Skip to content

Stratified vs Routine Prophylaxis in Living Kidney Transplantation From HBsAg+ Donors to HBsAg- Recipients

Stratified vs Routine Prophylaxis in Living Kidney Transplantation From HBsAg+ Donors to HBsAg- Recipients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04562051
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-09-24
Start date
2020-09-10
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2023-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HBV, Kidney Transplantation

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study to compare the efficacy and safety of stratified prophylaxis based on donors' and recipients' risk factors vs routine prophylaxis bases on clinical experience in living kidney transplantation from HBsAg+ donors to HBsAg- recipients. The follow-up period was 2 years after renal transplantation. The primary outcome was prevention failure of HBV transmission (any one of HBsAg - → +, HBV DNA - → +, HBeAg - → +, HBeAb - → +, HBcAb - → +, active liver function damage and death in the recipient).

Interventions

OTHERprophylaxis regimen

All recipients were divided into two groups: stratified prophylaxis group based on donors' and recipients' characteristics and routine prophylaxis group based on clinical experience

Sponsors

West China Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. patients diagnosed with end-stage renal diseases and suitable for living kidney transplantation; 2. HBsAg+ donor was the only donor; 3. age and sex of donors and recipients were unrestricted; 4. ABO compatible or incompatible between the donor and recipient; 5. The living donor voluntarily donates one of their kidneys to the recipient free of charge; 6. The donor and recipient can understand the purpose and risk of living KT and sign informed consent; 7. Ethics committee approved.

Exclusion criteria

1. preoperative abnormal liver dysfunction in the donor or recipient (ALT \> 60IU/L for females, and \>75 IU/L for males; or total bilirubin \> 34 umol/L); or preoperative ultrasonography in the donor or recipient reported hepatic cirrhosis; 2. positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match test; 3. combined HCV or HIV infection in the donor or recipient; 4. diagnosed with malignancy or had a history of malignancy in the past 5 years; 5. non-kidney transplantation history.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
composite outcome: prevention failure of HBV transmission from HBsAg+ donors to HBsAg- recipients2020.9-2025.10The primary outcome is the incidence of prevention failure of HBV transmission from HBsAg+ donors to HBsAg- recipients, which is a composite endpoint. The composite outcome includes HBsAg - → +, HBV DNA - → +, HBeAg - → +, HBeAb - → +, HBcAb - → +, active liver function damage and death in the recipients. Liver function damage is defined as postoperative abnormal liver dysfunction (ALT \> 60IU/L for females, and \>75 IU/L for males; or total bilirubin \> 34 umol/L); or postoperative ultrasonography reported hepatic cirrhosis in the recipient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graft loss2020.9-2025.10Graft loss was defined as re-establishment of long-term dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of \<15 ml/min.
biopsy-confirmed acute rejection2020.9-2025.10biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was diagnosed clinically based on a significant increase in serum creatinine levels of 50% or more within 3 days, which was not explained by other reasons and confirmed by biopsy.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactTao Lin, PhD
kidney5@163.com+8618980602093

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026