Skip to content

Comparison of Intubation Rate of Macintosh Size 2 and 3 Blades in Asian Female: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Comparison of Intubation Rate of Macintosh Size 2 and 3 Blades in Asian Female: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04566224
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-09-28
Start date
2011-06-01
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2020-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation;Difficult

Keywords

Intubation rate, Macintosh blade, Asian women, intubation difficulty scale

Brief summary

Direct laryngoscope is a standard equipment for endotracheal intubation. To identify the differences between Macintosh size 3 and 2 blades, we will analysis the data collected from airway and intubation condition.

Detailed description

Selection the most appropriate size of laryngoscope blade size could not only increased intubation successful rate at the first time but also decrease the incidence of tissue trauma. Laryngoscope blade used in daily practice is usually Macintosh 3. However, compared with Caucasian people, Asian people are smaller and thinner especially in women. This study aims to confirm that the Macintosh 2 blade is not inferior to size 3 blade in laryngeal view and intubation rate. Female patients without known difficult airway will be enrolled and allocated into Macintosh blade size 2 and size 3 groups. The age, body weight, body height, Mallampati classification, mouth opening, thyromental distance, neck circumference, intubation time, Cormack-Lehane grade, intubation difficulty scale scores and associated teeth or tissue traumas will be recorded.

Interventions

DEVICEMacintosh size 2 blade

intubate with Macintosh size 2 blade

DEVICEMacintosh size 3 blade

intubate with Macintosh size 3 blade

Sponsors

Mackay Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification 1, 2, or 3 * undergo elective surgery * receive endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* with known difficult airway (i.e. pathology of the neck, upper airway or alimentary tracts) * with risks of pulmonary aspiration (i.e. emergent operation, pregnancy or inadequate nil per os) * with previous difficult intubation history * intubation attempts more than three times * patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation time0-10 minutes during inductionTime from laryngoscope insertion to the first adequate lung insufflation
Cormack-Lehane grade0-10 minutes during inductionClassification of glottis view during intubation
Intubation difficulty scale scores0-10 minutes during inductionScoring system to assess the difficulty of intubation in each patient
Tissue trauma0-10 minutes during inductionAny tissue trauma event related to intubation
Teeth trauma0-10 minutes during inductionAny dental damage event related to intubation

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026