Skip to content

Pain in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis in Rouen University Hospital

Pain in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis in Rouen University Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04561973
Acronym
MUCODOL
Enrollment
109
Registered
2020-09-24
Start date
2019-11-04
Completion date
2020-11-01
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

pain, cystic fibrosis, epidemiology, adults, children

Brief summary

Objectif Principal \- To evaluate the intensity and frequency of pain episodes in patients with cystic fibrosis followed at the cystic fibrosis center of Rouen University Hospital, Normandy, France. Objectifs secondaires * To assess the relationship between pain and disease severity. * To assess the relationship between pain and the age of the patient. * To describe the pain locations. * To describe the use of pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatment. * To evaluate the procedural pain.

Detailed description

Patients seen for routine planned visits complete a self-administered retrospective questionnaire about pain during the last 3 months, and a prospective diary during the two weeks following the visit. Primary evaluation criteria : Intensity and frequency of pain are evaluated with the prospective diary. * The pain intensity is assessed by validated scales adapted to the patient's age (scale ranging from 0 to 10). 0 to 6 years : numerical rating scale assessed by the parents. 4 to 7 years : Faces Pain Scale Revised. Children 6 years and older, adolescents and adults: numerical rating scale self-reported * The pain frequency is completed twice a day (morning and evening) on the prospective pain diary. Secondary evaluation criteria * The disease severity, estimated using recent forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (best measurement of the year before bronchodilator, collected in the patient's medical record) * Pain locations, pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatment and procedural pain are evaluated using the diary and the questionnaire. * Demographic data and characteristics of cystic fibrosis are collected using the medical file.

Interventions

Patients seen for routine planned visits complete a self-administered retrospective questionnaire about pain during the last 3 months, and a prospective diary during the two weeks following the visit.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children and adults followed at the cystic fibrosis center of Rouen University Hospital, Normandy, France. * Seen for routine planned visits. * Having expressed their non-opposition or whose non-opposition was expressed by the parents or legal representatives for minors

Exclusion criteria

* Patients seen for an acute episode or exacerbation outside of routine planned visits or patient hospitalized. * Major patient under legal protection. * Major patient having problems understanding the oral and written French language or child whose parents or legal representatives have problems understanding the oral and written French language.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the intensity and frequency of pain episodes in patients with cystic fibrosis followed at the cystic fibrosis center of Rouen University Hospital, Normandy, France14 daysIntensity and frequency of pain are evaluated with the prospective diary. The pain intensity is assessed by validated scales adapted to the patient's age (scale ranging from 0 to 10). 0 to 6 years : numerical rating scale assessed by the parents. 4 to 7 years : Faces Pain Scale Revised. Children 6 years and older, adolescents and adults: numerical rating scale self-reported The pain frequency is completed twice a day (morning and evening) on the prospective pain diary.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the correlation between pain and disease severity14 daysThe disease severity is estimated using recent forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (best measurement of the year before bronchodilator), collected in the patient's medical record. The correlation between pain and the disease severity will be studied with a Spearman's correlation coefficient.
To assess the correlation between pain and the age of the patient.14 daysAge of the patient is collected using the medical file. The correlation between pain and the age will be studied with a Spearman's correlation coefficient.
To describe the pain locations.14 daysPain locations are evaluated using the prospective diary and the self-administered retrospective questionnaire.
To describe the use of pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatment.14 daysThe pharmacological or nonpharmacological treatments are evaluated using the prospective diary (did you take a treatment for that pain episode ?) and the self-administered retrospective questionnaire. The efficacity of the treatment is evaluated with the diary (relief or not) et the questionnaire (Likert-type rating scale : Always, often, rarely, never).
To evaluate the procedural pain.3 monthsThe procedural pain and the proposed pain treatment are evaluated using the self-administered retrospective questionnaire.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026