Skip to content

HORIZON: A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of GT005

HORIZON: A Phase II, Open-label, Outcomes-assessor Masked, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of GT005 Administered as a Single Subretinal Injection in Subjects With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04566445
Enrollment
255
Registered
2020-09-28
Start date
2020-09-28
Completion date
2024-06-10
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Dry age-related macular degeneration, Geographic atrophy, Retinal disease, Eye disease, Retinal degeneration, Macular atrophy

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single subretinal injection in subjects with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Detailed description

This was a Phase II, open-label, outcomes-assessor masked, multicenter, randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single-time subretinal injection in subjects with Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Approximately 250 subjects, across Stage 1 and Stage 2, were planned to be randomized to one of two doses of GT005 or the untreated control group. Subjects entered the study had genotyping and serum Complement factor I (CFI) levels assessed either through participation in a previous Gyroscope sponsored study, or a Sponsor-approved laboratory during the HORIZON screening period. If both eyes are eligible; the eye with the worse visual acuity will be selected as the study eye. If subjects failed to meet the eligibility criteria for this study, they were classified as screen failures and could be considered for entry into another Novartis/Gyroscope sponsored study. After providing the informed consent, subjects underwent ophthalmic and clinical assessments to determined eligibility for inclusion in the study. Upon confirmation of eligibility, subjects were randomized to one of two dose groups (medium dose \[5E10 vg\] or high dose \[2E11 vg\]). Within each dose group, subjects were allocated to GT005, or untreated control based on a 2:1 ratio. The overall study population (N=approximately 250) aimed to include approximately 60% of subjects with foveal GA and 40% of subjects with non-foveal GA (extrafoveal lesions). The study eye was identified for all subjects. Enrolment for HORIZON were composed of two stages. Stage 1 enrolled subjects with foveal or non-foveal GA until 180 subjects were randomized. Stage 2 enrolled subjects with nonfoveal GA. Subjects with a CFI rare variant associated with normal or low serum CFI were also allowed to be enrolled in Stage 2, irrespective of GA foveal involvement. Subjects were stratified by GA lesion size on Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) (≤10 mm2 or \>10 mm2) and AMD genotype subgroup. Randomization of study eyes in the GA lesion size upper stratum of \>10 mm2 to 17.5 mm2 was capped at 20% of total subjects randomized in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively. In Stage 2, once enrolment capping at 20% based on upper GA lesion size was reached, eyes that fulfilled the cap criteria were no longer eligible, unless the subject had a CFI rare variant genotype (minor allele frequency ≤1%) previously associated with normal or low serum CFI or had an unreported CFI rare variant genotype (Group 1 and 5). A permuted-block method was used to obtain an approximately 2:1 ratio between GT005 and the untreated control groups for each dose group within each stratum. Following randomization, the Investigator was informed of the subject's allocated treatment (GT005 or the untreated control group) and the study eye selected. To minimize bias during imaging grading, all imaging endpoint assessments and grading were performed at a Central reading centre (CRC). All imaging efficacy assessments were performed in a masked fashion. The Sponsor, subjects, investigators, and study personnel performing clinical assessments remained masked to the dose received for those allocated to GT005. For each subject, the study comprised of a screening period lasting up to 8 weeks (or up to 12 weeks if agreed by the Sponsor Medical Monitor) followed by a 96-week study period. All subjects were assessed for the occurrence of AEs at each visit and underwent functional assessments, retinal imaging, and biological sampling as per the schedule of assessments. This study was conducted in compliance with Independent ethics committees (IECs) / Institutional review boards (IRBs), informed consent regulations, the Declaration of Helsinki, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 11, Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures, and FDA, Guidance for Industry: Computerised Systems Used in Clinical Trials. On 24-Aug-2023, the decision was taken to terminate the study and the GT005 program. The decision was aligned with the recommendation of an independent Data monitoring committee (DMC), which concluded that futility criteria had been met for the HORIZON study (GT005-03) and the overall benefit-risk ratio did not support continuation of the current development program as planned. All GT005- treated subjects, who were willing to be transferred into the long-term safety follow-up study were enrolled in the ORACLE (CPPY988A12203B) study.

Interventions

DRUGGT005

GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI). GT005 was administered as a single time subretinal injection into the study eye of subjects allocated to one of the two GT005 doses.

Sponsors

Gyroscope Therapeutics Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcome Assessor). The overall objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy (anatomical and functional visual outcomes) of two doses of GT005 in genetically defined subjects with GA due to AMD.

Intervention model description

This is a Phase II, open-label, outcomes-assessor masked, multicentre, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single subretinal injection in subjects with GA secondary to AMD.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able and willing to give written informed consent 2. Age ≥55 years 3. a. In Stage 1: Have a clinical diagnosis of GA secondary to AMD in the study eye, as determined by the Investigator, and a diagnosis of AMD in the contralateral eye; b. In Stage 2: Have a clinical diagnosis of GA secondary to AMD in the study eye, as determined by the Investigator, that is non-foveal, as determined by the central reading centre, or has a CFI rare variant genotype and meets inclusion criteria 3a, and a diagnosis of AMD in the contralateral eye (except if monocular) 4. GA lesion(s) within an acceptable size on FAF, in the study eye 5. The GA lesion in the study eye must reside completely within the FAF image 6. Up to 25% of the enrolled study population are permitted to have CNV in the fellow eye 7. Have a BCVA of ≥24 letters (6/95 or 20/320 Snellen acuity equivalent), using ETDRS charts, in the study eye 8. a. In Stage 1: Meet one of the pre-specified AMD genetic subgroup criteria; b. In Stage 2: Genotyping is not required for study eligibility 9. Able to attend all study visits and complete the study procedures 10. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to randomisation (not required for postmenopausal women) or provide documentation of being surgically sterilised

Exclusion criteria

1. a. In Stage 1: Carriers of excluded genetic variants; b. In Stage 2: Subjects are excluded if they have a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt Disease or other retinal dystrophies 2. Have a history, or evidence, of CNV in the study eye 3. Presence of moderate/severe or worse non-proliferative, diabetic retinopathy in the study eye 4. Have history of vitrectomy, sub-macular surgery, or macular photocoagulation in the study eye 5. History of intraocular surgery in the study eye within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1 6. Have clinically significant cataract that may require surgery during the study period in the study eye 7. Presence of moderate to severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy, uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP), despite use of two or more topical agents; or a history of glaucoma-filtering or valve surgery 8. Axial myopia of greater than -8 diopters in the study eye 9. Have received any investigational product for the treatment of GA within the past 6 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer), other than nutritional supplements such as the age-related eye disease study (AREDS) formula 10. Have received a gene or cell therapy at any time. 11. Have a contraindication to the protocol specified corticosteroid regimen 12. Are unwilling to use two forms of contraception (one of which being a barrier method) for 90 days post-dosing, if relevant 13. Active malignancy within the past 12 months, except for appropriately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, or prostate cancer with a stable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 12 months 14. Have any other significant ocular or non-ocular medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the subject at risk or may influence the results of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72GA area as measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change From Baseline at Week 96 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Baseline, Week 96GA area as measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF)
Summary of Adverse EventsAdverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.
Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeAdverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs. System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.
Non-ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of SubjectsAdverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.
Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceBaseline, Weeks 5, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96Change in retinal morphology on multimodal imaging. For the untreated control group, there were no protocol-specified visits at Week 5.
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartBaseline, Weeks 1, 5, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning. For the untreated control group, there were no protocol-specified visits for Weeks 1, 5 and 8.
Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96LLD was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. The test was to be performed after BCVA testing, prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction was to be carried out before Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) was measured. LLVA was to be measured by placing a 2.0-log-unit neutral density filter over the front of each eye and having the subject read the normally illuminated ETDRS chart. The LLD was calculated as the difference between BCVA and LLVA. Initially, letters were to be read at a distance of 4 metres from the chart. If \<20 letters were read at 4 metres, testing at 1 metre should have been performed. LLD was to be reported as number of letters read correctly by the subject. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.
Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96The maximum reading speed (MRS) represents the highest reading speed an individual can achieve when print size is not a limiting factor. Essentially, it measures how quickly a person can read text when the print is large enough to be easily readable. A higher count represents better visual functioning.
Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexBaseline, Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96The FRI index is a patient-reported outcome measure developed specifically for use in GA patients. The FRI index evaluates the level of independence subjects have in performing everyday activities that require reading, such as writing a cheque or reading a prescription. Scores derived from the index range from 1 (unable to do) to 4 (total independence). A higher score represents better visual functioning.
Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreBaseline, Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.

Countries

Australia, France, Germany, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a 3-arm study conducted in 2 stages. Results are reported per the 3 treatment arms. Stage 1 and Stage 2 results were combined since the study population and study treatments were the same in both Stage 1 and Stage 2; In Stage 1, participants were enrolled with both foveal and non-foveal geographic atrophy and in Stage 2, participants were enrolled with non-foveal geographic atrophy to enrich the number of participants with non-foveal geographic atrophy.

Pre-assignment details

The study design with 3 arms was the same for both Stage 1 and 2. Analysis was performed following the statistical analysis plan to combine Stage 1 and 2 results, and to report results per the 3 unique treatment arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]
GT005 Medium dose \[5E10 vg\]
87
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]
GT005 High dose \[2E11 vg\]
86
Untreated Control
Untreated control
82
Total255

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Untreated ControlTotal
Age, Continuous77.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.33
77.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
77.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.83
77.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.24
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
87 Participants80 Participants80 Participants247 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants61 Participants53 Participants166 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants25 Participants29 Participants89 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 871 / 861 / 826 / 255
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 8775 / 8650 / 82201 / 255
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 8725 / 8610 / 8257 / 255

Outcome results

Primary

The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)

GA area as measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 24 (n=72,75,71)1.151 mm^2Standard Error 0.0833
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 12 (n=75,71,72)0.730 mm^2Standard Error 0.0625
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 36 (n=66,66,71)1.728 mm^2Standard Error 0.1488
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 72 (n=56,51,54)3.225 mm^2Standard Error 0.2337
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 48 (n=64,68,65)2.098 mm^2Standard Error 0.1841
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 72 (n=56,51,54)3.421 mm^2Standard Error 0.2369
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 12 (n=75,71,72)0.752 mm^2Standard Error 0.0634
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 24 (n=72,75,71)1.260 mm^2Standard Error 0.0831
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 36 (n=66,66,71)1.955 mm^2Standard Error 0.1503
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 48 (n=64,68,65)2.535 mm^2Standard Error 0.1853
Untreated ControlThe Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 36 (n=66,66,71)1.531 mm^2Standard Error 0.1528
Untreated ControlThe Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 12 (n=75,71,72)0.667 mm^2Standard Error 0.0647
Untreated ControlThe Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 72 (n=56,51,54)2.919 mm^2Standard Error 0.2412
Untreated ControlThe Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 24 (n=72,75,71)1.054 mm^2Standard Error 0.086
Untreated ControlThe Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)Week 48 (n=64,68,65)2.047 mm^2Standard Error 0.1896
Comparison: Week 1290% CI: [-0.087, 0.211]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 1290% CI: [-0.066, 0.234]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 2490% CI: [-0.102, 0.294]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 2490% CI: [0.007, 0.404]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 3690% CI: [-0.155, 0.55]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 3690% CI: [0.068, 0.779]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 4890% CI: [-0.385, 0.489]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 4890% CI: [0.049, 0.928]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 7290% CI: [-0.248, 0.862]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 7290% CI: [-0.058, 1.063]mixed model repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) Index

The FRI index is a patient-reported outcome measure developed specifically for use in GA patients. The FRI index evaluates the level of independence subjects have in performing everyday activities that require reading, such as writing a cheque or reading a prescription. Scores derived from the index range from 1 (unable to do) to 4 (total independence). A higher score represents better visual functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 72 (n=63,69,58)-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 24 (n=77,75,67)-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 36 (n=74,72,66)-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.64
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 48 (n=70,73,65)-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 96 (n=54,51,32)-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.57
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 36 (n=74,72,66)-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 96 (n=54,51,32)-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.41
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 48 (n=70,73,65)-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.87
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 72 (n=63,69,58)-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.19
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 24 (n=77,75,67)-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.74
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 24 (n=77,75,67)-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 36 (n=74,72,66)-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.67
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 72 (n=63,69,58)-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.37
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 96 (n=54,51,32)-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.11
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) IndexWeek 48 (n=70,73,65)-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite Score

The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 72 (n=63,69,54)-4.232 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6259
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 48 (n=70,74,65)-2.501 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9563
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 24 (n=77,78,67)-1.466 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8742
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 36 (n=74,73,66)-1.955 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.506
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 96 (n=54,51,33)-6.341 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4187
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 48 (n=70,74,65)-3.113 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9974
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 24 (n=77,78,67)-2.289 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3295
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 36 (n=74,73,66)-3.479 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.0848
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 72 (n=63,69,54)-3.432 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.384
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 96 (n=54,51,33)-7.718 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9016
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 96 (n=54,51,33)-6.804 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4812
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 72 (n=63,69,54)-6.583 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5133
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 24 (n=77,78,67)-1.270 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2063
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 48 (n=70,74,65)-4.403 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2465
Untreated ControlChange From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite ScoreWeek 36 (n=74,73,66)-2.273 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2395
Secondary

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) Chart

BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning. For the untreated control group, there were no protocol-specified visits for Weeks 1, 5 and 8.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 5, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 1 (n=81,78,0)-2.0 Letters readStandard Error 1.54
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 5 (n=81,78,0)-0.8 Letters readStandard Error 0.88
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 8 (n=79,77,0)-0.1 Letters readStandard Error 0.85
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 12 (n=79,79,73)-1.1 Letters readStandard Error 0.91
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 24 (n=78,78,71)-2.7 Letters readStandard Error 1.03
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 36 (75,74,72)-2.5 Letters readStandard Error 1.24
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 48 (n=73,75,69)-2.6 Letters readStandard Error 1.48
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 72 (n=63, 70, 58)-4.1 Letters readStandard Error 1.54
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 96 (n=54,51,35)-5.5 Letters readStandard Error 1.78
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 72 (n=63, 70, 58)-7.9 Letters readStandard Error 1.5
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 24 (n=78,78,71)-6.3 Letters readStandard Error 1.03
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 1 (n=81,78,0)-7.0 Letters readStandard Error 1.56
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 48 (n=73,75,69)-7.3 Letters readStandard Error 1.46
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 5 (n=81,78,0)-3.3 Letters readStandard Error 0.89
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 8 (n=79,77,0)-1.7 Letters readStandard Error 0.86
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 96 (n=54,51,35)-10.0 Letters readStandard Error 1.78
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 12 (n=79,79,73)-2.5 Letters readStandard Error 0.91
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 36 (75,74,72)-7.7 Letters readStandard Error 1.25
Untreated ControlChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 24 (n=78,78,71)-1.1 Letters readStandard Error 1.09
Untreated ControlChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 72 (n=63, 70, 58)-8.8 Letters readStandard Error 1.61
Untreated ControlChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 48 (n=73,75,69)-5.3 Letters readStandard Error 1.54
Untreated ControlChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 36 (75,74,72)-3.0 Letters readStandard Error 1.3
Untreated ControlChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 96 (n=54,51,35)-12.7 Letters readStandard Error 2.02
Untreated ControlChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 12 (n=79,79,73)-0.7 Letters readStandard Error 0.96
Comparison: Week 1290% CI: [-2.6, 1.7]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 1290% CI: [-4, 0.4]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 2490% CI: [-4.1, 0.8]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 2490% CI: [-7.7, -2.8]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 3690% CI: [-2.5, 3.5]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 3690% CI: [-7.7, -1.7]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 4890% CI: [-0.9, 6.1]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 4890% CI: [-5.6, 1.4]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 7290% CI: [1, 8.4]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 7290% CI: [-2.8, 4.5]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 9690% CI: [2.7, 11.6]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 9690% CI: [-1.8, 7.1]mixed model repeated measures
Secondary

Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus Autofluorescence

Change in retinal morphology on multimodal imaging. For the untreated control group, there were no protocol-specified visits at Week 5.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 5, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 72 (n=61, 62,59)60 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 24 (n=75,78,72)72 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 96 (n=52,49, 34)50 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 5 (n=23,24,0)23 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 12 (n=75,73,74)74 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 36 (n=70,70, 71)66 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 48 (n=67,72,68)67 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 5 (n=23,24,0)23 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 72 (n=61, 62,59)60 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 48 (n=67,72,68)71 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 36 (n=70,70, 71)69 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 96 (n=52,49, 34)48 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 12 (n=75,73,74)73 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 24 (n=75,78,72)78 Participants
Untreated ControlChange in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 96 (n=52,49, 34)33 Participants
Untreated ControlChange in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 12 (n=75,73,74)73 Participants
Untreated ControlChange in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 24 (n=75,78,72)71 Participants
Untreated ControlChange in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 36 (n=70,70, 71)70 Participants
Untreated ControlChange in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 48 (n=67,72,68)68 Participants
Untreated ControlChange in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus AutofluorescenceWeek 72 (n=61, 62,59)56 Participants
Secondary

Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) Chart

LLD was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts. The test was to be performed after BCVA testing, prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction was to be carried out before Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) was measured. LLVA was to be measured by placing a 2.0-log-unit neutral density filter over the front of each eye and having the subject read the normally illuminated ETDRS chart. The LLD was calculated as the difference between BCVA and LLVA. Initially, letters were to be read at a distance of 4 metres from the chart. If \<20 letters were read at 4 metres, testing at 1 metre should have been performed. LLD was to be reported as number of letters read correctly by the subject. Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 12-0.6 Letters readStandard Deviation 7.59
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 24 (n=78,75,71)-0.6 Letters readStandard Deviation 10.1
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 36 (n=75,72,71)0.0 Letters readStandard Deviation 9.9
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 48 (n=73,73,69)-0.5 Letters readStandard Deviation 10.31
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 72 (n=63,67,58)-0.5 Letters readStandard Deviation 13.15
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 96 (n=54,49,35)-3.1 Letters readStandard Deviation 16.11
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 96 (n=54,49,35)-2.2 Letters readStandard Deviation 13.48
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 12-1.1 Letters readStandard Deviation 9.63
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 48 (n=73,73,69)-1.5 Letters readStandard Deviation 15.18
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 72 (n=63,67,58)-5.2 Letters readStandard Deviation 17.24
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 24 (n=78,75,71)-2.5 Letters readStandard Deviation 12.73
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 36 (n=75,72,71)-2.6 Letters readStandard Deviation 13.4
Untreated ControlChange in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 24 (n=78,75,71)0.5 Letters readStandard Deviation 12.01
Untreated ControlChange in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 36 (n=75,72,71)-0.1 Letters readStandard Deviation 11.12
Untreated ControlChange in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 96 (n=54,49,35)-5.9 Letters readStandard Deviation 16.82
Untreated ControlChange in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 48 (n=73,73,69)-0.4 Letters readStandard Deviation 12.93
Untreated ControlChange in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 121.2 Letters readStandard Deviation 9.51
Untreated ControlChange in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) ChartWeek 72 (n=63,67,58)-2.5 Letters readStandard Deviation 14.93
Secondary

Non-ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

Population: Full Analysis Set - all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Non-ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects63 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Non-ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects59 Participants
Untreated ControlNon-ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects44 Participants
Secondary

Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs. System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

Population: Full Analysis Set - all randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal tear5 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Intraocular pressure increased1 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal detachment2 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Dry eye4 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeSubjects with at least one event66 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract nuclear3 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Posterior capsule opacification3 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctival haemorrhage18 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous floaters3 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Anterior chamber cell4 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeInvestigations11 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Choroidal neovascularisation2 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye irritation6 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Iritis4 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous haemorrhage2 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal haemorrhage8 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract21 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Foreign body sensation in eyes3 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pain5 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeEye disorders65 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pruritus1 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Ocular hypertension6 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Visual impairment2 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diplopia4 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Punctate keratitis6 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal pigmentation12 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Corneal oedema1 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Iritis1 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeSubjects with at least one event65 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeEye disorders62 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract20 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal pigmentation22 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctival haemorrhage12 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal haemorrhage10 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pain7 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Ocular hypertension6 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Punctate keratitis6 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal tear6 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Dry eye4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Posterior capsule opacification4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Anterior chamber cell4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye irritation2 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous haemorrhage6 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Choroidal neovascularisation3 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous floaters4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract nuclear3 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal detachment4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Corneal oedema4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diplopia1 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pruritus4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Foreign body sensation in eyes2 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Visual impairment3 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeInvestigations2 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Intraocular pressure increased2 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal tear0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeSubjects with at least one event15 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal detachment0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Punctate keratitis0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Visual impairment0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Corneal oedema0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Ocular hypertension0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeEye disorders14 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Diplopia0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pain0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Intraocular pressure increased0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye pruritus0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal haemorrhage2 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study EyeInvestigations0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Foreign body sensation in eyes0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Eye irritation0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Conjunctival haemorrhage1 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous haemorrhage0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Anterior chamber cell0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Retinal pigmentation0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Choroidal neovascularisation2 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Posterior capsule opacification2 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Iritis0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Vitreous floaters0 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Dry eye1 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract3 Participants
Untreated ControlOcular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye-Cataract nuclear0 Participants
Secondary

Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study Eye

The maximum reading speed (MRS) represents the highest reading speed an individual can achieve when print size is not a limiting factor. Essentially, it measures how quickly a person can read text when the print is large enough to be easily readable. A higher count represents better visual functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 72 (n=57,64,53)-24.485 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 45.8525
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 48 (n=69,67,62)-20.734 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 36.411
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 24 (n=73,72,65)-15.756 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 32.7268
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 36 (n=71,70,65)-18.488 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 54.7913
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 96 (n=48,47,29)-24.678 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 44.7777
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 48 (n=69,67,62)-6.678 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 49.0844
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 24 (n=73,72,65)-12.368 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 43.2054
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 36 (n=71,70,65)-15.673 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 31.7802
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 72 (n=57,64,53)-20.798 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 39.6796
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 96 (n=48,47,29)-25.178 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 39.7216
Untreated ControlReading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 96 (n=48,47,29)-19.242 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 45.0703
Untreated ControlReading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 72 (n=57,64,53)-26.121 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 40.8016
Untreated ControlReading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 24 (n=73,72,65)-15.769 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 40.5051
Untreated ControlReading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 48 (n=69,67,62)-17.297 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 56.8547
Untreated ControlReading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study EyeWeek 36 (n=71,70,65)-3.689 Words read per minuteStandard Deviation 94.1057
Secondary

Summary of Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject. A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

Time frame: Adverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

Population: Full Analysis Set - all randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event for the study eye66 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsDeaths4 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to study procedure0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event for the fellow eye32 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event for the fellow eye0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to study procedure for the study eye8 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event63 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event related to study procedure for the study eye1 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to surgical procedure0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to study treatment for the study eye13 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event related to study treatment for the study eye0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to surgical procedure for the study eye48 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to study treatment0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event (SAE) for the study eye2 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to study procedure0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular SAE related to surgical procedure for the study eye1 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event of special interest for the fellow eye3 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular SAE leading to study discontinuation for the study eye0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to study treatment0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event of special interest for the study eye19 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event leading to study discontinuation5 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event20 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event leading to study discontinuation5 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to surgical procedure0 Participants
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event leading to study discontinuation for the study eye0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event related to study treatment for the study eye0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to study treatment0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular SAE related to surgical procedure for the study eye4 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to surgical procedure0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event related to study procedure for the study eye1 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to study procedure0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular SAE leading to study discontinuation for the study eye0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event leading to study discontinuation2 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsDeaths1 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event for the study eye65 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event for the fellow eye35 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event59 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to study treatment for the study eye21 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to study treatment0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to surgical procedure for the study eye48 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to surgical procedure0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to study procedure for the study eye9 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to study procedure2 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event leading to study discontinuation for the study eye0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event leading to study discontinuation2 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event of special interest for the study eye31 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event of special interest for the fellow eye3 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event (SAE) for the study eye5 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event for the fellow eye0 Participants
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]Summary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event22 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to surgical procedure0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to study procedure0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsDeaths1 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to study treatment0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event leading to study discontinuation for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event for the fellow eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event leading to study discontinuation1 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular SAE leading to study discontinuation for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular SAE related to surgical procedure for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event of special interest for the study eye3 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event related to study procedure0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event related to study treatment for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event of special interest for the fellow eye1 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to study treatment0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to study treatment for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event related to study procedure for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to surgical procedure for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event44 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular serious adverse event10 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one non-ocular adverse event related to surgical procedure0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event for the fellow eye14 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular serious adverse event (SAE) for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event related to study procedure for the study eye0 Participants
Untreated ControlSummary of Adverse EventsSubjects with at least one ocular adverse event for the study eye15 Participants
Secondary

The Change From Baseline at Week 96 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)

GA area as measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

Time frame: Baseline, Week 96

Population: Full Analysis Set - for participants with a valid measurement without a protocol deviation with impact.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
GT005 Medium Dose [5E10 vg]The Change From Baseline at Week 96 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)4.414 mm2Standard Error 0.3109
GT005 High Dose [2E11 vg]The Change From Baseline at Week 96 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)4.607 mm2Standard Error 0.3167
Untreated ControlThe Change From Baseline at Week 96 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)3.769 mm2Standard Error 0.3286
Comparison: Week 9690% CI: [-0.103, 1.393]mixed model repeated measures
Comparison: Week 9690% CI: [0.081, 1.594]mixed model repeated measures

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026