Skip to content

The TriggerHappy Trial

Patient-reported Outcome After Corticoid Injection for Triggerfinger- a Randomized Controlled Study Between Two Injection Procedures and Between Corticoid Injection and Percutaneous Release

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04568993
Acronym
Triggerhappy
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-09-29
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
2028-07-01
Last updated
2026-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Minimally Invasive Surgery, Trigger Finger, Trigger Thumb

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomized multicenterstudy focusing on PROMs after primary corticoid injection for triggerfinger with a comparison of two different injection techniques.

Detailed description

This study aims to compare two different methods of corticosteroid injections in patients with triggerfinger, and to study the effects of these injections by day-to-day self-assessment by the included study persons for four weeks. The patient assess: 1. Pain 2. Motion and 3. Triggering by VAS scale every day for four weeks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREProximal phalangeal level

Injection of methyl prednisone and lidocaine in the tendon sheet at the level of the proximal phalanx

DRUGVolar to the MCP-joint

Injection of methyl prednisone and lidocaine in the tendon sheet volar to the MCP-joint

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• 1. Triggering of one or more fingers and/or impaired active finger motion and/or pain during active finger motion 2. Localized tenderness volar to the MCP joint of the affected finger 3. The patient seeks treatment

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous treatment for triggerfinger in the finger to be treated 2. Impaired function of finger due to previous trauma/infection or other condition 3. Suspicion of other cause than triggeriinger/tendovaginitis 4. Patient not able to follow instructions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain after injectionFour weeksVisual analouge scale (VAS), range 0-10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 "maximum pain"
Impairment of finger motionFour weeksVisual analouge scale (VAS), range 0-10, where 0 indicates "no impairment" and 10 "maximum impairment"
TriggeringFour weeksVisual analouge scale (VAS), range 0-10, where 0 indicates "no trigger phenomenon" and 10 "Trigger phenomenon all the time/ locked finger"

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick-DASHFour weeksgeneric handquestionaire, 11 items, 0 means normal hand function, 100 most impaired function

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 25, 2026