Covid19
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the feasibility and validity of a saliva based home surveillance monitoring test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants will be asked to carry out as many tests as are included in the bag they are provided, on a daily basis until they are used up.
Interventions
Kit including tube with closed reagents using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Enrollment is to a single group. Specific eligibility criteria apply depending on whether the participant is a hospitalized patient, in high-risk or infected population, or low-risk population
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Hospitalized patients * Hospitalized at Stanford Health Care for COVID-related complications and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with a PCR-based test * Able to understand and consent to study and with a clinical trajectory likely to be consistent with multi-day participation * High-risk/positive population * Seeking testing for suspected COVID or a participant in a study of COVID-positive outpatients * Own an internet-enabled phone or device capable of loading web pages, receiving text messages, and taking/uploading photos. * Willing to participate in the study for 6 months * Low-risk population * Own an internet-enabled phone or device capable of loading web pages, receiving text messages, and taking/uploading photos. * Willing to participate in the study for 6 months
Exclusion criteria
* All participants: * Participants with salivary gland dysfunction (including patients with Sjogren's disease or those with xerostomia associated with lupus or rheumatoid arthritis) * Participants will not be eligible if they identify any reason they are unable to participate in the study * High-risk/positive population * Participants who have color blindness * Participants unable to operate the SnapDx device * Low-risk population * Participants with prior confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection * Participants who have color blindness * Participants unable to operate the SnapDx device
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Up to 5 days per participant | Feasibility Outcome. Discrepancy in interpretation of colormetric readout by participant versus by technician via photo. Passed test = void of manufacturing or user error. |
| Number of Positive Home Saliva Tests as Determined by the Patient | Up to 5 days per participant | Validity Outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants That Called Technical Support | Up to 5 days per participant | Feasibility Outcome (ease of use). Number of participants that called technical support, by reason (e.g., processing was not possible due to broken part). |
| Sample Integrity | Up to 5 days per participant | Feasibility Outcome. The participants were asked to determine whether the saliva sample filled up to the indicated line, and if there were bubbles present as a measure of sample integrity. |
| Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Up to 5 days per participant | Validity Outcome (ease of interpretation). Number of participants responding by category when asked to provide a rating on being Confident in Interpreting Results. |
| Specificity of Sample Test Kit | Up to 5 days per participant | Validity Outcome. Analysis of saliva samples provided by participants and run through sample test kit by study lab. Specificity = number of true negatives out of negative tests run. Samples may have been split and run through more than one test. |
| Sensitivity of Sample Test Kit | Up to 5 days per participant | Validity Outcome. Analysis of saliva samples provided by participants and run through sample test kit by study lab. Sensitivity = number of true positives out of the positive tests run. Samples may have been split and run through more than one test. |
| Participant-rated Ease of Use | Up to 5 days per participant | Validity Outcome (ease of use). Number of participants responding by category when asked to provide a rating on SnapDx being Easy to Learn to Use. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
1277 participants signed consent; 353 were allocated to a study arm: participants who came to the study site to collect a kit (First, Second, and Third Distribution groups) or provided saliva samples (Positive Saliva Collection and Negative Saliva Collection groups).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution Participants provide two test samples at home using the saliva test kit to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus. | 94 |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution Participants provide two test samples at home using the saliva test kit to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus. | 112 |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution Participants provide one test sample at study visit using the saliva test kit to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus. | 135 |
| Positive Saliva Collection Participants provide one saliva sample confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus used in lab to validate device function. | 9 |
| Negative Saliva Collection Participants provide one saliva sample confirmed negative for SARS-CoV-2 virus used in lab to validate device function. | 3 |
| Total | 353 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 48 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Saliva Test - First Distribution | Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Positive Saliva Collection | Negative Saliva Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 46.11 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.65 | 38.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8 | 46.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.6 | 52.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 | 23.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 | 24.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.51 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 53 Participants | 23 Participants | 20 Participants | 10 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 293 Participants | 66 Participants | 91 Participants | 124 Participants | 9 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 64 Participants | 13 Participants | 24 Participants | 21 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized More than one race | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 28 Participants | 10 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 234 Participants | 60 Participants | 65 Participants | 103 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 353 participants | 94 participants | 112 participants | 135 participants | 9 participants | 3 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 217 Participants | 42 Participants | 73 Participants | 91 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 136 Participants | 52 Participants | 39 Participants | 44 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 94 | 0 / 112 | 0 / 135 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 3 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 94 | 0 / 112 | 0 / 135 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 3 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 94 | 0 / 112 | 0 / 135 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 3 |
Outcome results
Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability
Feasibility Outcome. Discrepancy in interpretation of colormetric readout by participant versus by technician via photo. Passed test = void of manufacturing or user error.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected from the Saliva Test - First, Second, and Third Distribution groups only. Participants who completed at least one test are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Total passed tests | 52 Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Matching interpretation | 27 Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Total passed tests | 69 Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Matching interpretation | 67 Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Total passed tests | 97 Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Number of Matched Test Colormetric Interpretation as a Measure of Interrater Reliability | Matching interpretation | 93 Completed tests |
Number of Positive Home Saliva Tests as Determined by the Patient
Validity Outcome.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected from the Saliva Test - First, Second, and Third Distribution groups only. Participants who completed at least one test are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Number of Positive Home Saliva Tests as Determined by the Patient | NA Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Number of Positive Home Saliva Tests as Determined by the Patient | NA Completed tests |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Number of Positive Home Saliva Tests as Determined by the Patient | NA Completed tests |
Number of Participants That Called Technical Support
Feasibility Outcome (ease of use). Number of participants that called technical support, by reason (e.g., processing was not possible due to broken part).
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected for this outcome from the Saliva Test - First and Second distribution groups only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Number of Participants That Called Technical Support | 0 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Number of Participants That Called Technical Support | 0 Participants |
Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results
Validity Outcome (ease of interpretation). Number of participants responding by category when asked to provide a rating on being Confident in Interpreting Results.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected for the Third Distribution group only; participants who completed the test are included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Strongly agree | 53 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Agree | 61 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Somewhat agree | 9 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Neither agree nor disagree | 2 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Somewhat disagree | 3 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Disagree | 3 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Confidence in Interpreting Results | Strongly disagree | 0 Participants |
Participant-rated Ease of Use
Validity Outcome (ease of use). Number of participants responding by category when asked to provide a rating on SnapDx being Easy to Learn to Use.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected for the First, Second, and Third distribution groups only; participants who completed the test and responded to the survey question are included in the analysis
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Agree | 6 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Somewhat disagree | 8 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Neither agree nor disagree | 2 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Strongly agree | 0 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Strongly disagree | 3 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Disagree | 3 Participants |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Somewhat agree | 7 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Neither agree nor disagree | 4 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Strongly agree | 5 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Agree | 22 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Somewhat agree | 10 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Somewhat disagree | 12 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Disagree | 6 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Strongly disagree | 5 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Somewhat disagree | 18 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Agree | 52 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Strongly disagree | 0 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Disagree | 5 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Neither agree nor disagree | 4 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Somewhat agree | 39 Participants |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Participant-rated Ease of Use | Strongly agree | 13 Participants |
Sample Integrity
Feasibility Outcome. The participants were asked to determine whether the saliva sample filled up to the indicated line, and if there were bubbles present as a measure of sample integrity.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected from the Saliva Test - First and Third distribution groups only. Participants who completed at least one test are included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Sample Integrity | Sufficient sample | 78 Test samples |
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Sample Integrity | Significant presence of bubbles | 25 Test samples |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Sample Integrity | Significant presence of bubbles | 50 Test samples |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Sample Integrity | Sufficient sample | 131 Test samples |
Sensitivity of Sample Test Kit
Validity Outcome. Analysis of saliva samples provided by participants and run through sample test kit by study lab. Sensitivity = number of true positives out of the positive tests run. Samples may have been split and run through more than one test.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Data were collected from the Validation Saliva Samples group only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Sensitivity of Sample Test Kit | 4 Positive tests run |
Specificity of Sample Test Kit
Validity Outcome. Analysis of saliva samples provided by participants and run through sample test kit by study lab. Specificity = number of true negatives out of negative tests run. Samples may have been split and run through more than one test.
Time frame: Up to 5 days per participant
Population: Specificity analysis includes samples confirmed negative from the First or Second Distribution groups, and samples from the Negative Saliva Collection group only
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Saliva Test - First Distribution | Specificity of Sample Test Kit | 15 Negative tests run |
| Saliva Test - Second Distribution | Specificity of Sample Test Kit | 10 Negative tests run |
| Saliva Test - Third Distribution | Specificity of Sample Test Kit | 25 Negative tests run |