Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up

Clinical Assessment Accourding to Modified Usphsof Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04563624

Enrollment

Registered

2020-09-24

Start date

2020-10-01

Completion date

2021-11-01

Last updated

2020-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Teeth Restoration

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare one-year clinical performance of indirect restoration fabricated from nano hybrid composite CAD CAM blocks and ceramic blocks

Detailed description

This research is conducted for comparing the clinical efficacy of nano hybrid composite blocks and ceramic blocks ., the choice of nano hybrid composite blocks based on the claim of the manufacturer, as it's considered to be promising , nano hybrid composite blocks has the highest fillers content (86% by weight), resembles natural teeth perfectly , Excellent physical values for flexural strength and abrasion, No firing required (a real one step ), can be processed using any conventional milling unit, can be finished and polished optimally, Ideal for grinding even in cases with thin edges.

Interventions

DRUGcomposite blocks

cad cam composite blocks

DRUGceramic cad cam blocks

ceramic cad cam blocks

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

16 Years to 65 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with badly broken vital teeth * Young adult Males or female * Good oral hygiene measures * Cooperative patients approving to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a compromised medical history. * Severe or active periodontal disease * Severe medical complications * Lack of compliance * Endodontically treated teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
marginal integrity	one year	using usphs visual inspection

Contacts

Primary ContactHANEEN ELMOSELHY, mastrers

haneen.elmoselhy@bue.edu.eg01003778829

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026