Skip to content

Acute Coronary Syndrome KCMC

Community and Physician Perceptions of Chest Pain and Prevalence of Acute Coronary Syndrome Among HIV-infected and -Uninfected Patients in Moshi, Tanzania

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04563546
Enrollment
641
Registered
2020-09-24
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-10-01
Last updated
2025-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop a quality improvement intervention to address barriers to evidence-based acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care in northern Tanzania. Patients who presented to Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center (KCMC) will be asked to complete a survey about barriers and facilitators of health care. In addition the survey will be administered to all providers, policymakers, and administrators participating in in-depth interviews. Data from this survey will be used to develop a quality improvement intervention that will be piloted by KCMC staff. Six months after the pilot program is implemented providers, patients, and administrators will be interviewed for their perspectives on the program.

Interventions

OTHERQuality Improvement

A quality improvement intervention including reminders, care protocols, and text messages to improve care of myocardial infarction in the KCMC ED

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older * symptoms related to acute coronary syndrome * myocardial infarction * clinically sober * able to communicate in Swahili or English

Exclusion criteria

* medically unstable * have a deteriorating condiction * too critically ill to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability as Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)Initial ED visit (baseline)The AIM tool is a 4-question survey that evaluates the acceptability of an intervention. Responses to each question are on a 5-point Likert Scale (Strongly Agree=5, Agree=4, Neutral=3, Disagree=2, Strongly Disagree=1). Responses of Strongly Agree (5) and Agree (4) are considered to indicate a more acceptable intervention. The responses to each question will be averaged together to give an acceptability score between 1 and 5 for each respondent. The primary outcome will be the overall mean acceptability score among respondents. A mean acceptability score \>= 4 will be considered to indicate acceptability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Presenting With Chest Pain or Shortness of Breath Who Undergo ECG and Cardiac Biomarker Testing During Their ED StayInitial ED visit (baseline)
Survival of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) at 30 Days After Enrollment30 days after enrollmentNumber of participants with ACS who have survived at 30 days
Number of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Taking Aspirin at BaselineInitial ED visit (baseline)
Number of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Taking Aspirin 30 Days After Enrollment30 days after enrollment

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Myocardial Infarction (MI) Patients in Northern Tanzania
Patients presenting to KCMC (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center) emergency department with acute MI Quality Improvement: A quality improvement intervention including reminders, care protocols, and text messages to improve care of myocardial infarction in the KCMC ED
577
Providers in the KCMC Emergency Department
Providers in the KCMC (Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center) Emergency Department
64
Total641

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMyocardial Infarction (MI) Patients in Northern TanzaniaTotalProviders in the KCMC Emergency Department
Age, Continuous62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
577 Participants641 Participants64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
577 Participants641 Participants64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Tanzania
577 Participants641 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
304 Participants327 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
273 Participants314 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
163 / 5770 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5770 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5770 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability as Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

The AIM tool is a 4-question survey that evaluates the acceptability of an intervention. Responses to each question are on a 5-point Likert Scale (Strongly Agree=5, Agree=4, Neutral=3, Disagree=2, Strongly Disagree=1). Responses of Strongly Agree (5) and Agree (4) are considered to indicate a more acceptable intervention. The responses to each question will be averaged together to give an acceptability score between 1 and 5 for each respondent. The primary outcome will be the overall mean acceptability score among respondents. A mean acceptability score \>= 4 will be considered to indicate acceptability.

Time frame: Initial ED visit (baseline)

Population: The AIM was assessed among KCMC ED providers.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Providers in the KCMC Emergency DepartmentAcceptability as Measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)4.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Number of Participants Presenting With Chest Pain or Shortness of Breath Who Undergo ECG and Cardiac Biomarker Testing During Their ED Stay

Time frame: Initial ED visit (baseline)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Providers in the KCMC Emergency DepartmentNumber of Participants Presenting With Chest Pain or Shortness of Breath Who Undergo ECG and Cardiac Biomarker Testing During Their ED Stay431 Participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Taking Aspirin 30 Days After Enrollment

Time frame: 30 days after enrollment

Population: Participants who met criteria for ACS and survived to 30 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Providers in the KCMC Emergency DepartmentNumber of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Taking Aspirin 30 Days After Enrollment42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Taking Aspirin at Baseline

Time frame: Initial ED visit (baseline)

Population: Participants who met criteria for ACS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Providers in the KCMC Emergency DepartmentNumber of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Taking Aspirin at Baseline101 Participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Survival of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) at 30 Days After Enrollment

Number of participants with ACS who have survived at 30 days

Time frame: 30 days after enrollment

Population: Participants who met criteria for ACS.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Providers in the KCMC Emergency DepartmentSurvival of Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) at 30 Days After Enrollment90 Participants
p-value: 0.739Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026