitic infection diagnosed within 6 months prior to SV4 (randomisation) that has not been treated, or has not responded to SOC therapy. * An asthma exacerbation within 8 weeks. * Receiving any prohibited concomitant medications or therapies as specified in the protocol: Known history of allergy or reaction to any component of the study intervention formulation, including hereditary fructose intolerance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) as Measured in the Study ClinicBaseline and week 16In-clinic spirometry measurements were taken prior to the administration of bronchodilators. Baseline was the last measurement prior to first injection of investigational product (IP). The least squares (LS) means, LS mean differences and 80% confidence intervals (CIs), and one-sided p-value results were based on a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM). The model included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) total daily dose, visit, treatment, and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicBaseline and weeks 8 and 16In-clinic spirometry measurements were taken following the use of bronchodilators. Bronchodilatation was induced using albuterol (90 µg metered dose), salbutamol (100 µg metered dose), or levalbuterol (45 µg metered dose), and measurements were taken after up to a maximum of 4 inhalations. Baseline was the last measurement prior to first injection of IP. The LS means, LS mean differences and 80% CIs, and one-sided p-value results were based on MMRM. The model included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment, and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements.
Serum Concentrations of TozorakimabPharmacokinetic (PK) samples were taken pre-dose (day 1) and at weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Tozorakimab serum concentrations were measured using a validated assay method.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Blood samples were taken pre-dose (day 1) and at weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24ADA prevalence is the number of participants ADA positive (ADA+) at baseline and/or post-baseline. Treatment-emergent ADA+ (TE-ADA +) positive is defined as being either of treatment-induced ADA+ (ADA negative \[ADA-\] at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA+) and treatment-boosted ADA+ (ADA+ at baseline and baseline titre is boosted by ≥ 4-fold increase at ≥ 1 post-baseline time point). Treatment-emergent ADA- (TE-ADA-) is defined as ADA+ but not fulfilling the definition of TE-ADA+. ADA persistently positive is defined as ADA- at baseline and ADA+ at ≥ 2 post-baseline assessment with ≥ 16 weeks between first and last positive assessments, or ADA+ at the last post-baseline assessment. ADA transiently positive is defined as ADA- at baseline, having at least one post-baseline ADA+ assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of ADA persistently positive. Baseline is defined as the last ADA assessment prior to first injection of IP.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) ScoreBaseline and week 16In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one BD-use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between \>0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores ≥1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Results were based on an MMRM which included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in asthma control.
Number of Participants With a Decrease in ACQ-6 Score ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and week 16In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one BD-use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between \>0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores ≥1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. A decrease in ACQ-6 score baseline indicates an improvement in asthma control, and individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.
Number of Participants Achieving ACQ-6 Well Controlled Status at Week 16Baseline and week 16In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one BD-use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between \>0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores ≥1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma.
Asthma CompEx Annualised Event RateBaseline to week 16The annualised rate of asthma CompEx events was calculated as the total number of asthma CompEx events / (date of last dose of IP + 28 - date of first dose of IP - recovery time + 1) / 365.25. The rates, rate ratios, and one-sided p-values were estimated from a negative binomial regression, with the log(follow up time) included as an offset term. The dependent variable will be the number of CompEx events during the on-treatment period (i.e., from baseline to last dose date +28 days), and the model will include treatment group, background medication, geographic region and baseline ICS total daily dose as covariates.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Concentration of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) in Exhaled BreathBaseline and week 16A standardised single-breath FeNO test was performed to evaluate airway inflammation. Results were based on MMRM on log-transformed change from baseline. Log-transformed change from baseline is calculated as the visit value in log minus the baseline value in log. The results from the model were then back transformed. The model included fixed effects for baseline (in log), background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within subject were considered as repeated measurements.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresBaseline and week 16The SGRQ is a 50-item patient-reported outcome instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases, giving a total score and 3 domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). The total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, with 100 representing the worst possible health status and 0 the best possible health status. Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in impairments. Results were based on an MMRM which included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements.
Number of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline to Week 16Baseline and week 16The SGRQ is a 50-item patient-reported outcome instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases, giving a total score and 3 domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). The total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, with 100 representing the worst possible health status and 0 the best possible health status. A decrease in the SGRQ total score indicates an improvement in overall impairment.
Number of Participants With at Least One Asthma CompEx Event From Baseline to Week 16Baseline to week 16Asthma CompEx is a combination of exacerbations of asthma and diary events (i.e., a combination of electronic diary \[eDiary\] variables). eDiary events are defined by criteria using morning/evening diary variables of PEF, symptoms, and use of rescue medication. A participant was considered to have a CompEx event if they had one or both of an asthma exacerbation or diary event. For participants who did not experience an on-treatment CompEx event, date of censoring was the minimum between the date of last dose + 28 days, and the last day of eDiary recording during the on-treatment period.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 MonthsBaseline and week 16In-clinic spirometry measurements were taken prior to the administration of bronchodilators. Baseline was the last measurement prior to first injection of IP. The LS means, LS mean differences and 80% CIs, and one-sided p-value results were based on MMRM. The model included fixed effects for baseline, visit, treatment, and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements. Analysis is presented by the number of asthma exacerbations experienced within the 12 months prior to baseline (1 or ≥ 2 exacerbations in the previous 12 months).
Eosinophil CountBaseline and Week 16The eosinophil count at baseline and week 16 are presented. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first injection of IP.

Countries

Argentina, Germany, Hungary, Poland, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled and randomised in 52 study centres in 7 countries including Argentina, Germany, Hungary, Poland, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States from 17 September 2020. The last participant completed their last study visit on 06 February 2023.

Pre-assignment details

Adult participants with uncontrolled moderate to severe asthma were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive tozorakimab (MEDI3506) Dose A (lower dose), tozorakimab Dose B (higher dose), or placebo. Of the 478 participants screened, 250 were enrolled, and of these, 15 were excluded from analysis due to invalidity of data (see limitations and caveats for further details).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tozorakimab Dose A
Participants were randomised to receive tozorakimab Dose A by subcutaneous (SC) injection.
77
Tozorakimab Dose B
Participants were randomised to receive tozorakimab Dose B by SC injection.
77
Placebo
Participants were randomised to receive placebo by SC injection.
81
Total235

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTozorakimab Dose ATozorakimab Dose BPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.37
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.87
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants24 Participants33 Participants83 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants53 Participants48 Participants152 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
4 Participants8 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
71 Participants67 Participants72 Participants210 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants54 Participants43 Participants150 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants23 Participants38 Participants85 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 770 / 770 / 81
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 7720 / 7720 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 774 / 772 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) as Measured in the Study Clinic

In-clinic spirometry measurements were taken prior to the administration of bronchodilators. Baseline was the last measurement prior to first injection of investigational product (IP). The least squares (LS) means, LS mean differences and 80% confidence intervals (CIs), and one-sided p-value results were based on a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM). The model included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) total daily dose, visit, treatment, and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) as Measured in the Study Clinic0.148 litresStandard Error 0.047
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) as Measured in the Study Clinic0.116 litresStandard Error 0.048
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-bronchodilator (Pre-BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) as Measured in the Study Clinic0.112 litresStandard Error 0.046
p-value: 0.26780% CI: [-0.038, 0.111]MMRM
p-value: 0.47380% CI: [-0.071, 0.079]MMRM
Secondary

Asthma CompEx Annualised Event Rate

The annualised rate of asthma CompEx events was calculated as the total number of asthma CompEx events / (date of last dose of IP + 28 - date of first dose of IP - recovery time + 1) / 365.25. The rates, rate ratios, and one-sided p-values were estimated from a negative binomial regression, with the log(follow up time) included as an offset term. The dependent variable will be the number of CompEx events during the on-treatment period (i.e., from baseline to last dose date +28 days), and the model will include treatment group, background medication, geographic region and baseline ICS total daily dose as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline to week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tozorakimab Dose AAsthma CompEx Annualised Event Rate0.86 events per participant-treatment year
Tozorakimab Dose BAsthma CompEx Annualised Event Rate0.69 events per participant-treatment year
PlaceboAsthma CompEx Annualised Event Rate0.99 events per participant-treatment year
p-value: 0.34680% CI: [0.56, 1.36]Negative binomial regression
p-value: 0.16680% CI: [0.43, 1.12]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total Scores

The SGRQ is a 50-item patient-reported outcome instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases, giving a total score and 3 domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). The total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, with 100 representing the worst possible health status and 0 the best possible health status. Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in impairments. Results were based on an MMRM which included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Total Score-10.133 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.815
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Activity Total Score-10.340 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.477
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Impacts Total Score-8.237 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Symptoms Total Score-15.290 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.828
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Total Score-11.366 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.838
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Activity Total Score-11.706 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.507
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Symptoms Total Score-19.130 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.873
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Impacts Total Score-8.509 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.774
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Total Score-9.470 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Impacts Total Score-6.816 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.689
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Symptoms Total Score-15.981 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.726
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Domain and Total ScoresSGRQ Activity Total Score-10.342 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.39
p-value: 0.580% CI: [-3.825, 3.828]MMRM
p-value: 0.32480% CI: [-5.198, 2.47]MMRM
p-value: 0.24880% CI: [-4.103, 1.26]MMRM
p-value: 0.2180% CI: [-4.383, 0.996]MMRM
p-value: 0.4280% CI: [-3.715, 5.096]MMRM
p-value: 0.18180% CI: [-7.579, 1.28]MMRM
p-value: 0.3880% CI: [-3.454, 2.129]MMRM
p-value: 0.19280% CI: [-4.694, 0.903]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Score

In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one BD-use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between \>0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores ≥1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. Results were based on an MMRM which included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Score-0.925 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.117
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Score-0.942 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.117
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Score-0.895 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.112
p-value: 0.41680% CI: [-0.215, 0.154]MMRM
p-value: 0.37180% CI: [-0.231, 0.137]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic

In-clinic spirometry measurements were taken following the use of bronchodilators. Bronchodilatation was induced using albuterol (90 µg metered dose), salbutamol (100 µg metered dose), or levalbuterol (45 µg metered dose), and measurements were taken after up to a maximum of 4 inhalations. Baseline was the last measurement prior to first injection of IP. The LS means, LS mean differences and 80% CIs, and one-sided p-value results were based on MMRM. The model included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment, and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 8 and 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicWeek 8-0.062 litresStandard Error 0.067
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicWeek 16-0.064 litresStandard Error 0.067
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicWeek 80.008 litresStandard Error 0.068
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicWeek 16-0.050 litresStandard Error 0.068
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicWeek 8-0.050 litresStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Weeks 8 and 16 in Post-bronchodilator (Post-BD) FEV1 as Measured in the Study ClinicWeek 16-0.026 litresStandard Error 0.06
p-value: 0.37280% CI: [-0.122, 0.072]MMRM
p-value: 0.43780% CI: [-0.11, 0.086]MMRM
p-value: 0.22180% CI: [-0.039, 0.157]MMRM
p-value: 0.30880% CI: [-0.136, 0.06]MMRM
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving ACQ-6 Well Controlled Status at Week 16

In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one BD-use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between \>0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores ≥1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with evaluable ACQ-6 scores were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants Achieving ACQ-6 Well Controlled Status at Week 1617 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants Achieving ACQ-6 Well Controlled Status at Week 1618 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving ACQ-6 Well Controlled Status at Week 1621 Participants
p-value: 0.57580% CI: [0.5, 1.31]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.67980% CI: [0.53, 1.38]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Decrease in ACQ-6 Score ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 16

In the ACQ-6, participants were asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one BD-use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions were weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). Mean scores of ≤ 0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between \>0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and scores ≥1.5 indicate not well-controlled asthma. A decrease in ACQ-6 score baseline indicates an improvement in asthma control, and individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered clinically meaningful.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with evaluable ACQ-6 scores were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With a Decrease in ACQ-6 Score ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 1653 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With a Decrease in ACQ-6 Score ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 1656 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Decrease in ACQ-6 Score ≥ 0.5 From Baseline to Week 1653 Participants
p-value: 0.61280% CI: [0.76, 1.9]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.34880% CI: [0.88, 2.25]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline to Week 16

The SGRQ is a 50-item patient-reported outcome instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases, giving a total score and 3 domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impacts). The total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, with 100 representing the worst possible health status and 0 the best possible health status. A decrease in the SGRQ total score indicates an improvement in overall impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with evaluable SGRQ scores were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline to Week 1650 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline to Week 1653 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Decrease in SGRQ Total Score of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline to Week 1654 Participants
p-value: 0.82880% CI: [0.59, 1.46]Chi-squared
p-value: 0.8480% CI: [0.68, 1.7]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

ADA prevalence is the number of participants ADA positive (ADA+) at baseline and/or post-baseline. Treatment-emergent ADA+ (TE-ADA +) positive is defined as being either of treatment-induced ADA+ (ADA negative \[ADA-\] at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA+) and treatment-boosted ADA+ (ADA+ at baseline and baseline titre is boosted by ≥ 4-fold increase at ≥ 1 post-baseline time point). Treatment-emergent ADA- (TE-ADA-) is defined as ADA+ but not fulfilling the definition of TE-ADA+. ADA persistently positive is defined as ADA- at baseline and ADA+ at ≥ 2 post-baseline assessment with ≥ 16 weeks between first and last positive assessments, or ADA+ at the last post-baseline assessment. ADA transiently positive is defined as ADA- at baseline, having at least one post-baseline ADA+ assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of ADA persistently positive. Baseline is defined as the last ADA assessment prior to first injection of IP.

Time frame: Blood samples were taken pre-dose (day 1) and at weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

Population: The as-treated population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)TE-ADA+3 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Both baseline and post-baseline positive0 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)TE-ADA-0 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA prevalence3 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA transiently positive0 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA persistently positive3 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Treatment-induced ADA+3 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)TE-ADA-1 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA prevalence3 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)TE-ADA+2 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Treatment-induced ADA+2 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Both baseline and post-baseline positive1 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA persistently positive1 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA transiently positive1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Both baseline and post-baseline positive0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)TE-ADA+1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA transiently positive1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA persistently positive0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)TE-ADA-0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Treatment-induced ADA+1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)ADA prevalence1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Asthma CompEx Event From Baseline to Week 16

Asthma CompEx is a combination of exacerbations of asthma and diary events (i.e., a combination of electronic diary \[eDiary\] variables). eDiary events are defined by criteria using morning/evening diary variables of PEF, symptoms, and use of rescue medication. A participant was considered to have a CompEx event if they had one or both of an asthma exacerbation or diary event. For participants who did not experience an on-treatment CompEx event, date of censoring was the minimum between the date of last dose + 28 days, and the last day of eDiary recording during the on-treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline to week 16

Population: The ITT population included participant who were randomised and received any study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tozorakimab Dose ANumber of Participants With at Least One Asthma CompEx Event From Baseline to Week 1619 Participants
Tozorakimab Dose BNumber of Participants With at Least One Asthma CompEx Event From Baseline to Week 1615 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With at Least One Asthma CompEx Event From Baseline to Week 1615 Participants
p-value: 0.23980% CI: [0.8, 2]Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.46180% CI: [0.6, 1.7]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Concentration of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) in Exhaled Breath

A standardised single-breath FeNO test was performed to evaluate airway inflammation. Results were based on MMRM on log-transformed change from baseline. Log-transformed change from baseline is calculated as the visit value in log minus the baseline value in log. The results from the model were then back transformed. The model included fixed effects for baseline (in log), background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within subject were considered as repeated measurements.

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Tozorakimab Dose APercent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Concentration of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) in Exhaled Breath-17.429 percent change
Tozorakimab Dose BPercent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Concentration of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) in Exhaled Breath-16.500 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Concentration of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) in Exhaled Breath-5.007 percent change
p-value: 0.02980% CI: [0.791, 0.956]MMRM
p-value: 0.0480% CI: [0.8, 0.966]MMRM
Secondary

Serum Concentrations of Tozorakimab

Tozorakimab serum concentrations were measured using a validated assay method.

Time frame: Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were taken pre-dose (day 1) and at weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: The PK population included participants who received at least one dose of tozorakimab and had at least one detectable serum concentration measurement post-first dose of study intervention. Participants with data available at each time point are presented.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 122673.94 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 121.08
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabPre-doseNA µg/L
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 162742.93 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 128.83
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 42165.82 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 180.17
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 20356.56 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 177.25
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 18939.24 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 367.31
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 2480.36 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 170.34
Tozorakimab Dose ASerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 82680.07 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 113.59
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 24146.67 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 214.16
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabPre-doseNA µg/L
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 118374.15 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 239.89
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 44102.04 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 168.6
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 124646.57 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 153.62
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 165007.93 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 117.76
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 20761.75 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 152.78
Tozorakimab Dose BSerum Concentrations of TozorakimabWeek 84476.11 µg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 109.27
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months

In-clinic spirometry measurements were taken prior to the administration of bronchodilators. Baseline was the last measurement prior to first injection of IP. The LS means, LS mean differences and 80% CIs, and one-sided p-value results were based on MMRM. The model included fixed effects for baseline, visit, treatment, and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions. Visits within participant were considered as repeated measurements. Analysis is presented by the number of asthma exacerbations experienced within the 12 months prior to baseline (1 or ≥ 2 exacerbations in the previous 12 months).

Time frame: Baseline and week 16

Population: Participants in the ITT population with 1 or ≥ 2 exacerbations in the previous 12 months are included in the analysis. The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months1 Exacerbation in Last 12 Months0.188 litresStandard Error 0.065
Tozorakimab Dose AChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months≥ 2 Exacerbations in Last 12 Months0.059 litresStandard Error 0.067
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months1 Exacerbation in Last 12 Months0.042 litresStandard Error 0.07
Tozorakimab Dose BChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months≥ 2 Exacerbations in Last 12 Months0.194 litresStandard Error 0.065
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months1 Exacerbation in Last 12 Months0.165 litresStandard Error 0.062
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Pre-BD FEV1 as Measured in the Study Clinic: Analysis Per Number of Exacerbations in Last 12 Months≥ 2 Exacerbations in Last 12 Months-0.018 litresStandard Error 0.069
Comparison: 1 Exacerbation in Last 12 Monthsp-value: 0.38580% CI: [-0.078, 0.124]MMRM
Comparison: 1 Exacerbation in Last 12 Monthsp-value: 0.0680% CI: [-0.224, -0.022]MMRM
Comparison: ≥ 2 Exacerbation in Last 12 Monthsp-value: 0.18680% CI: [-0.034, 0.187]MMRM
Comparison: ≥ 2 Exacerbation in Last 12 Monthsp-value: 0.00780% CI: [0.102, 0.322]MMRM
Other Pre-specified

Eosinophil Count

The eosinophil count at baseline and week 16 are presented. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to first injection of IP.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: The ITT population included participants who were randomised and received any study intervention. Participants with data available are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tozorakimab Dose AEosinophil CountWeek 160.122 10^9 cells/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 82.9
Tozorakimab Dose AEosinophil CountBaseline0.187 10^9 cells/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 80.4
Tozorakimab Dose BEosinophil CountBaseline0.200 10^9 cells/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 88.4
Tozorakimab Dose BEosinophil CountWeek 160.136 10^9 cells/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 77.6
PlaceboEosinophil CountBaseline0.178 10^9 cells/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 83.3
PlaceboEosinophil CountWeek 160.185 10^9 cells/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 93.2
Comparison: Analysis at Week 16 based on MMRM which included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions.p-value: <0.00180% CI: [0.559, 0.71]MMRM
Comparison: Analysis at Week 16 based on MMRM which included fixed effects for baseline, background medication, geographic region, baseline ICS total daily dose, visit, treatment and the baseline by visit and treatment by visit interactions.p-value: <0.00180% CI: [0.599, 0.76]MMRM

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026