Skip to content

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of BAY1817080 Compared to Placebo in Patients With Chronic Cough

Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Phase 2b Dose-finding, Efficacy and Safety Study of 12-week Twice Daily Oral Administration of BAY 1817080 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Refractory and/or Unexplained Chronic Cough (RUCC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04562155
Acronym
PAGANINI
Enrollment
310
Registered
2020-09-24
Start date
2020-10-02
Completion date
2021-07-23
Last updated
2022-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractory and/or Unexplained Chronic Cough

Keywords

RUCC, Chronic cough, P2X3 receptor antagonist

Brief summary

Researchers in this study want to find the optimal therapeutic dose of drug BAY1817080 for patients with long-standing cough with or without clear causes (refractory and/or unexplained chronic cough, RUCC). Study drug BAY1817080 is a new drug under development for the treatment of long-standing cough. It blocks proteins that are expressed by the airway sensory nerves which are oversensitive in patients with long-standing cough. This prevents the urge to cough. Researchers also want to learn the safety of the study drug and how well it works in reducing the cough frequency, severity and urge-to-cough. Participants in this study will receive either the study drug or placebo (a placebo looks like the test drug but does not have any medicine in it) tablets twice daily for 12 weeks. Observation for each participant will last about 18 weeks in total. Participants will be asked to wear a digital device to record the cough and to complete questionnaires every day to document the symptoms. Blood samples will be collected from the participants to monitor the safety and measure the blood level of the study drug.

Interventions

Study drug BAY1817080 will be administered orally as tablet.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching Placebo for BAY1817080 will be administered orally as tablet.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. * A cough that has lasted for at least 12 months (unresponsive to treatment options) with a diagnosis of refractory chronic cough and/or idiopathic (unexplained) chronic cough. * Persistent cough for at least the last 8 weeks before screening. * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use acceptable effective or highly effective birth control methods during the study and for at least 30 days after the last dose. * Capable of giving signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Smoking history within the last 12 months before screening (all forms of smoking, including e-cigarettes, cannabis and others), and any former smoker with more than 20 pack-years. * Ongoing or previous exposure to inhalational toxic fumes (e.g., ammonia, chlorine, nitrogen dioxide, phosgene and sulfur dioxide) within the last 12 months before screening. * Respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks before screening. * History of chronic bronchitis. * Systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg at screening visit. * Positive SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA and/or serology IgG tests at screening visit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 12 weeksThe raw 24-hour cough count measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device was standardized to an average hourly count. For the ratio between the geometric means of 24-hour cough count, the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count after 12 weeks of intervention was divided by the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count at baseline. btw = between geo = geometric

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe raw 24-hour cough count measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device was standardized to an average hourly count. For the ratio between the geometric means of 24-hour cough count, the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of intervention was divided by the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count at baseline. btw = between geo = geometric
Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeksMeasured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device btw = between geo = geometric
Change From Baseline in Cough Related Quality of Life After 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 12 weeksMeasured by Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) total score. The LCQ was a 19-item instrument that asked about the impact of chronic cough on various aspects of participants' lives using a recall period of two weeks. The 8 items: 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 built the physical domain. 7 items: 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17 built the psychological domain. Further 4 items: 7, 8, 18 and 19 built the social domain. Study participants responded to the items using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (all of the time) to 7 (none of the time) and entered their assessments on a tablet device. Completion of the LCQ took approximately five minutes. The LCQ total score was calculated as a mean score for each of the three domains ranging from 1 to 7, with the LCQ total score ranging from 3 to 21.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 12 weeksThe raw 24-hour cough count measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device was standardized to an average hourly count. The change from baseline in 24-hour cough count was calculated by the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count after 12 weeks of intervention minus the geometric mean at baseline divided by the geometric mean at baseline. The percentage of participants with a reduction of ≥30% is shown
Percentage of Participants With a ≥30 Scale Units Reduction From Baseline After 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 12 weeksMeasured by cough Severity VAS
Percentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline After 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 12 weeksMeasured by LCQ total score. The LCQ was a 19-item instrument that asked about the impact of chronic cough on various aspects of participants' lives using a recall period of two weeks. The 8 items: 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 built the physical domain. 7 items: 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17 built the psychological domain. Further 4 items: 7, 8, 18 and 19 built the social domain. Study participants responded to the items using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (all of the time) to 7 (none of the time) and entered their assessments on a tablet device. Completion of the LCQ took approximately five minutes. The LCQ total score was calculated as a mean score for each of the three domains ranging from 1 to 7, with the LCQ total score ranging from 3 to 21. The percentage of participants with a \>= 1.3-point increase in LCQ total score is shown.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityFrom the start of study intervention administration until 14 days after the last study medication intake, with an average of 80.0 + 14 daysAdverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant, whether or not considered related to the study intervention, occurring from the time of signing the informed consent until the follow-up visit. TEAE was defined as any event occurring or worsening after the start of study intervention administration until 14 days after the last intake of study intervention.
Change From Baseline in Cough Severity After 12 Weeks of InterventionFrom baseline up to 12 weeksMeasured by Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Cough Severity VAS was a single item instrument, asking the study participant to assess the severity of his/her cough using a 0-100 VAS. This was a vertically oriented line ordered from 0-100, with 0 = No Cough and 100 = Extremely Severe Cough.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 99 centers in 19 countries/regions with first participant first visit on 02-Oct-2020 and last participant last visit on 23-Jul-2021.

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 399 participants were screened, 89 of whom were screening failures. The remaining 310 participatns were randomized to 4 treatment groups (75 to eliapixant 25 mg BID, 78 to eliapixant 75 mg BID, 80 to eliapixant 150 mg BID, and 77 to placebo).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eliapixant 25 mg BID
Participants were randomized to receive 25 mg oral doses of eliapixant, administered twice daily over the course of 12 weeks.
75
Eliapixant 75 mg BID
Participants were randomized to receive 75 mg oral doses of eliapixant, administered twice daily over the course of 12 weeks.
78
Eliapixant 150 mg BID
Participants were randomized to receive 150 mg oral doses of eliapixant, administered twice daily over the course of 12 weeks.
80
Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive placebo for eliapixant, administered twice daily over the course of 12 weeks.
77
Total310

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event7381
Overall StudyCOVID-19 pandemic0001
Overall StudyParticipant personal reason1021
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3633

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEliapixant 25 mg BIDEliapixant 75 mg BIDEliapixant 150 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous61.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
58.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
58.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
56.91 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
59.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.79
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
45 Participants50 Participants49 Participants49 Participants193 Participants
Age, Customized
From 65-84 years
30 Participants28 Participants31 Participants28 Participants117 Participants
Baseline 24-hour coughs per hour17.49 24-hour cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
19.23 24-hour cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
15.61 24-hour cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.34
17.63 24-hour cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.07
17.42 24-hour cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
Baseline awake cough count per hour23.62 Cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.02
26.41 Cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.97
21.19 Cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39
24.01 Cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.18
23.70 Cough count per hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88
Baseline Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] Value65.51 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.64
67.08 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.89
66.79 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.86
61.52 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.51
65.20 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.16
Baseline Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score12.00 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.54
11.76 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.77
11.15 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.56
11.53 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.27
11.60 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
74 Participants74 Participants77 Participants75 Participants300 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants63 Participants61 Participants61 Participants241 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants15 Participants19 Participants16 Participants69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 750 / 780 / 800 / 77
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 7537 / 7845 / 8025 / 77
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 751 / 782 / 801 / 77

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention

The raw 24-hour cough count measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device was standardized to an average hourly count. For the ratio between the geometric means of 24-hour cough count, the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count after 12 weeks of intervention was divided by the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count at baseline. btw = between geo = geometric

Time frame: From baseline up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants in PPS with valid 24-hour cough count values in Week 12 or Termination visit.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention0.56 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9191
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention0.47 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9019
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention0.52 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8608
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention0.64 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.7855
Comparison: Detection of dose-response: Emax model (ED50=30) Dose response relationship was assessed using the MCP-Mod method combining multiple comparison procedures (MCP) principles with modeling techniques. A generalized MCP approach (with adjustment for baseline cough count and geographic region) was applied to calculate the adjusted one-sided p-values of the contrast test. Pre-specified overall Type one error at alpha level of 0.1 (one-sided).p-value: =0.0345MCP-Mod method
Comparison: Detection of dose-response: Emax model (ED50=50) Dose response relationship was assessed using the MCP-Mod method combining multiple comparison procedures (MCP) principles with modeling techniques. A generalized MCP approach (with adjustment for baseline cough count and geographic region) was applied to calculate the adjusted one-sided p-values of the contrast test. Pre-specified overall Type one error at alpha level of 0.1 (one-sided).p-value: =0.0376MCP-Mod method
Comparison: Detection of dose-response: sigm. Emax model (ED50=30, h=3) sigm = sigmoidal h = hill parameter Dose response relationship was assessed using the MCP-Mod method combining multiple comparison procedures (MCP) principles with modeling techniques. A generalized MCP approach (with adjustment for baseline cough count and geographic region) was applied to calculate the adjusted one-sided p-values of the contrast test. Pre-specified overall Type one error at alpha level of 0.1 (one-sided).p-value: =0.0319MCP-Mod method
Comparison: Detection of dose-response: sigm. Emax model (ED50=60, h=5) sigm = sigmoidal h = hill parameter Dose response relationship was assessed using the MCP-Mod method combining multiple comparison procedures (MCP) principles with modeling techniques. A generalized MCP approach (with adjustment for baseline cough count and geographic region) was applied to calculate the adjusted one-sided p-values of the contrast test. Pre-specified overall Type one error at alpha level of 0.1 (one-sided).p-value: =0.0603MCP-Mod method
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Intervention

The raw 24-hour cough count measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device was standardized to an average hourly count. For the ratio between the geometric means of 24-hour cough count, the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of intervention was divided by the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count at baseline. btw = between geo = geometric

Time frame: From baseline up to 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Population: PPS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.64 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.7237
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.75 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6134
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.55 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8737
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.51 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8192
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.46 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9484
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.58 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8209
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.51 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8827
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.58 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8589
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.61 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6636
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.75 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.4762
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.69 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6657
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.70 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6451
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Intervention

Measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device btw = between geo = geometric

Time frame: From baseline up to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks

Population: PPS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.78 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6324
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.67 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.739
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.55 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9274
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 120.56 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9582
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.53 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8128
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.47 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9576
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 120.47 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9051
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.60 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8295
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.50 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.9154
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.57 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.8983
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 120.47 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 1.1338
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.60 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6695
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 120.65 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.7926
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 40.72 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6637
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 20.77 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.466
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Awake Cough Frequency Per Hour After 2, 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of InterventionWeek 80.72 Ratio btw geoMeans of 24h cough countStandard Deviation 0.6698
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cough Related Quality of Life After 12 Weeks of Intervention

Measured by Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) total score. The LCQ was a 19-item instrument that asked about the impact of chronic cough on various aspects of participants' lives using a recall period of two weeks. The 8 items: 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 built the physical domain. 7 items: 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17 built the psychological domain. Further 4 items: 7, 8, 18 and 19 built the social domain. Study participants responded to the items using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (all of the time) to 7 (none of the time) and entered their assessments on a tablet device. Completion of the LCQ took approximately five minutes. The LCQ total score was calculated as a mean score for each of the three domains ranging from 1 to 7, with the LCQ total score ranging from 3 to 21.

Time frame: From baseline up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants in PPS with valid Leicester Cough Questionnaire scores in Week 12 or Termination visit were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Cough Related Quality of Life After 12 Weeks of Intervention2.18 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.44
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Cough Related Quality of Life After 12 Weeks of Intervention2.50 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Cough Related Quality of Life After 12 Weeks of Intervention2.73 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cough Related Quality of Life After 12 Weeks of Intervention2.16 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cough Severity After 12 Weeks of Intervention

Measured by Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Cough Severity VAS was a single item instrument, asking the study participant to assess the severity of his/her cough using a 0-100 VAS. This was a vertically oriented line ordered from 0-100, with 0 = No Cough and 100 = Extremely Severe Cough.

Time frame: From baseline up to 12 weeks

Population: All participants in PPS with valid VAS scores in Week 12 or Termination visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Cough Severity After 12 Weeks of Intervention-17.69 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.87
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Cough Severity After 12 Weeks of Intervention-22.66 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.98
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Cough Severity After 12 Weeks of Intervention-22.87 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cough Severity After 12 Weeks of Intervention-17.02 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.88
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated Severity

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant, whether or not considered related to the study intervention, occurring from the time of signing the informed consent until the follow-up visit. TEAE was defined as any event occurring or worsening after the start of study intervention administration until 14 days after the last intake of study intervention.

Time frame: From the start of study intervention administration until 14 days after the last study medication intake, with an average of 80.0 + 14 days

Population: Safety analysis set (SAF): All participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least one tablet of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the intervention they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - moderate22 Participants
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny serious TEAE0 Participants
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - mild21 Participants
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - severe0 Participants
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny TEAE43 Participants
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - severe3 Participants
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - moderate16 Participants
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny serious TEAE1 Participants
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - mild32 Participants
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny TEAE51 Participants
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny TEAE51 Participants
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - moderate25 Participants
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - severe3 Participants
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny serious TEAE2 Participants
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - mild23 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny serious TEAE1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityAny TEAE39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - mild18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - moderate20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Associated SeverityMaximum intensity for any TEAE - severe1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention

Measured by LCQ total score. The LCQ was a 19-item instrument that asked about the impact of chronic cough on various aspects of participants' lives using a recall period of two weeks. The 8 items: 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15 built the physical domain. 7 items: 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, 17 built the psychological domain. Further 4 items: 7, 8, 18 and 19 built the social domain. Study participants responded to the items using a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (all of the time) to 7 (none of the time) and entered their assessments on a tablet device. Completion of the LCQ took approximately five minutes. The LCQ total score was calculated as a mean score for each of the three domains ranging from 1 to 7, with the LCQ total score ranging from 3 to 21. The percentage of participants with a \>= 1.3-point increase in LCQ total score is shown.

Time frame: From baseline up to 12 weeks

Population: PPS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention47.76 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 35.4
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention60.87 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 48.37
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention64.38 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 52.31
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a ≥1.3-point Increase From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention51.35 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 39.44
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention

The raw 24-hour cough count measured by cough recording digital wearable monitoring device was standardized to an average hourly count. The change from baseline in 24-hour cough count was calculated by the geometric mean of 24-hour cough count after 12 weeks of intervention minus the geometric mean at baseline divided by the geometric mean at baseline. The percentage of participants with a reduction of ≥30% is shown

Time frame: From baseline up to 12 weeks

Population: PPS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention52.24 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 39.67
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention63.77 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 51.31
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention53.42 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 41.37
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in 24-hour Cough Count After 12 Weeks of Intervention45.95 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 34.29
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥30 Scale Units Reduction From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention

Measured by cough Severity VAS

Time frame: From baseline up to 12 weeks

Population: PPS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Eliapixant 25 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥30 Scale Units Reduction From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention26.87 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 16.76
Eliapixant 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥30 Scale Units Reduction From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention36.23 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 24.99
Eliapixant 150 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥30 Scale Units Reduction From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention27.40 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 17.61
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a ≥30 Scale Units Reduction From Baseline After 12 Weeks of Intervention20.27 Percentage of participants95% Confidence Interval 11.81

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026