Skip to content

Evaluation of a Daily Disposable Novel Multifocal Contact Lens in a Hyperopic Population

Evaluation of a Daily Disposable Novel Multifocal Contact Lens in a Hyperopic Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04567186
Enrollment
81
Registered
2020-09-28
Start date
2020-09-06
Completion date
2020-11-25
Last updated
2022-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Visual Acuity

Brief summary

This is a 6-visit, subject-masked, multi-site, 2×3 crossover dispensing trial that will last approximately 2 - 4 months.

Interventions

DEVICEInvestigational senofilcon A C3 Multifocal Lens

TEST

DEVICEdelefilcon A Multifocal Lens

Dailies Total 1® Multifocal Contact Lens

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Potential subjects must satisfy all the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 3. The subject must be at least 40 years of age and not greater than 70 years of age at the time of consent. 4. Subjects must own a wearable pair of spectacles if required for their distance vision. 5. The subject must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 6 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration). 6. The subject must either already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or, if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire (Appendix E). 7. The subject's distance spherical equivalent refraction must be in the range of +1.25 D to +3.75 D in each eye. 8. The subject's refractive cylinder must be ≤0.75 D in each eye. 9. The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50 D. 10. The subject must have distance best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

* Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study: 1. Currently pregnant or lactating. 2. Any active or ongoing ocular or systemic allergies that may interfere with contact lens wear. 3. Any active or ongoing systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. This may include, but not be limited to, hyperthyroidism, Sjögren's syndrome, xerophthalmia, acne rosacea, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and immunosuppressive diseases or any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis). 4. Any previous, or planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, lid procedures, cataract surgery, retinal surgery, etc.). 5. A history of amblyopia, strabismus or binocular vision abnormality. 6. Use of any of the following medications within 2 weeks prior to enrollment: oral retinoids, oral tetracyclines, anticholinergics, systemic/topical steroids, oral phenothiazines. See section 9.1 for additional details regarding excluded systemic medications. 7. Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops. 8. History of herpetic keratitis. 9. History of irregular cornea. 10. History of pathological dry eye. 11. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment. 12. Employee or immediate family member of an employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician). 13. Any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to non-preserved rewetting drop solutions or sodium fluorescein. 14. Clinically significant (Grade 2 or greater) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection, or any other corneal or ocular abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear. 15. Entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, dry eye, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions. 16. Any current ocular infection or inflammation. 17. Any current ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)1-Week Follow-upBinocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meters), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) under high lumiance high contrast lighting conditions using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be beetween 7.3 and 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4 meters), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181-208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64 cm) and Near (40cm), the acceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. logMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Overall Vision Scores1- Week Follow-upOverall vision scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 81 subject were enrolled into this study. Of those enrolled, 78 were dispensed at least one study lens while 3 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 70 completed the study while 8 subjects were discontinued.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Dispensed Subjects
All subjects dispensed at least one study lens
78
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1Adverse Event02
Period 1COVID-19 related10
Period 1Protocol Violation01
Period 2COVID-19 Related01
Period 2Lost to Follow-up01
Period 2Protocol Violation01
Period 3Subject no longer meets eligibilty criteria10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Dispensed Subjects
Age, Continuous56.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.84
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
63 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 750 / 77
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 750 / 77
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 750 / 77

Outcome results

Primary

Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)

Binocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meters), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) under high lumiance high contrast lighting conditions using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be beetween 7.3 and 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4 meters), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181-208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64 cm) and Near (40cm), the acceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. logMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.

Time frame: 1-Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary or secondary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)Distance-0.07 logMARStandard Deviation 0.083
TestBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)Intermediate-0.05 logMARStandard Deviation 0.087
TestBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)Near0.07 logMARStandard Deviation 0.102
ControlBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)Near0.08 logMARStandard Deviation 0.095
ControlBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)Distance-0.05 logMARStandard Deviation 0.084
ControlBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)Intermediate-0.04 logMARStandard Deviation 0.08
Comparison: It was calculated that 70 participants would have at least 90% power to for the mean visual performance at each distance to be below the hypothesis threshold at the 1-week follow-up. Sample size was determined using one sample means test for equivalence95% CI: [-0.099, -0.057]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: It was calculated that 70 participants would have at least 90% power to for the mean visual performance at each distance to be below the hypothesis threshold at the 1-week follow-up. Sample size was determined using one sample means test for equivalence95% CI: [-0.079, -0.039]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: It was calculated that 70 participants would have at least 90% power to for the mean visual performance at each distance to be below the hypothesis threshold at the 1-week follow-up. Sample size was determined using one sample means test for equivalence95% CI: [0.04, 0.084]Linear Mixed Model
Secondary

Subjective Overall Vision Scores

Overall vision scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.

Time frame: 1- Week Follow-up

Population: Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary or secondary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TestSubjective Overall Vision Scores53.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
ControlSubjective Overall Vision Scores55.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Comparison: This study was powered to only test primary hypotheses.95% CI: [49.25, 62.61]Linear Mixed Model
Comparison: This study was powered for only the primary hypotheses.95% CI: [-5.893, -0.073]Linear Mixed Model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026