Skip to content

Aquablation vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Medium to Large Size Prostates

Aquablation vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Medium to Large Size Prostates: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04560907
Acronym
ATHLETE
Enrollment
120
Registered
2020-09-23
Start date
2021-01-05
Completion date
2027-11-30
Last updated
2021-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Brief summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common diseases in men. As BPH progresses, surgical treatments often become necessary. Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an established procedure in the surgical treatment of BPH, especially for medium to large prostates. The long learning curve, the length of surgery, and expensive equipment still limit the availability of HoLEP to a few specialized centers. Recently, a new method for treating BPH called aquablation has become commercially available. This technique uses real-time ultrasound imaging in combination with a robotic high-pressure water jet programmed and guided by the surgeon to resect prostate tissue. A RCT has shown functional results similar to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for small to medium size prostates . However, so far there are no controlled studies assessing whether Aquablation provides patient reported and functional outcomes that are non-inferior compared to HoLEP in medium size to large prostates (the latter cannot be operated by TURP due to its size limitations). As aquablation offers some obvious advantages compared to HoLEP regarding learning curve and operation time, the aim of this study is to test whether efficacy and safety of aquablation are non- inferior compared to HoLEP in patients with medium to large size prostates, which would clearly support the use of aquablation and change everyday clinical practice.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAquablation

By means of a high-pressure saline stream, parenchymal tissue of the prostate is removed endoscopically through a heat-free mechanism called hydrodissection. The intervention is supported by live ultrasound guidance and the required depth as well as the angle of the resection is planned out prior to the resection. The bladder is accessed using a 24-Fr hand-piece, which accommodates the scope. The handpiece is supported by an articulating arm attached to the operation table. Once placed in the optimal position, the system automatically adjusts the alignment as necessary. Hemostasis is consecutively achieved through diathermy and post procedure, a threeway catheter is inserted and bladder irrigation is initiated.

PROCEDUREHoLEP

This is done endoscopically under general anesthesia the three lobes of the prostate that are cored out intact with the laser are pushed into the bladder before being morcellated by a special instrument inserted through the telescopic camera. A catheter is placed into the bladder to drain the urine while the raw surface heals, then left in place for around 24 hours before being removed on the day of discharge from hospital. Sterile saline fluid is also irrigated into the bladder through the catheter to dilute any blood in the urine and prevent clots from forming.

Sponsors

Dr. med. Gautier Müllhaupt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men ≥45 years of age * Patient must be a candidate for HoLEP * Refractory to medical therapy or patient is not willing to consider (further) medical treatment * Patient has a prostate size of at least 50 ml and not more than 150ml, measured by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) * IPSS ≥12 * QoL≥3 * Qmax ≤ 15 ml/s with a minimum voided volume ≥ 125 ml or patient in urinary retention * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction * Urethral stenosis * Preinterventionally proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate * Nickel allergy * Not able to complete questionnaires due to cognitive or thought disorders * Language skills insufficient for informed consent and / or completion of questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)6 monthsThe International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) can be utilized to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. The IPSS is made up of 7 questions related to voiding symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026