Skip to content

A Study Evaluating the Clinical Outcome of a Modified d'Hoore Technique for Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy

A Prospective Study Evaluating the Clinical Outcome of a Modified d'Hoore Technique for Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04564677
Acronym
POP-01
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-09-25
Start date
2021-02-08
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enterocele, Rectal Prolapse, Rectocele

Brief summary

The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of a modified d'Hoore technique for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in patients with primary rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele.The goal of the study will be achieved by reporting the peri- and postoperative complications ((serious) adverse events), recurrences and re-interventions. Pre-operative to postoperative changes in pain, functional outcome and quality of life will be evaluated as well.

Interventions

DEVICEIfabond (Péters surgical)

Ifabond (Péters surgical) is a CE-marked synthetic surgical glue for internal and external use. The glue is non-toxic, biocompatible and biodegradable. It is commercially available and can be used for mesh fixation, as tissue adhesive, for sealing of sutured tissue and for hemostasis.

Sponsors

Duomed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients. * Patient ≥ 18 years of age at study entry. * Patient and investigator signed and dated the informed consent form prior to the index-procedure. * Patient with primary rectal prolapse (grades I to V according to the Oxford scale), rectocele and/or enterocele.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is unable / unwilling to provide informed consent. * Patient with recurrent rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele. * Patient is unable to comply with the study protocol or proposed follow-up visits. * Patient has a contra-indication for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural efficacy - Number of participants with (serious) adverse eventsDuring procedureNumber of participants with (serious) adverse events ≥ grade II Clavien-Dindo
Procedural efficacy - Conversion rate to laparotomy during the index procedureDuring procedureNumber of conversions to laparotomy during the index procedure
Procedural efficacy - Number of re-interventionsAt discharge (assessed up to 1 week)Number of re-interventions
Procedural efficacy - Number of post-operative recurrencesFollow-up 1: 6 - 10 weeks after the procedureNumber of post-operative recurrences

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life - Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ)At baselineThe BBUSQ is a 22-item questionnaire to record data on 4 domains: constipation, evacuation, incontinence and urinary symptoms. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms.
Pre-operative abdominal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)At baselineAssessment of pre-operative abdominal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Post-operative vaginal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Follow-up 1: 6 - 10 weeks after the procedureAssessment of post-operative vaginal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Post-operative abdominal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Follow-up 1: 6 - 10 weeks after the procedureAssessment of post-operative abdominal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Pre-operative vaginal pain by means of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)At baselineAssessment of pre-operative vaginal pain by means of the VAS, which contains a 0 to 100 grading scale with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain.
Functional score - Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) scoreAt baselineThe ODS score is obtained by means of a structured 8-item questionnaire on multiple bowel symptoms. The cumulative score for all answers ranges from 0 to 31, with higher scores being indicative of more severe symptoms.
Functional score - Cleveland Clinical Incontinence Score (CCIS)At baselineThe CCIS is a 5-item questionnaire used to score the level of fecal incontinence. The cumulative score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores being indicative of more severe symptoms.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactStephanie De Munter, PhD
stephanie.de.munter@archerresearch.eu+32 (0)11 28 69 48
Backup ContactAnne Dams, MD
anne.dams@zol.be+32 (0)89 32 60 20

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026