Skip to content

HIS-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

HIS-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04561778
Acronym
HOT-CRT
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-09-24
Start date
2021-04-15
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiomyopathies, Heart Failure,Congestive, Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Brief summary

This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded trial to determine the overall rate of successful His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus lead (BVP) to compare acute and mid-term outcomes. Acute outcomes include change in QRS duration pre-and post-pacing (degree of QRS narrowing) and incidence of major periprocedural complications (pericardial tamponade, need for lead revision, etc.). Mid-term outcomes include echocardiographic response at 6 months along with a composite clinical outcome of heart failure hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, crossover, and all-cause mortality.

Detailed description

This is a single-blinded study of 100 patients randomized to a strategy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus (CS) lead (BVP). Both treatment options use standard-of-care, FDA-approved devices. The distinction is only in the allocation toward HOT-CRT and BVP. Treating physicians will be aware of assignment in order to facilitate routine device follow-up. Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic evaluation will also be performed in a blinded manner. Cross-over is permitted between treatment group allocation if: CS lead cannot be placed due to difficult cannulation of the CS, limited branches at the posterolateral or lateral wall, or phrenic nerve capture. These subjects may then cross-over to HOT-CRT. HOT-CRT subjects may cross-over if His or left bundle pacing lead cannot be positioned with adequate stability and reasonable pacing output, or if optimal QRS narrowing cannot be achieved. Implant procedure will be per routine percutaneous access, as is standard for pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs). . All subjects will receive an FDA-approved cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker or defibrillator device, as per standard of care outlined for the subject. Follow-up will be performed at 2 weeks post-implant for incision check and device interrogation as is standard of care. In addition, routine device and clinical follow-up will be scheduled at 3 and 6 months. Electrocardiography (ECG) will be performed pre-implant, prior to hospital discharge, at 3 months, and 6 months. Echocardiography will be performed pre-implant and 6 months to evaluate for change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), chamber dimensions, volumes, and change in Left Ventricular (LV) end systolic volume index as is standard of care in the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and quality of life (utilizing the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EQ 5D) will be assessed pre-implant and at 6 months.

Interventions

DEVICEHOT-CRT

Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will have His bundle pacing lead placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and left ventricular timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization.

Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent CIED (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to Biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.

Sponsors

Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Subjects will be blinded to treatment arm. Echocardiographic evaluation will be performed by study physician blinded to lead placement

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients at least 18 years of age * Diagnosis is NYHA Class II, III, and ambulatory Class IV heart failure with either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and patients with NYHA Class I symptoms and ischemic cardiomyopathy, with at least one of the following: * LV systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 35% and Evidence of bundle branch block with QRS duration \> 120 msec * LV systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 50% and with need for \>40% Right Ventricular (RV) pacing

Exclusion criteria

* Existing CRT device * Inability of patient capacity to provide consent for themselves either due to medical or psychiatric comorbidity * Pregnancy * Participation in other device trials * Inability to complete study requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Endpoint6 monthsImprovement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) - change in LVEF% measured by 2D echo at 6 months compared to baseline
Primary Safety6 monthsFreedom from major complications or need for CRT lead revision - complication such as lead dislodgment, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, systemic embolism, phrenic nerve stimulation not correctable by programming

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Composite6 monthsCrossover, ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), Heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death
Echocardiographic Response6 monthschange in LVEF \>5%

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects will be recruited from Geisinger Wyoming Valley, Geisinger Medical Center, and Geisinger Community Medical Center. Investigators will identify eligible subjects, describe the study procedures and invite them to participate in the study. Informed Consent (ICF) will be provided to the subject and they will have ample time and opportunity to review and consider participation. Prior to performing any study procedures, the subject will sign the ICF and be considered enrolled at that point.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were screened to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria pre consent and post consent, pre implant. In some cases, a repeat echo was scheduled to obtain ejection fraction (EF) measurement as part of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and result was pending at time of consent, therefore when resulted and patient no longer met inclusion criteria, they were screen failed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HOT-CRT
Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will undergo CRT as described below. His bundle pacing lead will be placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and LV timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization. This will be at the discretion of the implanting physician. Only FDA approved leads and devices will be used. HOT-CRT: Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will have His bundle pacing lead placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and left ventricular timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization.
50
Biventricular Pacing
Subjects randomized to biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.Only FDA approved leads and devices will be used. Biventricular Pacing: Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent CIED (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to Biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.
50
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHOT-CRTBiventricular PacingTotal
Age, Continuous
All patients
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Atrial fibrillation12 Participants22 Participants34 Participants
Chronic kidney disease17 Participants18 Participants35 Participants
Coronary Artery Disease23 Participants22 Participants45 Participants
Diabetes26 Participants23 Participants49 Participants
Hypertension42 Participants38 Participants80 Participants
Left bundle branch block31 Participants31 Participants62 Participants
Left ventricular ejection fraction30.1 percent ejection fraction
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
30.7 percent ejection fraction
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
30.4 percent ejection fraction
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Medications
ACE
22 Participants13 Participants35 Participants
Medications
Aldosterone antagonist
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Medications
Amiodarone
9 Participants8 Participants17 Participants
Medications
ARB
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Medications
ARNI
11 Participants14 Participants25 Participants
Medications
Beta blocker
45 Participants47 Participants92 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Nonischemic cardiomyopathy30 Participants31 Participants61 Participants
QRS164 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26
166 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28
165.0 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
All patients
Female
11 Participants20 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
All patients
Male
39 Participants30 Participants69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 572 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 570 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 5732 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Endpoint

Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) - change in LVEF% measured by 2D echo at 6 months compared to baseline

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 50 patients randomized to BiV - 43 received BiV treatment 50 patients randomized to HOTCRT - 57 received HOTCRT treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HOT-CRTPrimary Endpoint12.4 percent ejection fractionStandard Deviation 7.3
Biventricular PacingPrimary Endpoint8.0 percent ejection fractionStandard Deviation 10.1
Primary

Primary Safety

Freedom from major complications or need for CRT lead revision - complication such as lead dislodgment, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, systemic embolism, phrenic nerve stimulation not correctable by programming

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 50 patients randomized to BiV - 43 received BiV treatment 50 patients randomized to HOTCRT - 57 received HOTCRT treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HOT-CRTPrimary Safety49 Participants
Biventricular PacingPrimary Safety48 Participants
Secondary

Echocardiographic Response

change in LVEF \>5%

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 50 patients randomized to BiV - 43 received BiV treatment 50 patients randomized to HOTCRT - 57 received HOTCRT treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HOT-CRTEchocardiographic Response35 Participants
Biventricular PacingEchocardiographic Response27 Participants
Secondary

Secondary Composite

Crossover, ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), Heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 50 patients randomized to BiV - 43 received BiV treatment 50 patients randomized to HOTCRT - 57 received HOTCRT treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HOT-CRTSecondary Composite9 Participants
Biventricular PacingSecondary Composite14 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026