Skip to content

Hand Assistive Rehabilitation Orthotic Device Effectiveness Study

Hand Assistive Rehabilitation Orthotic Device Effectiveness Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04565639
Enrollment
3
Registered
2020-09-25
Start date
2019-08-14
Completion date
2019-11-07
Last updated
2020-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthoses, Prostheses

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate pinch strength improvements and improvements in coordination and functional ability. Pinch strength measurements are made on subjects both with and without the device to evaluate the potential improvements. Also, coordination and functional testing is performed both with and without the device to compare performance under both conditions and evaluate potential improvement.

Detailed description

This study tests the powered hand orthosis device on a small number of participants (up to 6). Research participants with neuromusculoskeletal impairments were recruited for the study and consented with an approved protocol. The study was conducted during 1 visit to LTI in Holliston, MA . The study consists of several assessments. Participants are surveyed for cognitive limitations and self-assessment of difficulties in completing tasks of daily living by completing surveys such as the Quickdash Questionnaire \[1\], the Mini-Mental State test \[2\], and the McGann Feedback form \[3\]. Pinch strength without and with the powered orthosis is evaluated. A selection of functional outcome measures are performed such as the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) \[4\], the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHP) \[5\], and the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) \[6\].

Interventions

DEVICEPowered Hand Orthosis

A prototype powered hand orthosis system designed to improve grip strength and improve ability to perform tasks of daily living.

Sponsors

Liberating Technologies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participants in this study must meet the following inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

. * Subjects diagnosed with one of these conditions- ALS, brachial plexus injuries, CVA hemiplegia, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury * Range of motion (ROM) and strength characterized by one of the following limitations: * Range of motion within functional limits (as determined by our OT consultant Deb Latour), but with limited pinch strength measured by a pinch meter of less than 2 pounds or manual muscle test grade of 3. * Limited range of motion of the wrist, thumb, index, and middle fingers as determined by a clinical occupational therapist * Passive ROM within functional limits as determined by our OT consultant Deb Latour * No tremors in the hand or arm * Must be able to understand and follow up to 3 step directions for testing * No other comorbidities that may affect their ability to use the device * Modified Ashworth Scale assessment for spasticity of less than 2 * Greater than 18 years old * Must be able to wear a powered hand orthosis device. * Be able to make the required visit(s) to LTI for testing * Mini-mental test \[2\] score greater than 18

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained grip strength1 minuteThe sustained grip available for achieving activities of daily living that require a sustained grip

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Grip Strength10 secondsThe maximum strength available for achieving activities of daily living
Accomplishing activities of daily living10 minutesSubjects were tested to accomplish a number of activities of daily living both with and without the device. Initial activities included the SHAP protocol and other activities that were identified by our occupational therapist consultant as relevant to the device.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026